Literature DB >> 15691009

An update on the potential of north American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit West Nile Virus.

Michael J Turell1, David J Dohm, Michael R Sardelis, Monica L Oguinn, Theodore G Andreadis, Jamie A Blow.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since first discovered in the New York City area in 1999, West Nile virus (WNV) has become established over much of the continental United States and has been responsible for >10,000 cases of severe disease and 400 human fatalities, as well as thousands of fatal infections in horses. To develop appropriate surveillance and control strategies, the identification of which mosquito species are competent vectors and how various factors influence their ability to transmit this virus must be determined. Therefore, we evaluated numerous mosquito species for their ability to transmit WNV under laboratory conditions. This report contains data for several mosquito species not reported previously, as well as a summary of transmission data compiled from previously reported studies. Mosquitoes were allowed to feed on chickens infected with WNV isolated from a crow that died during the 1999 outbreak in New York City. These mosquitoes were tested approximately 2 wk later to determine infection, dissemination, and transmission rates. All Culex species tested were competent vectors in the laboratory and varied from highly efficient vectors (e.g., Culex tarsalis Coquillett) to moderately efficient ones (e.g., Culex nigripalpus Theobald). Nearly all of the Culex species tested could serve as efficient enzootic or amplifying vectors for WNV. Several container-breeding Aedes and Ochlerotatus species were highly efficient vectors under laboratory conditions, but because of their feeding preferences, would probably not be involved in the maintenance of WNV in nature. However, they would be potential bridge vectors between the avian-Culex cycle and mammalian hosts. In contrast, most of the surface pool-breeding Aedes and Ochlerotatus species tested were relatively inefficient vectors under laboratory conditions and would probably not play a significant role in transmitting WNV in nature. In determining the potential for a mosquito species to become involved in transmitting WNV, it is necessary to consider not only its laboratory vector competence but also its abundance, host-feeding preference, involvement with other viruses with similar transmission cycles, and whether WNV has been isolated from this species under natural conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15691009     DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/42.1.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  184 in total

Review 1.  A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: ecology, public health risks, and control options.

Authors:  Jolyon M Medlock; Kayleigh M Hansford; Francis Schaffner; Veerle Versteirt; Guy Hendrickx; Herve Zeller; Wim Van Bortel
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Spatial and temporal variation in vector competence of Culex pipiens and Cx. restuans mosquitoes for West Nile virus.

Authors:  A Marm Kilpatrick; Dina M Fonseca; Gregory D Ebel; Michael R Reddy; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF WEST NILE VIRUS ON CALIFORNIA BIRDS.

Authors:  Sarah S Wheeler; Christopher M Barker; Ying Fang; M Veronica Armijos; Brian D Carroll; Stan Husted; Wesley O Johnson; William K Reisen
Journal:  Condor       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Relationships between infection, dissemination, and transmission of West Nile virus RNA in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Stephanie L Richards; Sheri L Anderson; Cynthia C Lord; Chelsea T Smartt; Walter J Tabachnick
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Mosquito Larvae in Tires from Mississippi, United States: The Efficacy of Abiotic and Biotic Parameters in Predicting Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Mosquito Populations and Communities.

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Alisa A Abuzeineh; Nnaemeka F Ezeakacha; Stephanie S Schelble; William C Glasgow; Stephen D Flanagan; Jeffrey J Skiff; Ashton Reeves; Kevin Kuehn
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.278

6.  Asymmetrical competition and patterns of abundance of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Katie S Costanzo; Kimberly Mormann; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Host choice and West Nile virus infection rates in blood-fed mosquitoes, including members of the Culex pipiens complex, from Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee, 2002-2003.

Authors:  Harry M Savage; Deepak Aggarwal; Charles S Apperson; Charles R Katholi; Emily Gordon; Hassan K Hassan; Michael Anderson; Dawn Charnetzky; Larry McMillen; Emily A Unnasch; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.133

8.  Stormwater drains and catch basins as sources for production of Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Roger Arana-Guardia; Carlos M Baak-Baak; María Alba Loroño-Pino; Carlos Machain-Williams; Barry J Beaty; Lars Eisen; Julián E García-Rejón
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.112

9.  The roles of mosquito and bird communities on the prevalence of West Nile virus in urban wetland and residential habitats.

Authors:  Brian J Johnson; Kristin Munafo; Laura Shappell; Nellie Tsipoura; Mark Robson; Joan Ehrenfeld; Michael V K Sukhdeo
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.005

10.  Arboviruses in North Dakota, 2003-2006.

Authors:  John F Anderson; Andy J Main; Philip M Armstrong; Theodore G Andreadis; Francis J Ferrandino
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.