Literature DB >> 26077077

Effect of incomplete withdrawal of a closed-suction catheter on airway resistance.

Sheng-Yuan Ruan1, Feng-Ching Lin, Chun-Ta Huang, Shih-Chi Ku, Huey-Dong Wu.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26077077     DOI： 10.1007/s00134-015-3886-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN： 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Comparison of open and closed suction on safety, efficacy and nursing time in a paediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Janine Evans; Sophie Syddall; Warwick Butt; Sharon Kinney
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 3.  Impact of closed versus open tracheal suctioning systems for mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kuriyama; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Jun Fujinaga; Tadaaki Takada
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene P Jongerden; Maroeska M Rovers; Mieke H Grypdonck; Marc J Bonten
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Closed versus open suctioning techniques.

Authors:  S M Maggiore; E Iacobone; G Zito; C Conti; M Antonelli; R Proietti
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.