| Literature DB >> 26062748 |
Massimiliano Zampini1, Pauline Rees Stevens1, Justin A Pachebat1, Alison Kingston-Smith1, Luis A J Mur1, Finbarr Hayes2.
Abstract
The ability to assemble DNA sequences de novo through efficient and powerful DNA fabrication methods is one of the foundational technologies of synthetic biology. Gene synthesis, in particular, has been considered the main driver for the emergence of this new scientific discipline. Here we describe RapGene, a rapid gene assembly technique which was successfully tested for the synthesis and cloning of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes through a ligation independent approach. The method developed in this study is a complete bacterial gene synthesis platform for the quick, accurate and cost effective fabrication and cloning of gene-length sequences that employ the widely used host Escherichia coli.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26062748 PMCID: PMC4462754 DOI: 10.1038/srep11302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1RapGene overview.
(a) Plasmid pRG1.0 is digested simultaneously with AflII and NheI in the presence of T4 DNA polymerase and dTTPs to generate long 3’-recessed cohesive ends to accommodate the annealed oligonucleotides. (b) Oligonucleotides for each gene assembly are pooled in a buffered solution and then subjected to slow annealing (96 °C to 30 °C) for up to two hours. (c) Vector and pre-annealed oligonucleotides are further incubated from 45 °C to 30 °C in a 10 μl reaction. This mix is used to transform E. coli. Transformations are plated on LB supplemented with ampicillin and IPTG.
Cloning efficiency and sequence accuracy yields for the assembly of gfp (full length only) and aadA1 (full length and subfragments) in pRG1.0.
| Number of oligonucleotides in the assembly | Length of the assembly | Oligonucleotide lengths | Average overlaps within complementary pairs/ between consecutive pairs | CFU/μg LIC-treated pRG1.0 (mean ± s.d.) | Number of samples screened by colony PCR | Number of samples with correct-size insert | % of samples with correct-size insert | Number of samples sequenced | Number of samples with correct sequence | % of samples with correct sequence | Average CFU/plate normalized to 1 ml SOC overgrown culture (mean ± s.d.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 197 nt | 57–60 nt | 40/20 nt | >1.6 × 105 | 30 | 29 | 97% | 10 | 9 | 90% | >8000 | |
| 12 | 371 nt | 57–60 nt | 40/20 nt | 3.2 ± 6 × 103 | 30 | 28 | 93% | 10 | 7 | 70% | 175 ± 15 | |
| 18 | 545 nt | 57–60 nt | 40/20 nt | 1.4 ± 2 × 103 | 30 | 21 | 73% | 10 | 3 | 30% | 75 ± 5 | |
| 24 | 719 nt | 57–60 nt | 40/20 nt | 4.6 ± 1 × 102 | 40 | 2 | 5% | 2 | 2 | 100% | 23 ± 5 | |
| 28 | 836 nt | 57–60 nt | 40/20 nt | 5 ± 1 × 102 | 80 | 7 | 11% | 7 | 4 | 57% | 25 ± 5 | |
| 22 | 761 nt | 33/33 nt | 4.8 ± 1 × 102 | 70 | 14 | 20% | 14 | 9 | 64% | 24 ± 5 | ||
Figure 2Gel electrophoresis of PCR products derived from amplification of the pRG1.0 region containing synthetic aad1 or gfp inserts. (a) aad1 six oligonucleotide assembly. (b) aad1 12 oligonucleotide assembly. (c) aad1 18 oligonucleotide assembly. (d) aad1 24 oligonucleotide assembly. (e) aad1 28 oligonucleotide assembly. (f) gfp 22 oligonucleotide assembly. M is a 1 kb ladder (Promega). Arrows indicate the expected positions of PCR products which were 401 (a), 575 (b), 749 (c), 923 (d), 1040 (e) and 965 (f) bp. Underlined numbers in each lane represent samples with the correct sized inserts that were also sequence verified. Lanes labelled – are negative controls.
Figure 3Effect of the positive selection marker on RapGene cloning.
pRG1.0 was digested for two hours at 37 °C with AflII and NheI in the presence of T4 DNA polymerase and 1 mM dTTPs. After purification the prepared vector, with no insert, was transformed in E. coli NEB5α, SOC was added and cells were incubated for one hour at 37 °C, then one-fifth of the transformation was plated on LB supplemented with ampicillin plus IPTG (a) or ampicillin only (b). (c) Restriction profile of pRG1.0 used for this cloning. Lanes: 1, 1 kb ladder (Promega); 2, pRG1.0 undigested; 3, pRG1.0 digested with AflII, NheI and treated with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dTTPs.
Gene synthesis error rates and sources determined for RapGene. Data in the last four columns allow for a direct comparison with Gibson’s method23.
| 6 | 1970 | 1 | 0.050 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 | 3719 | 3 | 0.080 | 1,1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 18 | 5446 | 20 | 0.367 | 2,4,5 | 1,1,2,3 | 1,1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
| 24 | 1438 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 28 | 5016 | 2 | 0.039 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 22 | 9879 | 20 | 0.202 | 1,3,3,10 | 1,1,1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| Tot: | Tot: | Tot:31 | Tot:12 | Tot:3 | |||||||
| Final error rate:0.167 [(46/27468) x 100] | 67.39% (31/46) | 26.08% (12/46) | 6.52% (3/46) |