| Literature DB >> 23983614 |
Luning Sun1, Ying Jin, Liming Dong, Ryo Sumi, Rabita Jahan, Zhi Li.
Abstract
Stroke is a major cause of mortality and the leading cause of permanent disability. In this study, we adopted the classic middle cerebral artery occlusion(MCAO) stroke model to observe the therapeutic effects of coccomyxa gloeobotrydiformis(CGD) on ischemic stroke, and discuss the underlying mechanisms. Low dose (50 mg/kg.day) and high dose (100 mg/kg.day) concentrations of the drug CGD were intragastrically administrated separately for 8 weeks. Infarct volumes, neurologic deficits and degree of stroke-induced brain edema were measured 24 hours after reperfusion. Furthermore, oxidative stress related factors (SOD and MDA), mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis regulatory factors (mitochondrial Cyt-C, Bcl-2, Bax, and caspase-3) were all investigated in this research. We found that CGD attenuated cerebral infarction, brain edema and neurologic deficits; CGD maintained the mitochondrial membrane potential and decreased mitochondrial swelling. It also prevented oxidative damage by reducing MDA and increasing SOD. In addition, CGD could effectively attenuate apoptosis by restoring the level of mitochondrial Cyt C and regulating the expression of Bcl-2, Bax and caspase 3. These results revealed that CGD has a therapeutic effect on ischemic stroke, possibly by inducing mitochondrial protection and anti-apoptotic mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Coccomyxa gloeobotrydiformis (CGD); apoptosis; ischemic stroke; mitochondrion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23983614 PMCID: PMC3753445 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.6734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Fig 1A. Infarct area of sham group. B. Infarct area of MCAO group. C. Infarct area of CGD100 group. D. Percentage of infarct volume in each group. E. Percentage of brain water content in each group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with MCAO group.
Neurological Deficit Grading System
| Groups | Sham | MCAO | CGD50 | CGD100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0 | 2.67±0.36 | 1.92±0.23 | 1.17±0.29** |
**P<0.01; compared with MCAO group
Level of hippocampal SOD and MDA
| SOD, U/mg protein | MDA, μmol/mg protein | |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 13.80±1.16 | 2.89±0.33 |
| MCAO | 9.63±0.88** | 4.53±0.41** |
| CGD50 | 11.89±0.95 | 3.29±0.39# |
| CGD100 | 12.90±0.94# | 2.94±0.32## |
**P<0.01, compared with sham group; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01, compared with MCAO group.
Fig 2A. Effect of CGD on the mitochondrial membrane swelling; B. Mitochondria membrane potential. Means±SEM n=6. **p<0.01, compared with sham group; # p<0.05, ##P<0.01, compared with MCAO group compared with MCAO group.
Fig 3Content of Mitochondrial Cyt-C by immunoassay. Means±S.E.M; **p<0.01, compared with sham group; # p<0.05, compared with MCAO group.
Fig 4Expression of Bcl-2, Bax and caspase 3 proteins by Western Blot. Means±S.E.M, **p<0.01vs sham group. ## p<0.01 vs MCAO group.