Literature DB >> 26071418

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011.

M De Rycke1, F Belva2, V Goossens3, C Moutou4, S B SenGupta5, J Traeger-Synodinos6, E Coonen7.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How do data in the 13th annual data collection (Data XIII) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium compare with the cumulative data for collections I-XII? SUMMARY ANSWER: The 13th retrospective collection represents valuable data on PGD/PGS cycles, pregnancies and children: the main trend observed is the decrease in the routine implementation of PGS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 1999, the PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 12 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were collected from each participating centre using a FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-11). Separate predesigned FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar year 2010 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2011). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Data were submitted by 62 centres (full PGD Consortium members). The submitted data were thoroughly analysed to identify incomplete data entries and corrections were requested from the participating centres. Records remaining with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For data collection XIII, 62 centres reported data for 5780 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1503 pregnancies and 1152 babies born. A total of 1071 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 108 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1574 OR for monogenic diseases, 2979 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 48 OR for social sexing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings apply to the 62 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGD. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The annual data collections provide an important resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESHRE PGD Consortium; PCR; PGD; fluorescence in situ hybridization; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26071418     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  35 in total

1.  The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the patient affected by congenital contractural arachnodactyly and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Linjun Chen; Zhenyu Diao; Zhipeng Xu; Jianjun Zhou; Wanjun Wang; Jie Li; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis-should we use ICSI for all?

Authors:  Baruch Feldman; Adva Aizer; Masha Brengauz; Keren Dotan; Jacob Levron; Eyal Schiff; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis.

Authors:  Liron Bar-El; Yael Kalma; Mira Malcov; Tamar Schwartz; Shaul Raviv; Tania Cohen; Hadar Amir; Yoni Cohen; Adi Reches; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Inverse PCR to perform long-distance haplotyping: main applications to improve preimplantation genetic diagnosis in hemophilia.

Authors:  Miguel Martín Abelleyro; Vanina Daniela Marchione; Micaela Palmitelli; Claudia Pamela Radic; Daniela Neme; Irene Beatriz Larripa; Enrique Medina-Acosta; Carlos Daniel De Brasi; Liliana Carmen Rossetti
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Keiichi Kato; Naoki Aoyama; Nami Kawasaki; Hiroko Hayashi; Tang Xiaohui; Takashi Abe; Tomoko Kuroda
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 6.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Preimplantation genetic testing with HLA matching: from counseling to birth and beyond.

Authors:  M De Rycke; A De Vos; F Belva; V Berckmoes; M Bonduelle; A Buysse; K Keymolen; I Liebaers; J Nekkebroeck; P Verdyck; W Verpoest
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  The performance of MALBAC and MDA methods in the identification of concurrent mutations and aneuploidy screening to diagnose beta-thalassaemia disorders at the single- and multiple-cell levels.

Authors:  WeiQiang Liu; HuiMin Zhang; Dan Hu; SiJia Lu; XiaoFang Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 10.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.