Narissa J Nonzee1,2, Daiva M Ragas3, Thanh Ha Luu3, Ava M Phisuthikul3, Laura Tom1, XinQi Dong4, Melissa A Simon1,2,3,5. 1. 1 Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois. 2. 2 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois. 3. 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois. 4. 4 Rush Institute for Healthy Aging, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, Illinois. 5. 5 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Narrowing the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in breast and cervical cancer requires an in-depth understanding of motivation for adherence to cancer screening and follow-up care. To inform patient-centered interventions, this study aimed to identify reasons why low-income women adhered to or delayed breast or cervical cancer screening, follow-up and treatment despite access to cancer care-related services. METHODS: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted among women with access to cancer care-related services receiving care at an academic cancer center, federally qualified health centers, or free clinics in the Chicago metropolitan area. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for themes related to rationales for adherence. RESULTS: Among 138 participants, most were African American (46%) or Hispanic (36%), English speaking (70%), and between ages 41 and 65 years (64%). Primary drivers of nonadherence included lack of knowledge of resources, denial or fear, competing obligations, and embarrassment. Facilitators included abnormality identification, patient activation, provider-initiated actions, and motivation from family or friends. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting increased adherence to care among low-income and ethnic minority women should direct efforts to proactive, culturally and patient-informed education that enables patients to access resources and use the health care system, address misconceptions about cancer, ensure health care providers' communication of screening guidelines, and leverage the patient's social support network.
INTRODUCTION: Narrowing the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in breast and cervical cancer requires an in-depth understanding of motivation for adherence to cancer screening and follow-up care. To inform patient-centered interventions, this study aimed to identify reasons why low-income women adhered to or delayed breast or cervical cancer screening, follow-up and treatment despite access to cancer care-related services. METHODS: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted among women with access to cancer care-related services receiving care at an academic cancer center, federally qualified health centers, or free clinics in the Chicago metropolitan area. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for themes related to rationales for adherence. RESULTS: Among 138 participants, most were African American (46%) or Hispanic (36%), English speaking (70%), and between ages 41 and 65 years (64%). Primary drivers of nonadherence included lack of knowledge of resources, denial or fear, competing obligations, and embarrassment. Facilitators included abnormality identification, patient activation, provider-initiated actions, and motivation from family or friends. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting increased adherence to care among low-income and ethnic minority women should direct efforts to proactive, culturally and patient-informed education that enables patients to access resources and use the health care system, address misconceptions about cancer, ensure health care providers' communication of screening guidelines, and leverage the patient's social support network.
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Nancy Breen; Sally W Vernon; Helen I Meissner; Andrew N Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christine B Weldon; Sarah M Friedewald; Swati A Kulkarni; Melissa A Simon; Ruth C Carlos; Jonathan B Strauss; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Julia R Trosman Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: David Boyce-Fappiano; Kevin A Nguyen; Olsi Gjyshi; Gohar Manzar; Chike O Abana; Ann H Klopp; Mitchell Kamrava; Peter F Orio; Nikhil G Thaker; Firas Mourtada; Puja Venkat; Albert J Chang Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-09-22
Authors: Julia R Trosman; Ruth C Carlos; Melissa A Simon; Debra L Madden; William J Gradishar; Al B Benson; Bruce D Rapkin; Elisa S Weiss; Ilana F Gareen; Lynne I Wagner; Seema A Khan; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Christine B Weldon Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jennifer L Hay; Emily C Zabor; Julie Kumar; Debra Brennessel; Margaret M Kemeny; Erica I Lubetkin Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Janiece L Taylor; Brittany F Drazich; Laken Roberts; Safiyyah Okoye; Emerald Rivers; Jennifer Wenzel; Rebecca Wright; Mary Catherine Beach; Sarah L Szanton Journal: J Women Aging Date: 2020-05-31