| Literature DB >> 26064909 |
Jing-Miao Yu1, Qing-Hua Luo2, Jin-Lu Sun1, Cun-Lian Shi2, Jia Yin1, Yu-Ling Zhou2, Rui Tang1, Hui Zhang2, Zhang Yu2, Meng Chen2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To survey the species diversity of home dust mites (HDM) in Xishuangbanna, a tropical rainforest region in Southwest China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064909 PMCID: PMC4434167 DOI: 10.1155/2015/421716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Composition of mites and insects in house dust in Xishuangbanna area.
| Species | Sampled homesa,b ( | Samplesb ( | Mitesc ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| Acari | 40 | 97.56 | 186 | 79.83 | 6316 | 99.48 |
| Astigmata | 40 | 97.56 | 183 | 78.54 | 6157 | 96.98 |
| Pyroglyphidae | 40 | 97.56 | 182 | 78.11 | 6102 | 96.11 |
|
| 40 | 97.56 | 167 | 71.67 | 4001 | 63.02 |
|
| 38 | 92.68 | 126 | 54.08 | 1128 | 17.77 |
|
| 20 | 48.78 | 39 | 16.74 | 101 | 1.59 |
| Nymph | 38 | 92.68 | 126 | 54.08 | 818 | 12.88 |
| Larva | 19 | 46.34 | 27 | 11.59 | 54 | 0.85 |
| Acaridae | 14 | 34.15 | 19 | 8.15 | 34 | 0.54 |
|
| 10 | 24.39 | 16 | 6.87 | 28 | 0.44 |
|
| 3 | 7.32 | 3 | 1.29 | 6 | 0.09 |
| Glycyphagidae | 13 | 31.71 | 16 | 6.87 | 19 | 0.30 |
|
| 10 | 24.39 | 16 | 6.87 | 19 | 0.30 |
| Histiostomatidae | 2 | 4.88 | 2 | 0.86 | 2 | 0.03 |
| Oribatida | 5 | 12.20 | 8 | 3.43 | 26 | 0.41 |
| Haplochthoniidae | 5 | 12.20 | 8 | 3.43 | 25 | 0.39 |
| Unidentified | 1 | 2.44 | 1 | 0.43 | 1 | 0.02 |
| Prostigmata | 27 | 65.85 | 54 | 23.18 | 123 | 1.94 |
| Cheyletidae | 27 | 65.85 | 54 | 23.18 | 123 | 1.94 |
| Mesostigmata | 5 | 12.20 | 8 | 3.43 | 10 | 0.16 |
| Blattisociidae | 3 | 7.32 | 6 | 2.58 | 8 | 0.13 |
| Laelapidae Berlese | 2 | 4.88 | 2 | 0.86 | 2 | 0.03 |
|
| ||||||
| Insecta | 10 | 24.39 | 12 | 5.15 | 33 | 0.52 |
| Liposcelididae | 6 | 14.63 | 6 | 2.58 | 22 | 0.35 |
| Unidentified | 6 | 14.63 | 7 | 3.00 | 11 | 0.17 |
|
| ||||||
| Total number identified | 40 | 97.56 | 186 | 79.83 | 6349 | |
| Total number collected | 41 | 233 | ||||
aHomes with more than one sample were regarded as the same home. bThe percentages of homes and samples were calculated with total number collected as the denominator. cThe percentage of individual specimens was calculated with total number identified as the denominator.
Figure 1Comparisons across the seasons of total mite (a), D. farinae (b), D. pteronyssinus (c), and D. siboney (d) densities at 18 sites.
Comparisons of the mite density in case homes versus control homes.
| Group (number of samples) | Mite density, number of samples (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowa | Mediumb | Highc | |
| Case ( | 110 (57.3%) | 59 (30.7%) | 23 (12.0%) |
| Control ( | 21 (51.2%) | 12 (29.3%) | 8 (19.5%) |
a≤100 mites/g dust. b100–500 mites/g dust. c>500 mites/g dust.
Note: the value of row mean score differ test was 1.2184 and the P value was 0.2697, which indicated that there were no differences in the mite densities between case and control homes.