Literature DB >> 26067190

A novel zernike application to differentiate between three-dimensional corneal thickness of normal corneas and corneas with keratoconus.

Rohit Shetty1, Himanshu Matalia1, Purnima Srivatsa1, Arkasubhra Ghosh2, William J Dupps3, Abhijit Sinha Roy4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel Zernike algorithm to differentiate 3-dimensional (3-D) corneal thickness distribution of corneas with keratoconus (KC) from normal corneas.
DESIGN: A retrospective development and evaluation of a diagnostic approach.
METHODS: Corneal tomography with Scheimpflug imaging was performed in normal (43 eyes) and KC (85 eyes) corneas. Axial and tangential cone location magnitude index (axial CLMI and tangential CLMI, respectively) of the anterior and posterior surface were calculated. The aberrations of the anterior corneal surface were analyzed with Zernike polynomials. Pachymetric Zernike analyses (PZA) were used to map the 3-D thickness distribution of the cornea. Logistic regression was performed to develop a diagnostic procedure for KC using CLMI, PZA, and aberrations. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed for each regression model. Corneal volume was also compared between normal and KC corneas. Only the central 5 mm zone was used for all analyses.
RESULTS: Among the PZA coefficients, second- and third-order root mean squares of PZA coefficients were the best predictors of KC corneas (P < .0001). Among the CLMI variables, axial CLMI of anterior and tangential CLMI of posterior surface were the best predictors of KC (P < .0001). Among the Zernike corneal aberration coefficients, second- and third-order root mean squares of coefficients were the best predictors of KC (P < .0001). Sensitivity and specificity of Zernike corneal aberrations, CLMI, and PZA logistic regression model were similar (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The entire 3-D corneal thickness was mapped with Zernike. The PZA method was comparable to CLMI and anterior corneal wavefront aberrations in detecting KC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26067190      PMCID: PMC6084477          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  22 in total

1.  Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ruiz Simonato Alonso; Allan Luz; Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ana Laura C Caiado; Frederico P Guerra; Ricardo Louzada; Roy A Sinha; Allan Luz; William J Dupps; Michael W Belin
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus.

Authors:  Alain Saad; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Raksha Urs; Arindam Roychoudhury; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Dan Z Reinstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Keratoconus: spatial variation of corneal thickenss as a diagnostic test.

Authors:  R B Mandell; K A Polse
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-08

6.  Cone location-dependent outcomes after combined topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and collagen cross-linking.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Maneck Nicholson; Koushik Sargod; Chaitra Jayadev; Himabindu Veluri; Abhijit Sinha Roy
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Marine Gobbe; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus.

Authors:  Katie M Hallahan; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Renato Ambrosio; Marcella Salomao; William J Dupps
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments.

Authors:  Cynthia J Roberts; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Goodness-of-prediction of Zernike polynomial fitting to corneal surfaces.

Authors:  Michael K Smolek; Stephen D Klyce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of cone size and centre in keratoconic corneas.

Authors:  Ashkan Eliasy; Ahmed Abass; Bernardo T Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Haixia Zhang; Paolo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Cynthia J Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Winston Chamberlain; Ou Tan; Robert Brass; Jack L Weiss; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Weibo Li; Jun Jiang; Xiran Zhuang; Wei Chen; Mei Peng; Jianhua Wang; Fan Lu; Meixiao Shen; Yuanyuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Morphogeometric analysis for characterization of keratoconus considering the spatial localization and projection of apex and minimum corneal thickness point.

Authors:  Jose S Velázquez; Francisco Cavas; David P Piñero; Francisco J F Cañavate; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 5.  Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Cao; Karin Verspoor; Srujana Sahebjada; Paul N Baird
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.