Literature DB >> 26066208

Extortion under uncertainty: Zero-determinant strategies in noisy games.

Dong Hao1, Zhihai Rong1, Tao Zhou1,2.   

Abstract

Repeated game theory has been one of the most prevailing tools for understanding long-running relationships, which are the foundation in building human society. Recent works have revealed a new set of "zero-determinant" (ZD) strategies, which is an important advance in repeated games. A ZD strategy player can exert unilateral control on two players' payoffs. In particular, he can deterministically set the opponent's payoff or enforce an unfair linear relationship between the players' payoffs, thereby always seizing an advantageous share of payoffs. One of the limitations of the original ZD strategy, however, is that it does not capture the notion of robustness when the game is subjected to stochastic errors. In this paper, we propose a general model of ZD strategies for noisy repeated games and find that ZD strategies have high robustness against errors. We further derive the pinning strategy under noise, by which the ZD strategy player coercively sets the opponent's expected payoff to his desired level, although his payoff control ability declines with the increase of noise strength. Due to the uncertainty caused by noise, the ZD strategy player cannot ensure his payoff to be permanently higher than the opponent's, which implies dominant extortions do not exist even under low noise. While we show that the ZD strategy player can still establish a novel kind of extortions, named contingent extortions, where any increase of his own payoff always exceeds that of the opponent's by a fixed percentage, and the conditions under which the contingent extortions can be realized are more stringent as the noise becomes stronger.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26066208     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  11 in total

1.  Synergistic third-party rewarding and punishment in the public goods game.

Authors:  Yinhai Fang; Tina P Benko; Matjaž Perc; Haiyan Xu; Qingmei Tan
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Direct reciprocity between individuals that use different strategy spaces.

Authors:  Laura Schmid; Christian Hilbe; Krishnendu Chatterjee; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Memory-two zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.

Authors:  Masahiko Ueda
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Zero-Determinant Strategies in Iterated Public Goods Game.

Authors:  Liming Pan; Dong Hao; Zhihai Rong; Tao Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Unfavorable Individuals in Social Gaming Networks.

Authors:  Yichao Zhang; Guanrong Chen; Jihong Guan; Zhongzhi Zhang; Shuigeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Asymmetric Power Boosts Extortion in an Economic Experiment.

Authors:  Christian Hilbe; Kristin Hagel; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Divide-and-conquer Tournament on Social Networks.

Authors:  Jiasheng Wang; Yichao Zhang; Jihong Guan; Shuigeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Extortion can outperform generosity in the iterated prisoner's dilemma.

Authors:  Zhijian Wang; Yanran Zhou; Jaimie W Lien; Jie Zheng; Bin Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Linear algebraic structure of zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.

Authors:  Masahiko Ueda; Toshiyuki Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Misperception influence on zero-determinant strategies in iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Cheng; Guanpu Chen; Yiguang Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.