| Literature DB >> 26069451 |
Manish L Raorane1, Isaiah M Pabuayon1, Berta Miro1, Rajesh Kalladan2, Mohammad Reza-Hajirezai3, Rowena H Oane1, Arvind Kumar1, Nese Sreenivasulu4, Amelia Henry1, Ajay Kohli1.
Abstract
There is a widespread consensus that drought will mostly affect present and future agriculture negatively. Generating drought-tolerant crops is thus a high priority. However complicated the underlying genetic and regulatory networks for differences in plant performance under stress are, they would be reflected in straightforward differences in primary metabolites. This is because primary metabolites such as amino acids and sugars form the building blocks of all pathways and processes for growth, development, reproduction, and environmental responses. Comparison of such differences was undertaken between the parental line and a near-isogenic line ofEntities:
Keywords: Carbon; Drought; Flag leaf; Grain yield; Metabolomics; Nitrogen; QTL; Remobilization; Rice; Root
Year: 2015 PMID: 26069451 PMCID: PMC4451464 DOI: 10.1007/s11032-015-0322-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Breed ISSN: 1380-3743 Impact factor: 2.589
Fig. 1Root and panicle morphology of V, WR, and 481-B under drought. a Roots and b panicles of 481-B showed increased branching than V and WR. Red arrows (primary branches) and blue arrows (secondary branches) are used to indicate increased panicle branches in the NIL 481-B
Fig. 2Boxplots of contents of specific metabolites in roots, flag leaves, and spikelets in well-watered and drought-stress conditions. a Boxplot of starch, glucose, fructose and sucrose in roots; b boxplot of total free amino acids in roots; c boxplot of glucose, fructose and sucrose in flag leaves; d boxplot of glutamate content in flag leaves; e boxplot of proline content in flag leaves; f boxplot of starch content in spikelets; g boxplot of sucrose content in spikelets. Components are represented in the horizontal axis and quantities in the vertical axis. Each vertical white line represents a metabolite or treatment as indicated, and the three boxes closest to it are the three genotypes: Vandana on the white line is coded in black, 481-B on the left of the line in red, and Way Rarem on the right of the line in green (as in the bottom right-hand side legend). In each box, the horizontal line represents the median of the data, the upper quartile represents the 75th percentiles, and the lower quartile represents the 25th percentile. The whiskers represented the 95 and 5 % of the data and the circles, when present, signified the outliers. Starch, glucose, fructose, and sucrose were measured in µmol/g fresh weight, while glutamate, proline, and total free amino acids were measured in pmol/mg
Fig. 3QRT-PCR results for selected amino acid synthesis genes. Genes involved in the metabolic pathways of serine, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, alanine, and proline metabolism were assessed for transcript abundance in the roots of Vandana (V), Way Rarem (WR), and the NIL 481-B. The y axis represents fold change in expression. Bars in green show transcript under well-watered conditions, and those in red indicate abundance under drought. The genes assessed were a 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (3PGD), b glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GOGAT), c glutamine synthetase (GS), d alanine glyoxalate aminotransferase (AGAT), e glutamate–glyoxylate aminotransferase (GGAT), f, h pyrroline 5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), g, i pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR), j glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase (G1PAT), k sucrose synthase (SS), l adenylate kinase (AK), m, n actin and o tubulin. The average measurement and standard error is shown for each sample (n = 3)
Fig. 4Comparison between Vandana and 481-B leaf characteristics. a Photosynthesis rate of 481-B and Vandana showed no difference under well-watered conditions, but under stress b 481-B had a lower photosynthesis rate than Vandana. The average measurement and standard error is shown for each of the samples (n = 3). c Stomatal conductance was lower for 481-B under stress. The average measurement and standard error is shown for each genotype (n = 3)
Results of Welch’s t test comparing the means of Vandana and 481-B for the 20 metabolites, total amino acids, carbohydrates, C, N, and C/N analyzed in flag leaf tissue
| Component |
| MeanV | SDV | Mean481B | SD481B |
|
|
| CI.95 | Tukey HSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His | 6 | 14.02 | 7.71 | 12.26 | 1.60 | −0.39 | 2.17 | 0.733 | −19.92 | 16.39 | |
| Asn | 6 | 82.38 | 63.69 | 21.02 | 5.15 | −1.66 | 2.03 | 0.237 | −218.16 | 95.43 | |
| Ser | 6 | 1.35 | 0.11 | 3.28 | 0.20 | 14.83 | 3.18 | 0.000 | 1.52 | 2.32 | *** |
| Gln | 6 | 7.75 | 3.77 | 2.69 | 0.95 | −2.26 | 2.26 | 0.138 | −13.74 | 3.62 | |
| Gly | 6 | 2.86 | 0.78 | 4.00 | 0.54 | 2.10 | 3.55 | 0.113 | −0.45 | 2.73 | |
| Asp | 6 | 1.34 | 0.67 | 1.27 | 0.19 | −0.19 | 2.31 | 0.863 | −1.59 | 1.44 | |
| Glu | 6 | 0.74 | 0.08 | 0.54 | 0.03 | −3.95 | 2.63 | 0.037 | −0.37 | −0.02 | |
| Thr | 6 | 2.02 | 0.49 | 3.87 | 0.03 | 6.51 | 2.02 | 0.022 | 0.63 | 3.05 | ** |
| Ala | 6 | 0.84 | 0.19 | 2.37 | 0.39 | 6.16 | 2.96 | 0.009 | 0.73 | 2.33 | ** |
| GABA | 6 | 2.87 | 0.98 | 4.22 | 1.78 | 1.15 | 3.10 | 0.331 | −2.31 | 5.01 | |
| Pro | 6 | 54.65 | 12.03 | 8.79 | 4.63 | −6.16 | 2.58 | 0.013 | −71.89 | −19.85 | *** |
| Lys | 6 | 1.01 | 0.37 | 3.49 | 0.77 | 5.04 | 2.89 | 0.016 | 0.88 | 4.08 | *** |
| Val | 6 | 2.19 | 1.10 | 5.18 | 0.24 | 4.60 | 2.18 | 0.037 | 0.41 | 5.57 | *** |
| Ile | 6 | 9.13 | 5.13 | 4.07 | 0.99 | −1.68 | 2.15 | 0.227 | −17.20 | 7.08 | |
| Leu | 6 | 2.21 | 0.89 | 3.55 | 0.98 | 1.77 | 3.96 | 0.152 | −0.77 | 3.47 | *** |
| Phe | 6 | 1.46 | 0.41 | 4.76 | 1.02 | 5.20 | 2.63 | 0.019 | 1.11 | 5.49 | * |
| Total aa | 6 | 1.88 | 0.51 | 1.41 | 0.14 | −1.52 | 2.32 | 0.250 | −1.62 | 0.69 | |
| Starch | 6 | 2.54 | 0.37 | 1.05 | 0.11 | −6.69 | 2.34 | 0.014 | −2.32 | −0.65 | |
| Glucose | 6 | 7.67 | 2.19 | 4.50 | 2.35 | −1.71 | 3.98 | 0.163 | −8.33 | 1.99 | |
| Fructose | 6 | 1.78 | 0.20 | 5.79 | 0.40 | 15.53 | 2.94 | 0.001 | 3.18 | 4.84 | |
| Sucrose | 6 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 3.34 | 2.62 | 0.054 | −0.01 | 0.73 | |
| N | 6 | 0.89 | 0.17 | 0.89 | 0.15 | 0 | 3.96 | 1 | −0.36 | 0.36 | |
| C | 6 | 1.19 | 0.02 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 1.63 | 2.36 | 0.226 | −0.07 | 0.19 | |
| C/N | 6 | 1.38 | 0.32 | 1.41 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 3.37 | 0.875 | −0.61 | 0.68 | |
Columns represent (from left to right): components; total number of samples analyzed (n); mean and standard deviation (SD) for Vandana and 481B, respectively (columns 3–6); Welch’s t value (t); degrees of freedom (df); p value; and the confidence interval at 95 % probability (CI.95). The values used for the calculation are the ratio of each component’s content in drought versus well-watered conditions, representing the genotypic response under drought. The last column represents the significance level obtained from the Tukey HSD test that compared Vandana, 481B, and Way Rarem (significance values are *, **, and *** representing 0.05, 0.01, and <0.001, respectively). Gray-shaded cells are components significant by Welch’s t test at p < 0.05. The comparison between the Welch’s t test and the Tukey HSD highlighted differences in the significance of some components
Results of Welch’s t test comparing the means of Vandana and 481-B for the 20 metabolites, total amino acids, carbohydrates, C, N, and C/N analyzed in root tissue
| Component |
| MeanV | SDV | Mean481B | sd481B |
|
|
| CI.95 | Tukey HSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His | 6 | 11.81 | 4.61 | 58.97 | 5.75 | 11.08 | 3.82 | 0.000 | 35.12 | 59.21 | *** |
| Asn | 6 | 59.98 | 2.67 | 184.96 | 84.36 | 2.56 | 2.00 | 0.124 | −84.28 | 334.23 | |
| Ser | 6 | 5.56 | 1.26 | 24.52 | 8.21 | 3.95 | 2.09 | 0.054 | −0.81 | 38.74 | ** |
| Gln | 6 | 4.82 | 2.21 | 20.83 | 2.90 | 7.61 | 3.74 | 0.002 | 10.00 | 22.01 | *** |
| Gly | 6 | 1.20 | 0.45 | 1.62 | 0.57 | 1.01 | 3.79 | 0.374 | −0.76 | 1.60 | |
| Asp | 6 | 6.54 | 0.28 | 20.87 | 3.71 | 6.68 | 2.02 | 0.021 | 5.19 | 23.46 | * |
| Glu | 6 | 4.28 | 1.10 | 8.68 | 0.62 | 6.04 | 3.14 | 0.008 | 2.14 | 6.66 | *** |
| Thr | 6 | 13.27 | 3.26 | 34.47 | 16.08 | 2.24 | 2.16 | 0.145 | −16.75 | 59.14 | ** |
| Ala | 6 | 4.98 | 0.57 | 20.02 | 7.06 | 3.68 | 2.03 | 0.065 | −2.35 | 32.42 | ** |
| GABA | 6 | 2.52 | 0.39 | 6.60 | 2.18 | 3.19 | 2.13 | 0.079 | −1.12 | 9.27 | |
| Pro | 6 | 46.65 | 16.35 | 143.67 | 16.41 | 7.26 | 4.00 | 0.002 | 59.89 | 134.14 | *** |
| Lys | 6 | 14.36 | 2.60 | 52.84 | 13.61 | 4.81 | 2.15 | 0.035 | 6.22 | 70.75 | *** |
| Val | 6 | 5.03 | 1.13 | 22.50 | 3.46 | 8.32 | 2.43 | 0.008 | 9.80 | 25.14 | ** |
| Ile | 6 | 1.82 | 0.17 | 11.44 | 2.41 | 6.91 | 2.02 | 0.020 | 3.68 | 15.57 | ** |
| Leu | 6 | 1.22 | 0.15 | 4.79 | 1.30 | 4.70 | 2.05 | 0.040 | 0.38 | 6.74 | *** |
| Phe | 6 | 2.68 | 0.21 | 15.18 | 5.26 | 4.11 | 2.01 | 0.054 | −0.54 | 25.54 | *** |
| Total aa | 6 | 9.27 | 0.66 | 27.68 | 6.38 | 4.97 | 2.04 | 0.037 | 2.79 | 34.04 | *** |
| Starch | 6 | 0.50 | 0.11 | 0.74 | 0.20 | 1.83 | 3.07 | 0.162 | −0.17 | 0.64 | |
| Glucose | 6 | 4.44 | 0.75 | 9.95 | 1.33 | 6.24 | 3.14 | 0.007 | 2.77 | 8.24 | *** |
| Fructose | 6 | 7.06 | 1.21 | 13.70 | 2.20 | 4.58 | 3.10 | 0.018 | 2.11 | 11.18 | *** |
| Sucrose | 6 | 8.52 | 0.76 | 12.42 | 0.86 | 5.88 | 3.95 | 0.004 | 2.05 | 5.75 | *** |
| N | 6 | 1.03 | 0.23 | 1.43 | 0.29 | 1.90 | 3.81 | 0.134 | −0.20 | 1.00 | |
| C | 6 | 0.84 | 0.02 | 0.92 | 0.05 | 2.64 | 2.73 | 0.086 | −0.02 | 0.17 | *** |
| C/N | 6 | 0.84 | 0.19 | 0.66 | 0.10 | −1.53 | 2.95 | 0.225 | −0.58 | 0.21 | |
Columns represent (from left to right): components; total number of samples analyzed (n); mean and standard deviation (SD) for Vandana and 481B, respectively (columns 3–6); Welch’s t value (t); degrees of freedom (df); p value; and the confidence interval at 95 % probability (CI.95). The values used for the calculation are the ratio of each component’s content in drought versus well-watered conditions, representing the genotypic response under drought. The last column represents the significance level obtained from the Tukey HSD test that compared Vandana, 481B, and Way Rarem (significance values are *, **, and *** representing 0.05, 0.01, and <0.001, respectively). Gray-shaded cells are components significant by Welch’s t test at p < 0.05. The comparison between the Welch’s t test and the Tukey HSD highlighted differences in the significance of some components
Results of Welch’s t test comparing the means of Vandana and 481-B for the 20 metabolites, total amino acids, carbohydrates, C, N, and C/N analyzed in spikelet tissue
| Component |
| MeanV | SDV | Mean481B | SD481B |
|
|
| CI.95 | Tukey HSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His | 6 | 2.71 | 1.05 | 1.88 | 0.48 | −1.25 | 2.79 | 0.304 | −3.04 | 1.37 | *** |
| Asn | 6 | 11.93 | 4.91 | 19.07 | 2.33 | 2.27 | 2.86 | 0.112 | −3.14 | 17.41 | |
| Ser | 6 | 1.65 | 0.35 | 1.98 | 0.96 | 0.55 | 2.52 | 0.630 | −1.78 | 2.43 | |
| Gln | 6 | 2.10 | 0.17 | 3.61 | 1.04 | 2.49 | 2.11 | 0.125 | −0.98 | 4.01 | |
| Gly | 6 | 5.09 | 1.99 | 6.31 | 1.07 | 0.94 | 3.06 | 0.416 | −2.88 | 5.33 | |
| Asp | 6 | 1.07 | 0.26 | 1.43 | 0.31 | 1.57 | 3.90 | 0.194 | −0.29 | 1.01 | |
| Glu | 6 | 0.98 | 0.22 | 1.71 | 0.30 | 3.43 | 3.66 | 0.031 | 0.12 | 1.34 | * |
| Thr | 6 | 1.21 | 0.28 | 1.99 | 0.44 | 2.60 | 3.42 | 0.070 | −0.11 | 1.67 | |
| Ala | 6 | 0.87 | 0.28 | 1.05 | 0.23 | 0.86 | 3.84 | 0.442 | −0.41 | 0.77 | |
| GABA | 6 | 4.40 | 2.62 | 2.72 | 0.22 | −1.10 | 2.03 | 0.383 | −8.11 | 4.76 | |
| Pro | 6 | 36.62 | 14.05 | 22.70 | 1.54 | −1.71 | 2.05 | 0.227 | −48.25 | 20.42 | |
| Lys | 6 | 3.12 | 1.17 | 2.52 | 0.96 | −0.69 | 3.85 | 0.532 | −3.07 | 1.87 | |
| Val | 6 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1.13 | 0.35 | 2.18 | 2.07 | 0.156 | −0.41 | 1.30 | |
| Ile | 6 | 0.61 | 0.03 | 1.26 | 0.19 | 5.69 | 2.07 | 0.027 | 0.17 | 1.12 | |
| Leu | 6 | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 2.92 | 0.750 | −0.55 | 0.68 | |
| Phe | 6 | 0.83 | 0.19 | 1.62 | 0.28 | 4.00 | 3.50 | 0.021 | 0.21 | 1.37 | |
| Total aa | 6 | 2.36 | 0.60 | 2.64 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 3.97 | 0.581 | −1.02 | 1.58 | |
| Starch | 6 | 1.87 | 1.03 | 0.97 | 0.12 | −1.49 | 2.05 | 0.271 | −3.42 | 1.63 | * |
| Glucose | 6 | 3.14 | 0.76 | 1.40 | 0.26 | −3.74 | 2.44 | 0.047 | −3.43 | −0.05 | *** |
| Fructose | 6 | 3.96 | 1.41 | 1.65 | 0.31 | −2.77 | 2.19 | 0.099 | −5.62 | 1.00 | *** |
| Sucrose | 6 | 0.89 | 0.14 | 1.32 | 0.27 | 2.46 | 2.99 | 0.091 | −0.13 | 0.97 | |
| N | 6 | 0.94 | 0.08 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 2.40 | 2.86 | 0.100 | −0.09 | 0.58 | |
| C | 6 | 1.06 | 0.01 | 1.09 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 2.04 | 0.495 | −0.11 | 0.16 | |
| C/N | 6 | 1.13 | 0.09 | 0.92 | 0.08 | −3.04 | 3.96 | 0.039 | −0.40 | −0.02 | |
Columns represent (from left to right): components; total number of samples analyzed (n); mean and standard deviation (SD) for Vandana and 481B, respectively (columns 3–6); Welch’s t value (t); degrees of freedom (df); p value; and the confidence interval at 95 % probability (CI.95). The values used for the calculation are the ratio of each component’s content in drought versus well-watered conditions, representing the genotypic response under drought. The last column represents the significance level obtained from the Tukey HSD test that compared Vandana, 481B, and Way Rarem (significance values are *, **, and *** representing 0.05, 0.01, and <0.001, respectively). Gray-shaded cells are components significant by Welch’s t test at p < 0.05. The comparison between the Welch’s t test and the Tukey HSD highlighted differences in the significance of some components
Fig. 5Principal component analysis (PCA) of different metabolites in a flag leaves, b roots, and c spikelets in their response to drought stress. A common set of 23 metabolites is represented for each genotype. Each data point represents the ratio of the metabolite content in drought conditions divided by the metabolite content in well-watered conditions in each genotype. Vandana is represented in orange, 481-B is in red, and Way Rarem is in green. The arrows represent the vectors for each metabolite, the direction varying toward the highest squared multiple correlation with the principal component