Daniel Livorsi1, Amber Comer2, Marianne S Matthias3, Eli N Perencevich4, Matthew J Bair3. 1. 1Division of Infectious Diseases,Indiana University School of Medicine,Indianapolis,Indiana. 2. 2Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health,Indiana University,Indianapolis,Indiana. 3. 3Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service Center for Health Information and Communication,Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center,Indianapolis,Indiana. 4. 5Division of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases,Department of Internal Medicine,University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine,Iowa City,Iowa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand the professional and psychosocial factors that influence physician antibiotic prescribing habits in the inpatient setting. DESIGN: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 inpatient physicians. Interviews consisted of open-ended questions and flexible probes based on participant responses. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Data were analyzed using emergent thematic analysis. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals in Indianapolis, Indiana PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 inpatient physicians (10 physicians-in-training, 20 supervising staff) were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Participants recognized that antibiotics are overused, and many admitted to prescribing antibiotics even when the clinical evidence of infection was uncertain. Overprescription was largely driven by anxiety about missing an infection, whereas potential adverse effects of antibiotics did not strongly influence decision making. Participants did not routinely disclose potential adverse effects of antibiotics to inpatients. Physicians-in-training were strongly influenced by the antibiotic prescribing behavior of their supervising staff physicians. Participants sometimes questioned their colleagues' antibiotic prescribing decisions, but they frequently avoided providing direct feedback or critique. These physicians cited obstacles of hierarchy, infrequent face-to-face encounters, and the awkwardness of these conversations. CONCLUSION: A physician-based culture of prescribing antibiotics involves overusing antibiotics and not challenging the decisions of colleagues. The potential adverse effects of antibiotics did not strongly influence decision making in this sample. A better understanding of these factors could be leveraged in future efforts to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in the inpatient setting.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the professional and psychosocial factors that influence physician antibiotic prescribing habits in the inpatient setting. DESIGN: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 inpatient physicians. Interviews consisted of open-ended questions and flexible probes based on participant responses. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Data were analyzed using emergent thematic analysis. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals in Indianapolis, Indiana PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 inpatient physicians (10 physicians-in-training, 20 supervising staff) were enrolled in this study. RESULTS:Participants recognized that antibiotics are overused, and many admitted to prescribing antibiotics even when the clinical evidence of infection was uncertain. Overprescription was largely driven by anxiety about missing an infection, whereas potential adverse effects of antibiotics did not strongly influence decision making. Participants did not routinely disclose potential adverse effects of antibiotics to inpatients. Physicians-in-training were strongly influenced by the antibiotic prescribing behavior of their supervising staff physicians. Participants sometimes questioned their colleagues' antibiotic prescribing decisions, but they frequently avoided providing direct feedback or critique. These physicians cited obstacles of hierarchy, infrequent face-to-face encounters, and the awkwardness of these conversations. CONCLUSION: A physician-based culture of prescribing antibiotics involves overusing antibiotics and not challenging the decisions of colleagues. The potential adverse effects of antibiotics did not strongly influence decision making in this sample. A better understanding of these factors could be leveraged in future efforts to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in the inpatient setting.
Authors: C William Wester; Lakshmi Durairaj; Arthur T Evans; David N Schwartz; Shahid Husain; Enrique Martinez Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-10-28
Authors: Sara E Cosgrove; Susan K Seo; Maureen K Bolon; Kent A Sepkowitz; Michael W Climo; Daniel J Diekema; Kathleen Speck; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Gary A Noskin; Loreen A Herwaldt; Edward Wong; Trish M Perl Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Daniella Meeker; Tara K Knight; Mark W Friedberg; Jeffrey A Linder; Noah J Goldstein; Craig R Fox; Alan Rothfeld; Guillermo Diaz; Jason N Doctor Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Peter Davey; Erwin Brown; Esmita Charani; Lynda Fenelon; Ian M Gould; Alison Holmes; Craig R Ramsay; Philip J Wiffen; Mark Wilcox Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-04-30
Authors: E Charani; E Castro-Sanchez; N Sevdalis; Y Kyratsis; L Drumright; N Shah; A Holmes Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Eili Y Klein; Elena M Martinez; Larissa May; Mustapha Saheed; Valerie Reyna; David A Broniatowski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joanne Oi Sze Chan; Melissa Therese Baysari; Jane Ellen Carland; Indy Sandaradura; Maria Moran; Richard Osborne Day Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-07-28 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: David A Broniatowski; Eili Y Klein; Larissa May; Elena M Martinez; Chelsea Ware; Valerie F Reyna Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Kevin Antoine Brown; Bradley Langford; Kevin L Schwartz; Christina Diong; Gary Garber; Nick Daneman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Daniel Livorsi; Amber R Comer; Marianne S Matthias; Eli N Perencevich; Matthew J Bair Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Matthew F Griffith; Laura C Feemster; Steven B Zeliadt; Lucas M Donovan; Laura J Spece; Edmunds M Udris; David H Au Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Mihaela S Stefan; Kerry A Spitzer; Sehar Zulfiqar; Brent D Heineman; Timothy P Hogan; Lauren M Westafer; Michael S Pulia; Victor M Pinto-Plata; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Asthma Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 2.515