| Literature DB >> 26077768 |
Roberta F Carvalho1, Grazielle V B Huguenin2, Ronir R Luiz3, Annie S B Moreira4, Glaucia M M Oliveira5, Glorimar Rosa6,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Thyroid hormones can lower levels of atherogenic lipoproteins, and selenium is important in thyroid hormone homeostasis. We aimed to investigate the effects of a healthy diet associated with the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) in dyslipidemic and hypertensive patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26077768 PMCID: PMC4488974 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-015-0036-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Fig. 1Flowchart of participants in the randomized clinical trial
Baseline characteristics of the study and dropout patients
| Characteristic | Concluded study ( | Drop out ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age - years | 60.05 ± 10.27 | 61.50 ± 9.47 | NS |
| Male – n (%) | 43 (55.8 %) | 6 (50.0 %) | NS |
| Body mass index – kg/m2 | 29.54 ± 5.60 | 28.51 ± 3.38 | NS |
| Plasma selenium - μg/L | 87.57 ± 16.29 | 85.83 ± 18.67 | NS |
| SBP (mmHg) | 142.26 ± 28.40 | 136.08 ± 18.82 | NS |
| DBP (mmHg) | 82.19 ± 14.15 | 82.83 ± 9.47 | NS |
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 2.91 ± 0.41 | 2.93 ± 0.67 | NS |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1.20 ± 0.18 | 1.21 ± 0.15 | NS |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 217.88 ± 89.96 | 203.83 ± 56.26 | NS |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 130.10 ± 58.42 | 131.33 ± 49.22 | NS |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 38.83 ± 12.94 | 38.17 ± 9.81 | NS |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 230.88 ± 224.09 | 194.58 ± 109.74 | NS |
Mean ± SD or n (%). SBP systolic blood pressure; DBP diastolic blood pressure; FT free triiodothyronine; FT free thyroxine; LDL low density lipoprotein; HDL high density lipoprotein
For quantitative variables, we used a Student’s t test for independent samples (selenium and age) or a Mann–Whitney U test for variables with normal and non-normal distributions, respectively. For categorical variables, we used a Chi-squared test. There was no significant difference between groups at baseline
Baseline characteristics of the study patients
| Characteristics | Brazil nut ( | Placebo ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age – years | 59.6 ± 10.8 | 60.4 ± 9.9 |
| Elderly – n (%)* | 19 (54.3 %) | 22 (52.4 %) |
| Male – n (%) | 20 (57.1 %) | 23 (54.8 %) |
| Diabetes – n (%) | 17 (48.6 %) | 15 (35.7 %) |
| BMI– kg/m2 | 29.9 ± 6.5 | 29.3 ± 4.8 |
| Overweight / obesity – n. (%) | 27 (77.1 %) | 35 (83.3 %) |
| Plasma selenium - μg/L | 88.7 ± 15.3 | 86.6 ± 17.2 |
| Physical activity – n (%)† | 13 (37.1 %) | 14 (33.3 %) |
| MET (kcal/day) | 23.8 ± 46.1 | 27.1 ± 53.8 |
| Drug therapy – n (%) | ||
| Lipid-lowering drugs | ||
| Statins | 31 (88.6) | 35 (83.3) |
| Ezetimibe | 18 (51.4) | 15 (35.7) |
| Fibrate | 15 (42.8) | 14 (33.3) |
| Antihypertensive drugs | ||
| Diuretics | 25 (71.4) | 26 (61.9) |
| ACE Inhibitors | 16 (45.7) | 22 (52.4) |
| Calcium channel blockers | 14 (40.0) | 15 (35.7) |
| Sympatholytic | 31 (88.6) | 35 (83.3) |
| Vasodilators | 16 (45.7) | 20 (47.6) |
| ARB | 13 (37.1) | 14 (33.3) |
Mean ± SD or n (%). BMI Body mass index; MET metabolic equivalent; ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB angiotensin II receptor blockers
* Individuals older than 60
† Expressed as the percentage of individuals who responded positively to these questions (% Yes)
For quantitative variables, we used a Student’s t test for independent samples (selenium and age) or a Mann–Whitney U test for variables with normal and non-normal distributions, respectively. For categorical variables, we used a chi-squared test. There was no significant difference between groups at baseline
Dietary data for the two study groups
| Dietary component (intake/day) | Brazil nut ( | Placebo ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy intake (kcal) | - 232.3 ± 153.7 | - 390.1 ± 534.0 | 0.030* | <0.001* | NS |
| Lipids (%) | 0.2 ± 5.4 | - 0.6 ± 7.4 | NS | NS | NS |
| Saturated FA (%) | - 0.4 ± 2.4 | - 0.7 ± 3.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| Monounsaturated FA (%) | 0.3 ± 3.0 | −0.6 ± 4.1 | NS | NS | NS |
| Polyunsaturated FA (%) | 0.2 ± 1.6 | 0.2 ± 1.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| n-3 polyunsaturated FA (g) | - 0.1 ± 0.3 | −0.1 ± 0.4 | NS | NS | NS |
| Carbohydrates (%) | −2.4 ± 11.1 | 2.5 ± 12.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| Proteins (%) | 1.8 ± 9.2 | 1.0 ± 10.0 | NS | NS | NS |
| Selenium (μg) | 231.1 ± 35.3 | −8.2 ± 44.0 | <0.001* | NS | <0.001* |
Mean ± SD. FA, fatty acids; NS, non-significant
* Significant differences were assumed at P < 0.05
a Statistical differences in Brazil nut group compared to baseline
b Statistical difference in placebo group compared to baseline
c Statistical differences between groups compared at T90
Thyroid hormones, blood pressure and serum lipoproteins at baseline and after the 90-day trial
| Variables | Brazil nut ( | Placebo ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 0.1 ± 1.1 | −0.1 ± 0.4 | NS | 0.030* | NS |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 0.1 ± 0.6 | −0.1 ± 0.1 | NS | NS | NS |
| TSH (μUI/mL) | 0.2 ± 1.8 | −0.2 ± 0.9 | NS | NS | 0.06 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 3.5 ± 18.0 | −4.0 ± 30.7 | NS | NS | NS |
| DBP (mmHg) | −1.5 ± 13.6 | −5.0 ± 15.2 | NS | 0.020* | NS |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | −20.5 ± 61.2 | −7.4 ± 44.5 | 0.020* | NS | NS |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | −6.4 ± 57.9 | −6.5 ± 39.5 | NS | NS | NS |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | −1.0 ± 5.0 | 0.8 ± 7.1 | NS | NS | NS |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | −49.6 ± 198.2 | −0.05 ± 104.1 | NS | NS | NS |
| Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | −19.5 ± 61.2 | −8.2 ± 44.5 | 0.020* | NS | NS |
| Apolipoprotein A-1 (mg/dL) | −10.2 ± 26.7 | −7.9 ± 27.8 | 0.040* | NS | NS |
| Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL) | −5.2 ± 25.9 | −5.0 ± 23.4 | NS | NS | NS |
| ApoB/ApoA-1 ratio | 0.02 ± 0.2 | −0.06 ± 0.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| Lp(a) (mg/dl) | −0.5 ± 23.7 | 5.9 ± 18.0 | NS | 0.02* | NS |
Mean ± SD. FT3, free triiodothyronine; FT4, free thyroxine; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure, ApoB, apolipoprotein B; ApoA-1, apolipoprotein A-1; Lp(a), lipoprotein (a)
a Statistical differences in Brazil nut group compared to baseline
b Statistical difference in placebo group compared to baseline
c Statistical differences between group compared at T90
* Significant differences were assumed at P < 0.05
For normally distributed variables (FT3 and FT4), we used a Student’s t test for independent samples and a paired-samples t test to investigate the differences within and between groups, respectively. For non-normally-distributed variables, we used a Mann–Whitney U test and a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test to assess the differences within and between groups, respectively
Fig. 2Plasma selenium levels in both groups over 90 days. Values are expressed as means and standard deviations with 95 % CI. n = 77. Values were measured for both groups on days 0, 30, 60 and 90. Excluding baseline levels, values differed significantly within and between groups at every time point
Fig. 3Serum total cholesterol levels in both groups over 90 days. Values are expressed as means and standard deviations with 95 % CI, n = 77. Values were measured for both groups on days 0, 30, 60 and 90. Values differed significantly only for the Brazil nut group at the T90