Literature DB >> 26071431

How big should the pilot study for my cluster randomised trial be?

Sandra M Eldridge1, Ceire E Costelloe2, Brennan C Kahan2, Gillian A Lancaster3, Sally M Kerry2.   

Abstract

There is currently a lot of interest in pilot studies conducted in preparation for randomised controlled trials. This paper focuses on sample size requirements for external pilot studies for cluster randomised trials. We consider how large an external pilot study needs to be to assess key parameters for input to the main trial sample size calculation when the primary outcome is continuous, and to estimate rates, for example recruitment rates, with reasonable precision. We used simulation to provide the distribution of the expected number of clusters for the main trial under different assumptions about the natural cluster size, intra-cluster correlation, eventual cluster size in the main trial, and various decisions made at the piloting stage. We chose intra-cluster correlation values and pilot study size to reflect those commonly reported in the literature. Our results show that estimates of sample size required for the main trial are likely to be biased downwards and very imprecise unless the pilot study includes large numbers of clusters and individual participants. We conclude that pilot studies will usually be too small to estimate parameters required for estimating a sample size for a main cluster randomised trial (e.g. the intra-cluster correlation coefficient) with sufficient precision and too small to provide reliable estimates of rates for process measures such as recruitment or follow-up rates.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomised trial; intra-cluster correlation; pilot; sample size

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26071431     DOI: 10.1177/0962280215588242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  41 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT.

Authors:  Andrew I Gumley; Simon Bradstreet; John Ainsworth; Stephanie Allan; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Maximillian Birchwood; Andrew Briggs; Sandra Bucci; Sue Cotton; Lidia Engel; Paul French; Reeva Lederman; Shôn Lewis; Matthew Machin; Graeme MacLennan; Hamish McLeod; Nicola McMeekin; Cathy Mihalopoulos; Emma Morton; John Norrie; Frank Reilly; Matthias Schwannauer; Swaran P Singh; Suresh Sundram; Andrew Thompson; Chris Williams; Alison Yung; Lorna Aucott; John Farhall; John Gleeson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.106

3.  Evaluating the Public Climate School-A School-Based Programme to Promote Climate Awareness and Action in Students: Protocol of a Cluster-Controlled Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael Eichinger; Myriam Bechtoldt; Inga Thao My Bui; Julius Grund; Jan Keller; Ashley G Lau; Shuyan Liu; Michael Neuber; Felix Peter; Carina Pohle; Gerhard Reese; Fabian Schäfer; Stephan Heinzel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for symptom management in oncology practice through the SIMPRO research consortium: a protocol for a pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation multi-center cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Sandra Wong; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Jessica Bian; Don S Dizon; Hannah Hazard Jenkins; Hajime Uno; Christine Cronin; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.728

5.  Optimal two-stage sampling for mean estimation in multilevel populations when cluster size is informative.

Authors:  Francesco Innocenti; Math Jjm Candel; Frans Es Tan; Gerard Jp van Breukelen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Michael D Hughes
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Claire L Chan; Michael J Campbell; Christine M Bond; Sally Hopewell; Lehana Thabane; Gillian A Lancaster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-24

8.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Claire L Chan; Michael J Campbell; Christine M Bond; Sally Hopewell; Lehana Thabane; Gillian A Lancaster
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-10-21

9.  Cultural adaptation of a children's weight management programme for Bangladeshi and Pakistani families in the UK: a cluster-randomised feasibility study protocol.

Authors:  Miranda Pallan; Tania Griffin; Emma Lancashire; Kiya Hurley; Jacqueline Blissett; Emma Frew; Paramjit Gill; Laura Griffith; Karla Hemming; Kate Jolly; Eleanor McGee; Charlene Mulhern; Jayne Parry; Janice L Thompson; Peymane Adab
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  Progression from external pilot to definitive randomised controlled trial: a methodological review of progression criteria reporting.

Authors:  Katie Mellor; Saskia Eddy; Nicholas Peckham; Christine M Bond; Michael J Campbell; Gillian A Lancaster; Lehana Thabane; Sandra M Eldridge; Susan J Dutton; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.