| Literature DB >> 26076589 |
Allison M Gardner1, Brian F Allan2,3, Lauren A Frisbie4, Ephantus J Muturi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exotic invasive plants alter the structure and function of native ecosystems and may influence the distribution and abundance of arthropod disease vectors by modifying habitat quality. This study investigated how invasive plants alter the ecology of Culex pipiens, an important vector of West Nile virus (WNV) in northeastern and midwestern regions of the United States.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26076589 PMCID: PMC4469247 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0941-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Mean (±1 standard error) for Culex pipiens egg rafts collected in oviposition traps per day from June 24 to August 5, 2013 (6 weeks) by leaf detritus treatment. Letters indicate significant pairwise differences at α = 0.05
Fig. 2Mean (±1 standard error) for Culex pipiens male and female emergence rates across intraspecific competition by leaf detritus treatments. Letters indicate significant pairwise differences at α = 0.05
Fig. 3Mean (±1 standard error) for Culex pipiens female and male time to eclosion and wing length across intraspecific competition by leaf detritus treatments. The following treatments were excluded because no females survived to eclosion: all multiflora rose treatments; blackberry: 20 larvae and 40 larvae; autumn olive: 40 larvae
Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) for the effect of leaf detritus species and intraspecific competition on Culex pipiens female and male time to eclosion (days) and wing length (mm). Standardized canonical coefficients (SCCs) describe the relative contribution of each life history trait to the multivariate effect
| Sex | Variable | df | Pillai’s trace | P | SCCs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclosion time | Wing length | |||||
| Female | Leaf | 8 | 22.07 | <0.001* | 1.41 | −0.33 |
| Competition | 4 | 18.81 | <0.001* | 1.01 | −0.94 | |
| Leaf*Competition | 16 | 5.05 | <0.001* | −0.92 | 1.02 | |
| Male | Leaf | 8 | 26.52 | <0.001* | 1.25 | −0.27 |
| Competition | 4 | 22.79 | <0.001* | −0.44 | 1.21 | |
| Leaf*Competition | 16 | 3.03 | <0.001* | 0.38 | 1.46 | |
Asterisks indicate statistically significant effects at α = 0.05
Fig. 4Mean (±1 standard error) for cumulative abundance and Shannon’s diversity index (H) of bacteria by leaf detritus treatment. Upper case letters indicate significant pairwise differences at α = 0.05 for bacterial diversity; lower case letters indicate significant pairwise differences for bacterial abundance
Multiple linear regressions for the effect of total bacterial abundance, bacterial diversity, larval density (10, 20, and 40 larvae), and their interaction on Culex pipiens female and male emergence rate and oviposition rates
| Variable | Emergence rate | Oviposition rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | P | T | P | |
| Intercept | −1.22 | 0.2282 | −1.37 | 0.1877 |
| Abundance | 4.78 | <0.0001* | −0.75 | 0.4644 |
| Diversity | 0.59 | 0.5562 | 2.20 | 0.0411* |
| Density | −2.76 | 0.0073* | - | - |
| Abundance*Diversity | −2.71 | 0.0090* | −0.77 | 0.4534 |
| Abundance*Density | −0.73 | 0.4706 | - | - |
| Diversity*Density | 0.03 | 0.9794 | - | - |
| Abundance*Diversity*Density | −0.02 | 0.9836 | - | - |
Asterisks indicate statistically significant effects at α = 0.05
Multivariate linear regressions for the effect of phylum-level bacterial composition, larval density (10, 20, and 40 larvae), and their interaction on Culex pipiens female and male emergence and oviposition rates
| Variable | Emergence rate | Oviposition rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | P | T | P | |
| Intercept | 3.80 | 0.0003* | 7.18 | <0.0001* |
| α-proteobacteria | −1.69 | 0.0958 | −0.36 | 0.7258 |
| Bacteroidetes | 3.86 | 0.0003* | −2.10 | 0.0580 |
| Firmicutes | −1.07 | 0.2867 | 0.60 | 0.5572 |
| β-proteobacteria | −2.75 | 0.0077* | 0.93 | 0.3726 |
| Acidobacteria | 1.98 | 0.0437* | 0.21 | 0.8338 |
| γ-proteobacteria | 0.49 | 0.6263 | −0.39 | 0.7037 |
| Actinobacteria | −0.22 | 0.8273 | 1.43 | 0.1788 |
| Density | −3.03 | 0.0035* | - | - |
| Density*α-proteobacteria | 0.08 | 0.9365 | - | - |
| Density*Bacteroidetes | 2.39 | 0.0196* | - | - |
| Density*Firmicutes | 1.06 | 0.2944 | - | - |
| Density*β-proteobacteria | −1.44 | 0.1560 | - | - |
| Density*Acidobacteria | 0.97 | 0.3370 | - | - |
| Density*γ-proteobacteria | 0.20 | 0.8437 | - | - |
| Density*Actinobacteria | −0.67 | 0.5068 | - | - |
Asterisks indicate statistically significant effects at α = 0.05