| Literature DB >> 26078724 |
Luning Sun1, Ying Jin2, Liming Dong3, Hai-Juan Sui2, Ryo Sumi4, Rabita Jahan5, Dahai Hu6, Zhi Li7.
Abstract
Declining in learning and memory is one of the most common and prominent problems during the aging process. Neurotransmitter changes, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and abnormal signal transduction were considered to participate in this process. In the present study, we examined the effects of Coccomyxa gloeobotrydiformis (CGD) on learning and memory ability of intrinsic aging rats. As a result, CGD treated (50 mg/kg·d or 100 mg/kg ·d for a duration of 8 weeks) 22-month-old male rats, which have shown significant improvement on learning and spatial memory ability compared with control, which was evidently revealed in both the hidden platform tasks and probe trials. The following immunohistochemistry and Western blot experiments suggested that CGD could increase the content of Ach and thereby improve the function of the cholinergic neurons in the hippocampus, and therefore also improving learning and memory ability of the aged rats by acting as an anti-inflammatory agent. The effects of CGD on learning and memory might also have an association with the ERK/CREB signalling. The results above suggest that the naturally made drug CGD may have several great benefit as a multi-target drug in the process of prevention and/or treatment of age-dependent cognitive decline and aging process.Entities:
Keywords: Coccomyxa gloeobotrydifomemory; ERK/CREB signalling; aging; cholinergic neurons; hippocampus; inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26078724 PMCID: PMC4466463 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.10861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Fig 1Influence of CGD on Morris water maze performance in the aged rat. A. The escape latency of Morris water maze analysis during the whole training sessions. B. The time spent in the target quadrant in the probe trial. Mean ± SEM n=15. 50 mg/kg CGD treated group; CGD100: 100 mg/kg CGD treated group.
Fig 2Influence of CGD on ChAT expression in the hippocampus. A. ChAT-positive immunostaining in hippocampal CA1 region of control. B. ChAT-positive immunostaining in hippocampal CA1 region of CGD treated group. Magnification: ×400. C. Western blotting of ChAT expression in hippocampal CA1 region. Mean ± SEM n=4. **P<0.01; compared with aged-control rats.
Fig 3Influence of CGD on TrkA protein expression in hippocampus of aged rats. A. TrkA immunostaining in hippocampal CA3 region of control group. B. TrkA immunostaining in hippocampal CA3 region of CGD treated group. C. TrkA immunostaining in granule cells of the basal forebrain (BF) of control group. D. TrkA immunostaining in granule cells of the dentate gyrus of CGD treated group. E. TrkA immunostaining in hippocampal CA1 region of control group. F. TrkA immunostaining in hippocampal CA1 region of CGD treated group. Magnification: ×400. G. Western blotting of TrkA protein expression in hippocampal CA3 region and BF. Mean ± SEM n=4 *P<0.05; compared with aged-control rats.
Fig 4Influence of CGD on inflammatory reactions in the hippocampus. A. GFAP immunostaining of astrocytes in hippocampal CA1 region of aged control rats. B. GFAP immunostaining of astrocytes in hippocampal CA1 region of CGD-treated aged rats. Magnification: ×400. C. IL-1β expression in hippocampal CA1 region. Mean ± SEM n=4 **P<0.01; compared with aged control rats.
Fig 5Influence of CGD on eNOS expression and NO production in hippocampus. A. eNOS immunohistochemistry in hippocampal CA1 region of the aged control. B. eNOS immunohistochemistry in hippocampal CA1 region of the CGD-treated aged rats. C. eNOS immunohistochemistry in hippocampal CA3 region of the aged control. D. eNOS immunohistochemistry in hippocampal CA3 region of the CGD-treated aged rats. Magnification: ×400. E. Western blotting of eNOS in hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions. Mean ± SEM n=4; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; compared with aged-control rats. F. Nitrite levels in hippocampal CA1, hippocampal CA3, Basal forebrain (BF), and temporal cortex (TC). Mean ± SEM n=8. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; compared with aged control rats.
Fig 6Influence of CGD on the phosphorylation of ERK1 and CREB. A. Western blotting of phospho-ERK1 in hippocampal CA1 region. B. Western blotting of phospho-CREB in hippocampal CA1 region. Mean ± SEM n=4. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; compared with aged-control rats.