| Literature DB >> 26064166 |
Baohui Jia1, Zhishun Liu2, Baoquan Min3, Zhenchang Wang4, Aihong Zhou3, Yong Li4, Haifa Qiao5, Jianping Jia3.
Abstract
Accumulating neuroimaging studies in humans have shown that acupuncture can modulate a widely distributed brain network in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Acupuncture at different acupoints could exert different modulatory effects on the brain network. However, whether acupuncture at real or sham acupoints can produce different effects on the brain network in MCI or AD patients remains unclear. Using resting-state fMRI, we reported that acupuncture at Taixi (KI3) induced amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) change of different brain regions in MCI patients from those shown in the healthy controls. In MCI patients, acupuncture at KI3 increased or decreased ALFF in the different regions from those activated by acupuncture in the healthy controls. Acupuncture at the sham acupoint in MCI patients activated the different brain regions from those in healthy controls. Therefore, we concluded that acupuncture displays more significant effect on neuronal activities of the above brain regions in MCI patients than that in healthy controls. Acupuncture at KI3 exhibits different effects on the neuronal activities of the brain regions from acupuncture at sham acupoint, although the difference is only shown at several regions due to the close distance between the above points.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064166 PMCID: PMC4433670 DOI: 10.1155/2015/529675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Characteristics of the MCI patients and normal controls.
| Characteristics | MCI | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (years) | 74.1 ± 7.8 | 70.2 ± 7.1 | 0.571 |
| Education (years) | 12.5 ± 3.1 | 11.4 ± 4.2 | 0.787 |
| MMSE | 27.0 ± 2.3 | 29.2 ± 1.3 |
|
| ADAS-cog | 6.7 ± 2.9 | 2.5 ± 1.7 |
|
MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination (max = 30); ADAS: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale.
Figure 1Mean ALFF maps in normal controls and MCI patients in the resting state. Color bar represents t value which increases with the darker color. The number under the color bar is the range of t value.
Figure 2Unpaired t-test shows statistical difference map of ALFF between MCI patients and normal controls in the resting state.
The brain areas that show significant difference in ALFF compared with the MCI patients with normal controls in the resting state.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3672 | Medial frontal gyrus | BA6 | L | 4.5 | 22.5 | 68.5 | −6.144 | 5.0 × 10−4 |
| 1539 | Inferior temporal gyrus | R | −58.5 | 13.5 | −21.5 | 5.1157 | 2.6 × 10−4 | |
| 1242 | Posterior cingulate | R | −22.5 | 58.5 | 20.5 | 5.0297 | 2.9 × 10−4 |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.
Figure 3Mean ALFF maps in the resting state combined with acupuncture at real or sham acupoint in normal controls and MCI patients. (a) Mean ALFF maps within normal controls and MCI patients in the resting state combined with acupuncture at KI3. (b) Mean ALFF maps within normal controls and MCI patients in the resting state combined with acupuncture at sham acupoint.
Figure 4Unpaired t-test exhibits statistical difference map of ALFF between MCI patients and normal controls in resting state combined with acupuncture at KI3.
The brain areas that show significant difference in ALFF in MCI patients compared with normal controls in the resting state combined with acupuncture at KI3.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1107 | Culmen | R | 10.5 | −40.5 | −12.5 | 4.3581 | 9.3 × 10−4 | |
| 972 | Medial frontal gyrus | 10 | R | 10.5 | 37.5 | −12.5 | 4.0723 | 1.6 × 10−3 |
| 918 | Paracentral lobule | L | −4.5 | −22.5 | 77.5 | −5.436 | 1.5 × 10−4 | |
| 891 | Cerebellar tonsil Culmen | R | 19.5 | −34.5 | −27.5 | 6.7392 | 2.1 × 10−5 | |
| 675 | Cuneus | 23 | L | −13.5 | −73.5 | 8.5 | 4.7565 | 4.7 × 10−4 |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.
Figure 5Unpaired t-test shows significant difference map of ALFF between MCI patients and normal controls in resting state combined with acupuncture at sham acupoint.
The brain areas that show significant difference in ALFF in MCI patients compared with normal controls in the resting state combined with acupuncture at sham acupoint.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1053 | Medial frontal gyrus | 6 | L | −4.5 | −25.5 | 74.5 | −4.1004 | 1.5 × 10−3 |
| 972 | Superior frontal gyrus | 6 | R | 1.5 | −4.5 | 68.5 | −4.1896 | 1.3 × 10−3 |
| Medial frontal gyrus |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.
Figure 6Two-sample paired t-test shows statistical difference map of ALFF in MCI patients between acupuncture at KI3 and no acupuncture in the resting state.
The brain areas of ALFF signal change significantly in MCI patients with acupuncture at KI3 compared with no acupuncture in the resting state.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1134 | Parahippocampal gyrus | 28 | L | −13.5 | −13.5 | −9.5 | 5.644 | 1.3 × 10−3 |
| 972 | Middle frontal gyrus | R | 28.5 | 7.5 | 32.5 | 6.9909 | 4.2 × 10−4 | |
| 891 | Cingulate gyrus | L | −25.5 | 1.5 | 29.5 | 7.117 | 3.9 × 10−4 | |
| 702 | Cingulate gyrus | 6 | L | −25.5 | −10.5 | 38.5 | 7.0511 | 4.1 × 10−4 |
| Middle frontal gyrus | ||||||||
| 621 | Subthalamic nucleus (thalamus) | R | 10.5 | −16.5 | −3.5 | 9.6493 | 7.1 × 10−5 |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.
Figure 7Two-sample paired t-test displays statistical difference map of ALFF in MCI patients between acupuncture at sham point and no acupuncture in the resting state.
The brain areas of ALFF signal change significantly in MCI patients with acupuncture at sham acupoint compared with no acupuncture in the resting state.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 864 | Superior temporal gyrus | 41 | R | 49.5 | −31.5 | 11.5 | −6.4773 | 6.5 × 10−4 |
| 864 | Precentral gyrus | 6 | L | −46.5 | −7.5 | 32.5 | 10.425 | 4.4 × 10−5 |
| 648 | Medial frontal gyrus | R | 13.5 | 34.5 | 35.5 | 12.005 | 2.0 × 10−5 | |
| 594 | Medial frontal gyrus | 6 | L | −10.5 | −19.5 | 53.5 | 6.0288 | 9.5 × 10−4 |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.
Figure 8Two-sample paired t-test exhibits statistical difference map of ALFF in MCI patients between acupuncture at KI3 acupuncture and acupuncture at sham acupoint in the resting state.
The brain areas of ALFF signal change significantly in MCI patients with acupuncture at KI3 compared with acupuncture at sham acupoint in the resting state.
| Volume | Anatomical area | BA | H |
|
|
| Peak | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1593 | Middle frontal gyrus | 46 | L | −43.5 | 19.5 | 20.5 | −6.3792 | 7.0 × 10−4 |
| 864 | Superior temporal gyrus | 22 | R | 55.5 | −28.5 | 5.5 | 15.064 | 5.4 × 10−6 |
| 594 | Cingulate gyrus | 31 | R | 7.5 | −43.5 | 38.5 | 8.1928 | 1.8 × 10−4 |
BA: Brodmann area; H: hemisphere; x: x-axis; y: y-axis; z: z-axis; L: left; and R: right.