M Maier1, S Abraham2, C Frank2, N Feucht2, C P Lohmann2. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. Mathias.Maier@mri.tum.de. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the resolution rate in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (≤ 1500 μm) with or without macular holes (≤ 400 μm) after therapy with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) injection in a clinical setting. METHODS: Until now we have prospectively examined 21 eyes of 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes who underwent intravitreal operative injection of 0.1 ml ocriplasmin. The best corrected visual acuity and high-resolution optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) ultrastructural parameters were measured before injection and again 1, 3 and 4 months after treatment. The numbers of resolved vitreomacular traction and closed macular holes were documented. RESULTS: Vitreomacular traction was resolved in 15 out of 21 (71 %) eyes. Of the five eyes which initially presented with vitreomacular traction with macular holes, all showed resolution of vitreomacular traction but only two of the macular holes were closed. The average best corrected visual acuity was 0.38 logMAR (± 0.23) at baseline and 0.43 logMAR (± 0.28), 0.38 logMAR (± 0.27) and 0.36 logMAR (± 0.24) 1, 3 and 4 months after injection, respectively. The average foveal thickness was 355.95 μm (± 114.53 μm) at baseline, reducing to 304.61 μm (± 100.91 μm), 308.00 μm (±76.17 μm) and 277.50 μm (± 26.24 μm) after 1, 3 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this ongoing study there was a high percentage of resolution of vitreomacular traction (71 %) 1 month after intravitreal operative injection of Jetrea® and closure of two out of five macular holes. This was further associated with stabilization of visual acuity and reduction of foveal thickness. Further investigations are necessary to document the effectiveness of the pharmacological vitreolysis in a clinical setting.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the resolution rate in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (≤ 1500 μm) with or without macular holes (≤ 400 μm) after therapy with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) injection in a clinical setting. METHODS: Until now we have prospectively examined 21 eyes of 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes who underwent intravitreal operative injection of 0.1 ml ocriplasmin. The best corrected visual acuity and high-resolution optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) ultrastructural parameters were measured before injection and again 1, 3 and 4 months after treatment. The numbers of resolved vitreomacular traction and closed macular holes were documented. RESULTS: Vitreomacular traction was resolved in 15 out of 21 (71 %) eyes. Of the five eyes which initially presented with vitreomacular traction with macular holes, all showed resolution of vitreomacular traction but only two of the macular holes were closed. The average best corrected visual acuity was 0.38 logMAR (± 0.23) at baseline and 0.43 logMAR (± 0.28), 0.38 logMAR (± 0.27) and 0.36 logMAR (± 0.24) 1, 3 and 4 months after injection, respectively. The average foveal thickness was 355.95 μm (± 114.53 μm) at baseline, reducing to 304.61 μm (± 100.91 μm), 308.00 μm (±76.17 μm) and 277.50 μm (± 26.24 μm) after 1, 3 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this ongoing study there was a high percentage of resolution of vitreomacular traction (71 %) 1 month after intravitreal operative injection of Jetrea® and closure of two out of five macular holes. This was further associated with stabilization of visual acuity and reduction of foveal thickness. Further investigations are necessary to document the effectiveness of the pharmacological vitreolysis in a clinical setting.
Authors: Hideki Koizumi; Richard F Spaide; Yale L Fisher; K Bailey Freund; James M Klancnik; Lawrence A Yannuzzi Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: K-U Bartz-Schmidt; B Bertram; N Bornfeld; M Bresgen; N Eter; N Feltgen; W Friedrichs; H Heimann; H Helbig; H Hoerauf; F G Holz; A Kampik; K Lemmen; A Lommatzsch; D Pauleikhoff; J Roider Journal: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 0.700
Authors: A P Lommatzsch; M Gutfleisch; M Dietzel; B Heimes; G Spital; M Böhme; N Bornfeld; D Pauleikhoff Journal: Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 0.700
Authors: Francisco R Stefanini; Maurício Maia; Paulo Falabella; Marcel Pfister; Moritz Niemeyer; Amir H Kashani; Mark S Humayun; Michael J Koss Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2014-05-06
Authors: Thomas Bertelmann; Joachim Wachtlin; Stefan Mennel; Michael J Koss; Mathias M Maier; Ricarda G Schumann; Sara Kazerounian; Hanna Daniel; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Thomas Bertelmann; Lars Berndzen; Thomas Raber; Sebastian Pfeiffer; Andreas Leha; Christoph Paul; Nicolas Feltgen; Sebastian Bemme Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Edward William James Pritchard; Shams-Ulislam Ilyas; Soha Khaled Amar; Yit Chuin Yang; Nirodhini Narendran Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2016-01-12