| Literature DB >> 26064586 |
Simon M Tierney1, Steven J B Cooper2, Kathleen M Saint3, Terry Bertozzi2, Josephine Hyde1, William F Humphreys4, Andrew D Austin1.
Abstract
The regressive evolution of eyes has long intrigued biologists yet the genetic underpinnings remain opaque. A system of discrete aquifers in arid Australia provides a powerful comparative means to explore trait regression at the genomic level. Multiple surface ancestors from two tribes of diving beetles (Dytiscidae) repeatedly invaded these calcrete aquifers and convergently evolved eye-less phenotypes. We use this system to assess transcription of opsin photoreceptor genes among the transcriptomes of two surface and three subterranean dytiscid species and test whether these genes have evolved under neutral predictions. Transcripts for UV, long-wavelength and ciliary-type opsins were identified from the surface beetle transcriptomes. Two subterranean beetles showed parallel loss of all opsin transcription, as expected under 'neutral' regressive evolution. The third species Limbodessus palmulaoides retained transcription of a long-wavelength opsin (lwop) orthologue, albeit in an aphotic environment. Tests of selection on lwop indicated no significant differences between transcripts derived from surface and subterranean habitats, with strong evidence for purifying selection acting on L. palmulaoides lwop. Retention of sequence integrity and the lack of evidence for neutral evolution raise the question of whether we have identified a novel pleiotropic role for lwop, or an incipient phase of pseudogene development.Entities:
Keywords: Bidessini; Hydroporini; opsin; pleiotropy; pseudogene; regressive evolution
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064586 PMCID: PMC4448788 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Dytiscid beetle orthologous matches to Candidate Set opsin genes. Qualitative representation of positive matches from the five targeted dytiscid beetle transcriptomes, which corresponds to BLAST search results detailed in the electronic supplementary material, table S1—Candidate Set gene numbers (1–16) and dytiscid beetle species designations (a–e). Positive matches (greater than or equal to 50% query coverage and greater than or equal to 70% identity) are defined as: match to target accession (black bar); match to other insect orthologue (grey bar); or no evidence for an orthologous match (white bar). Proteins exclusively expressed by both surface species, but absent from all subterranean species are identified by an open circle.
Dytiscid opsin sequence coverage depth. Mean sequence coverage depth per nucleotide base (±s.e.) for transcripts of dytiscid beetle opsin orthologues. The maximum depth for a single nucleotide base within each transcript is presented in square brackets and the sample size (n) represents the full length of the unedited transcript (number of bases). The subterranean species is shaded grey.
Figure 2.Relative sequence coverage depth for identified opsin orthologues. Mean sequence coverage depth is plotted on a lognormal scale. The relative coverage is indicated for each of the seven indentified opsin orthologues for surface (A. bistrigatus, circle; P. niogroadumbratus, triangle) and subterranean (L. palmulaoides, square) species. Opsin copy is identified by colour: ciliary-type (brown), UV (violet) and long wavelength (green).
Figure 3.Opsin phylogeny. Majority rule consensus tree of visual and non-visual opsin photoreceptors derived from Bayesian inference, with posterior probability node support. Tree branches and terminal taxa are colour coded to identify Candidate Set opsin gene class from figure 1: ciliary (brown), UV (violet), blue (blue), long wavelength (green) and outgroups (dark grey).
Pairwise assessment of dytiscid beetle long-wavelength opsin. P-distances calculated using amino acid (aa) and nucleotide (nuc) alignments. Hypothesis-based assessment (Z-tests) of neutral evolution as the null state (H0), whereby non-synonymous substitutions are equal to synonymous substitutions (dN=dS), tested against the following alternative hypotheses (Ha):Ha 1—non-neutral evolution dN≠dS; Ha 2—purifying selection dN