OBJECTIVE: Although doctors' discharge summaries (DS) are important forms of communication between the physicians in patient care, deficits in the quality of DS are common. This review aims to answer the following question: according to the literature, how can the quality of DS be improved by (1) interventions; (2) reviews and guidelines of regulatory bodies; and (3) other practical recommendations? METHODS: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The scientific papers on optimizing the quality of DS (n = 234) are heterogeneous and do not allow any meta-analysis. The interventional studies revealed that a structured approach of writing, educational training including feedback and the use of a checklist are effective methods. Guidelines are helpful for outlining the key characteristics of DS. Additionally, the articles in the literature provided practical proposals on improving form, structure, clinical content, treatment recommendations, follow-up plan, medications and changes, addressees, patient data, length, language, dictation, electronic processing and timeliness of DS. CONCLUSION: The literature review revealed various possibilities for improving the quality of DS.
OBJECTIVE: Although doctors' discharge summaries (DS) are important forms of communication between the physicians in patient care, deficits in the quality of DS are common. This review aims to answer the following question: according to the literature, how can the quality of DS be improved by (1) interventions; (2) reviews and guidelines of regulatory bodies; and (3) other practical recommendations? METHODS: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: The scientific papers on optimizing the quality of DS (n = 234) are heterogeneous and do not allow any meta-analysis. The interventional studies revealed that a structured approach of writing, educational training including feedback and the use of a checklist are effective methods. Guidelines are helpful for outlining the key characteristics of DS. Additionally, the articles in the literature provided practical proposals on improving form, structure, clinical content, treatment recommendations, follow-up plan, medications and changes, addressees, patient data, length, language, dictation, electronic processing and timeliness of DS. CONCLUSION: The literature review revealed various possibilities for improving the quality of DS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Discharge summary; documentation; medical education; problem-oriented medical records; process quality
Authors: Eric D Moyer; Erik B Lehman; Matthew D Bolton; Jennifer Goldstein; Ariana R Pichardo-Lowden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sophie Fürstenberg; Kristina Schick; Jana Deppermann; Sarah Prediger; Pascal O Berberat; Martina Kadmon; Sigrid Harendza Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 2.463