Literature DB >> 26077455

Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy.

Robert E Sedlack1, Walter J Coyle2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool (MCSAT) has previously been used to describe learning curves and competency benchmarks for colonoscopy; however, these data were limited to a single training center. The newer Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy (ACE) tool is a refinement of the MCSAT tool put forth by the Training Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, intended to include additional important quality metrics. The goal of this study is to validate the changes made by updating this tool and establish more generalizable and reliable learning curves and competency benchmarks for colonoscopy by examining a larger national cohort of trainees.
METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter trial, gastroenterology fellows at all stages of training had their core cognitive and motor skills in colonoscopy assessed by staff. Evaluations occurred at set intervals of every 50 procedures throughout the 2013 to 2014 academic year. Skills were graded by using the ACE tool, which uses a 4-point grading scale defining the continuum from novice to competent. Average learning curves for each skill were established at each interval in training and competency benchmarks for each skill were established using the contrasting groups method.
RESULTS: Ninety-three gastroenterology fellows at 10 U.S. academic institutions had 1061 colonoscopies assessed by using the ACE tool. Average scores of 3.5 were found to be inclusive of all minimal competency thresholds identified for each core skill. Cecal intubation times of less than 15 minutes and independent cecal intubation rates of 90% were also identified as additional competency thresholds during analysis. The average fellow achieved all cognitive and motor skill endpoints by 250 procedures, with >90% surpassing these thresholds by 300 procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Nationally generalizable learning curves for colonoscopy skills in gastroenterology fellows are described. Average ACE scores of 3.5, cecal intubation rates of 90%, and intubation times less than 15 minutes are recommended as minimal competency criteria. On average, it takes 250 procedures to achieve competence in colonoscopy. The thresholds found in this multicenter cohort by using the ACE tool are nearly identical to the previously established MCSAT benchmarks and are consistent with recent gastroenterology training recommendations but far higher than current training requirements in other specialties.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077455     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Training in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Keith Siau; Neil D Hawkes; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09

2.  Who Performs Colonoscopy? Workforce Trends Over Space and Time.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Michele J Josey; Lee R Mobley; Davidson O Nicholas; Donna B Jeffe; Cassie Odahowski; Janice C Probst; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Objective Differences in Colonoscopy Technique Between Trainee and Expert Endoscopists Using the Colonoscopy Force Monitor.

Authors:  Alexander R Ende; Piet De Groen; Bryan L Balmadrid; Joo Ha Hwang; John Inadomi; Tomasz Wojtera; Vladimir Egorov; Noune Sarvazyan; Louis Korman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prospective comparison of an adult, an intermediate pediatric and a long pediatric colonoscope in the training process of gastrointestinal fellows to achieve high-quality practice in colonoscopy.

Authors:  George Tribonias; Athanasios-Dimitrios Bacasis; Yoriaki Komeda; George Lyrakos; Ioannis Giotis; Niki Daferera; Dimitrios Charisis; Margarita-Eleni Manola; Dimitrios Karapiperis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 5.  Endoscopy training in COVID-19: Challenges and hope for a better age.

Authors:  Chieh Sian Koo; Kewin Tien Ho Siah; Calvin Jianyi Koh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.369

6.  Polypectomy: No training, No cancer prevention!

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-03

7.  Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees.

Authors:  Emad Qayed; Ravi Vora; Sara Levy; Roberd M Bostick
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 8.  The assessment of endosonographers in training.

Authors:  Per Hedenström; Riadh Sadik
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  GAPS-EUS: a new and reliable tool for the assessment of basic skills and performance in EUS among endosonography trainees.

Authors:  Per Hedenström; Giovanni Marasco; Leonardo Henry Eusebi; Bjorn Lindkvist; Riadh Sadik
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06

10.  Contrasting groups' standard setting for consequences analysis in validity studies: reporting considerations.

Authors:  Morten Jørgensen; Lars Konge; Yousif Subhi
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.