Literature DB >> 36097500

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Exposure among Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to Petrosectomy: An Experimental Study in Cadavers.

Thanapong Loymak1, Evgenii Belykh1, Irakliy Abramov1, Somkanya Tungsanga2, Christina E Sarris1, Andrew S Little1, Mark C Preul1.   

Abstract

Objectives  Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for petrosectomies are evolving to reduce perioperative brain injuries and complications. Surgical terminology, techniques, landmarks, advantages, and limitations of these approaches remain ill defined. We quantitatively analyzed the anatomical relationships and differences between EEA exposures for medial, inferior, and inferomedial petrosectomies. Design  This study presents anatomical dissection and quantitative analysis. Setting  Cadaveric heads were used for dissection. EEAs were performed using the medial petrosectomy (MP), the inferior petrosectomy (IP), and the inferomedial petrosectomy (IMP) techniques. Participants  Six cadaver heads (12 sides, total) were dissected; each technique was performed on four sides. Main Outcomes and Measures  Outcomes included the area of exposure, visible distances, angles of attack, and bone resection volume. Results  The IMP technique provided a greater area of exposure ( p  < 0.01) and bone resection volume ( p  < 0.01) when compared with the MP and IP techniques. The IMP technique had a longer working length of the abducens nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VI) than the MP technique ( p  < 0.01). The IMP technique demonstrated higher angles of attack to specific neurovascular structures when compared with the MP (midpons [ p  = 0.04], anterior inferior cerebellar artery [ p  < 0.01], proximal part of the cisternal CN VI segment [ p  = 0.02]) and IP (flocculus [ p  = 0.02] and the proximal [ p  = 0.02] and distal parts [ p  = 0.02] of the CN VII/VIII complex) techniques. Conclusion  Each of these approaches offers varying degrees of access to the petroclival region, and the surgical approach should be appropriately tailored to the pathology. Overall, the IMP technique provides greater EEA surgical exposure to vital neurovascular structures than the MP and the IP techniques. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic endonasal approach; petroclival; petrosectomy; transpterygoid

Year:  2022        PMID: 36097500      PMCID: PMC9462962          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  30 in total

1.  The palatovaginal canal: can it be identified on routine CT and MR imaging?

Authors:  Zoran Rumboldt; Mauricio Castillo; Jeffrey K Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver Y Chin; Ritam Ghosh; Christina H Fang; Soly Baredes; James K Liu; Jean Anderson Eloy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region.

Authors:  Jun Muto; Daniel M Prevedello; Leo F S Ditzel Filho; Ing Ping Tang; Kenichi Oyama; Edward E Kerr; Bradley A Otto; Takeshi Kawase; Kazunari Yoshida; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Endoscopic study for the pterygopalatine fossa anatomy: via the middle nasal meatus-sphenopalatine foramen approach.

Authors:  Jiping Li; Xiongwei Xu; Jiadong Wang; Xiaojie Jing; Qinhua Guo; Yongming Qiu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Endoscopic identification of the pharyngeal (palatovaginal) canal: an overlooked area.

Authors:  Islam R Herzallah; Sameh Amin; Mona A El-Hariri; Roy R Casiano
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-10

6.  Endoscopic Endonasal Petrosectomy: Anatomical Investigation, Limitations, and Surgical Relevance.

Authors:  Hamid Borghei-Razavi; Huy Q Truong; David T Fernandes Cabral; Xicai Sun; Emrah Celtikci; Eric Wang; Carl Snyderman; Paul A Gardner; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Inframeatal Area: Anatomic Nuances with Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Revuelta Barbero; Raywat Noiphithak; Juan C Yanez-Siller; Somasundaram Subramaniam; Mariana Sousa Calha; Bradley A Otto; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Extended endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to the ventrolateral brainstem and related cisternal spaces: anatomical study.

Authors:  Elena d'Avella; Flavio Angileri; Matteo de Notaris; Joaquin Enseñat; Vita Stagno; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Joan Berenguer Gonzales; Alessandro Weiss; Alberto Prats-Galino
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Traumatic Vidian Nerve Injury: An Underrecognized Complication in Basisphenoid Fractures.

Authors:  Jeremy Chee; Chew Lip Ng
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

10.  Quantitative Endoscopic Comparison of Contralateral Interhemispheric Transprecuneus and Supracerebellar Transtentorial Transcollateral Sulcus Approaches to the Atrium.

Authors:  Xiaochun Zhao; Leandro Borba Moreira; Claudio Cavallo; Evgenii Belykh; Sirin Gandhi; Mohamed A Labib; Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Celene B Mulholland; Brandon D Liebelt; Michaela Lee; Peter Nakaji; Mark C Preul
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.