Timothée Jacquesson1,2, Emile Simon3, Moncef Berhouma4, Emmanuel Jouanneau4. 1. Skull Base Multi-disciplinary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery B, Neurological Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Bd Pinel, 69677, Lyon Cedex, France. timothee.jacquesson@neurochirurgie.fr. 2. Department of Anatomy, University of Lyon 1, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69003, Lyon, France. timothee.jacquesson@neurochirurgie.fr. 3. Department of Anatomy, University of Lyon 1, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69003, Lyon, France. 4. Skull Base Multi-disciplinary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery B, Neurological Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Bd Pinel, 69677, Lyon Cedex, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Since the petroclival region is deep-seated with close neurovascular relationships, the removal of petroclival tumors still represents a fascinating surgical challenge. Although the classical anterior petrosectomy (AP) offers a meaningful access to this petroclival region, the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) recently leads to overcome difficulties from trans-cranial approaches. Herein, we present an anatomic comparison of AP versus EEEA. We aim to describe the limits of these both approaches helping the choice of the optimal surgical route for petroclival tumors. METHODS: Six fresh cadaveric heads were harvested and injected with colored latex. Each approach was step-by-step detailed until its final surgical exposure. RESULTS: The AP provided a narrow direct supero-lateral access to the petroclival area that can also reach the cavernous sinus, the retrochiasmatic region and perimesencephalic cisterns. However, this corridor anterior to the internal acoustic meatus passed on each side of the trigeminal nerve. Moreover, tumor extensions toward the foramen jugularis, inside the clivus or behind the internal acoustic meatus were difficult to control. The EEEA brought a straightforward access to the clivus but the petrous apex was hidden behind the internal carotid artery. Several variants were described: a medial transclival, a lateral through the Meckel's cave and an inferior trans-pterygoid route. Elsewhere, tumor extension behind the internal acoustic meatus or above the tentorium could not be satisfactorily assessed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: PA and EEEA have their own limits in reaching the petroclival region in accordance with the tumor characteristics. The AP should be preferred for radical removal of middle-sized petrous apex intradural tumors like meningiomas. The EEEA would be of interest for extradural midline tumors like chordomas or for petrous apex cysts drainage.
PURPOSE: Since the petroclival region is deep-seated with close neurovascular relationships, the removal of petroclival tumors still represents a fascinating surgical challenge. Although the classical anterior petrosectomy (AP) offers a meaningful access to this petroclival region, the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) recently leads to overcome difficulties from trans-cranial approaches. Herein, we present an anatomic comparison of AP versus EEEA. We aim to describe the limits of these both approaches helping the choice of the optimal surgical route for petroclival tumors. METHODS: Six fresh cadaveric heads were harvested and injected with colored latex. Each approach was step-by-step detailed until its final surgical exposure. RESULTS: The AP provided a narrow direct supero-lateral access to the petroclival area that can also reach the cavernous sinus, the retrochiasmatic region and perimesencephalic cisterns. However, this corridor anterior to the internal acoustic meatus passed on each side of the trigeminal nerve. Moreover, tumor extensions toward the foramen jugularis, inside the clivus or behind the internal acoustic meatus were difficult to control. The EEEA brought a straightforward access to the clivus but the petrous apex was hidden behind the internal carotid artery. Several variants were described: a medial transclival, a lateral through the Meckel's cave and an inferior trans-pterygoid route. Elsewhere, tumor extension behind the internal acoustic meatus or above the tentorium could not be satisfactorily assessed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: PA and EEEA have their own limits in reaching the petroclival region in accordance with the tumor characteristics. The AP should be preferred for radical removal of middle-sized petrous apex intradural tumors like meningiomas. The EEEA would be of interest for extradural midline tumors like chordomas or for petrous apex cysts drainage.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endonasal; Endoscopy; Petroclival; Petrosectomy; Skull base
Authors: M A Horgan; G J Anderson; J X Kellogg; M S Schwartz; S Spektor; S O McMenomey; J B Delashaw Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Steve W Chang; Anhua Wu; Pankaj Gore; Elisa Beres; Randall W Porter; Mark C Preul; Robert F Spetzler; Nicholas C Bambakidis Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Matteo de Notaris; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Alberto Prats-Galino; Isabella Esposito; Arnau Benet; José Poblete; Vinicio Valente; Joan Berenguer Gonzalez; Enrique Ferrer; Paolo Cappabianca Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Rungsak Siwanuwatn; Pushpa Deshmukh; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo; Neil R Crawford; Robert F Spetzler; Mark C Preul Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Feng Xu; Ioannis Karampelas; Cliff A Megerian; Warren R Selman; Nicholas C Bambakidis Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Rafael Martínez-Pérez; Giuliano Silveira-Bertazzo; Gustavo G Rangel; Pablo Albiña; Douglas Hardesty; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: João Mangussi-Gomes; João T Alves-Belo; Huy Q Truong; Gustavo F Nogueira; Eric W Wang; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: Thanapong Loymak; Evgenii Belykh; Irakliy Abramov; Somkanya Tungsanga; Christina E Sarris; Andrew S Little; Mark C Preul Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2022-01-14
Authors: I S Muskens; S J H Diederen; J T Senders; A H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; W R van Furth; A M May; T R Smith; A L Bredenoord; M L D Broekman Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2017-08-06 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Ciro Mastantuoni; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Felice Esposito; Elena d'Avella; Oreste de Divitiis; Teresa Somma; Andrea Bocchino; Gianluca Lorenzo Fabozzi; Paolo Cappabianca; Domenico Solari Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: E Suero Molina; J M Revuelta Barbero; C Ewelt; W Stummer; R L Carrau; D M Prevedello Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.042