Literature DB >> 12029246

Closed versus open suctioning techniques.

S M Maggiore1, E Iacobone, G Zito, C Conti, M Antonelli, R Proietti.   

Abstract

Airway suctioning is classically performed with the disconnection of the patient from the ventilator and the introduction of the suction catheter into the endotracheal tube. Alternatively, it can be accomplished with a closed suctioning system included in the ventilatory circuit, allowing to introduce the suction catheter into the airways without disconnecting the patient from the ventilator. The closed-suction system has some advantages compared to the conventional, open-suction technique. It can be helpful in limiting environmental, personnel and patient contamination and in preventing the loss of lung volume and the alveolar derecruitment associated with standard suctioning in the severely hypoxemic patients. However, the impact of the closed system on ventilator-associated pneumonia as well as its cost-effectiveness and the influence of such devices with ventilatory support remain to be assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12029246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The impact of endotracheal suctioning on gas exchange and hemodynamics during lung-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Paula Caramez; Guilherme Schettino; Klaudiusz Suchodolski; Tomoyo Nishida; R Scott Harris; Atul Malhotra; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Regional lung derecruitment after endotracheal suction during volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation: a study using electric impedance tomography.

Authors:  Sophie Lindgren; Helena Odenstedt; Cecilia Olegård; Sören Söndergaard; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Endotracheal suctioning, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and costs: open or closed issue?

Authors:  Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Effect of incomplete withdrawal of a closed-suction catheter on airway resistance.

Authors:  Sheng-Yuan Ruan; Feng-Ching Lin; Chun-Ta Huang; Shih-Chi Ku; Huey-Dong Wu
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Effectiveness and side effects of closed and open suctioning: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  Sophie Lindgren; Birgitta Almgren; Marieann Högman; Sven Lethvall; Erik Houltz; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Differential Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning on Gas Exchanges in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure under Pressure-Controlled and Volume-Controlled Ventilation.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Liu; Yan Jin; Tao Ma; Bo Qu; Zhi Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Hyperinflation deteriorates arterial oxygenation and lung injury in a rabbit model of ARDS with repeated open endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  Junko Kamiyama; Subrina Jesmin; Hideaki Sakuramoto; Nobutake Shimojyo; Majedul Islam; Keiichi Hagiya; Masato Sugano; Takeshi Unoki; Masami Oki; Satoru Kawano; Taro Mizutani
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Foreign body blocking closed circuit suction catheter: An unusual cause of retained tracheal secretions in a mechanically ventilated patient.

Authors:  Shubhdeep Kaur; Sukeerat Singh; Ruchi Gupta; Tripat Bindra
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2014-01

9.  Fractured closed suction catheter: an unusual cause of endobronchial obstruction in a ventilated patient.

Authors:  M P Rogan; B Marsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Repeated open endotracheal suctioning causes gradual desaturation but does not exacerbate lung injury compared to closed endotracheal suctioning in a rabbit model of ARDS.

Authors:  Hideaki Sakuramoto; Nobutake Shimojo; Subrina Jesmin; Takeshi Unoki; Junko Kamiyama; Masami Oki; Ken Miya; Satoru Kawano; Taro Mizutani
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.