Literature DB >> 26078452

The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Jaskarndip Chahal1, Geoffrey S Van Thiel2, Richard C Mather3, Simon Lee2, Sang Hoon Song2, Aileen M Davis4, Michael Salata5, Shane J Nho2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is minimal information available on the threshold at which patients consider themselves to be well for patient-reported outcome measures used in patients treated with hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
PURPOSE: To determine the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) in patients with FAI treated with arthroscopic hip surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A consecutive series of patients at a single institution with FAI who were treated with arthroscopic labral surgery, acetabular rim trimming, and femoral osteochondroplasty were eligible. The mHHS (score range, 0-100) and the HOS (score range, 0-100) were administered at baseline and at 12 months postoperatively. An external anchor question at 1 year postoperatively was utilized to determine PASS values: "Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?"
RESULTS: There were 130 patients (mean ± SD age, 35.6 ± 11.7 years), and 42.3% were male. Based on a receiver operator curve analysis, the PASS values-at which patients considered their status to be satisfactory-at 1 year after surgery were 74 (mHHS), 87 (HOS-activities of daily living subscale), and 75 (HOS-sports subscale). The PASS threshold was not affected by baseline scores across different instruments. However, patients with higher baseline scores were more likely to achieve the PASS (odds ratios: 3.36 [mHHS], 3.83 [HOS-activities of daily living], 3.38 [HOS-sports]). Age and sex were not significantly related to the odds of achieving the PASS for the mHHS or the HOS.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to determine the PASS for 2 commonly used hip joint patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing surgery for FAI. The study findings can allow researchers to determine if interventions related to FAI are meaningful to patients at the individual level across various domains and will also be useful for responder analyses in future randomized trials related to hip arthroscopy and the treatment of FAI.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoroacetabular impingement; hip arthroscopy; patient acceptable symptomatic state; patient-reported outcome measure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26078452     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515587739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  60 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Biologics for Hip Preservation.

Authors:  Toufic R Jildeh; Muhammad J Abbas; Patrick Buckley; Kelechi R Okoroha
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?

Authors:  Pascal Cyrill Haefeli; Christoph Emanuel Albers; Simon Damian Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Lorenz Büchler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  For the outcomes of hip arthroscopy, you need to consider not only the patient's sex and age.

Authors:  Fei Han; Pengfei Lei; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Sports Medicine: A Concise Resource for Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  Kenneth C Lam; Ashley N Marshall; Alison R Snyder Valier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Promising outcomes of hip mosaicplasty by minimally invasive anterior approach using osteochondral autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head.

Authors:  Maria-Roxana Viamont-Guerra; Nicolas Bonin; Olivier May; Augustin Le Viguelloux; Mo Saffarini; Frédéric Laude
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Inari Laaksonen; James W Connelly; Sean J Matuszak; Marc Nortje; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does the nature of chondrolabral injury affect the results of open surgery for femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Lucas A Anderson; Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Mike B Anderson; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of two different stems for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedram Yavari; Bahareh Baghchi; Mehdi Tavassoli; Pouya Moshkdar; Sepehr Eslami; Amirhossein Sadeghian; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15

9.  How Should We Define Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement on the iHOT-12?

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Brenda Chang; Edward C Beck; William H Neal; Kamran Movassaghi; Anil S Ranawat; Shane J Nho
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-11-15

10.  Preoperative Hip Extension Strength Is an Independent Predictor of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Edward C Beck; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Laura M Krivicich; Philip Malloy; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Kyleen Jan; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.