Denise Thomson1, Kelly Russell2, Lorne Becker3, Terry Klassen4, Lisa Hartling2. 1. Cochrane Child Health Field, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. dthomson@ualberta.ca. 2. Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 3. Cochrane Comparing Multiple Interventions Methods Group and Department of Family Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, U.S.A. 4. Manitoba Institute of Child Health and Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, the Cochrane Child Health Field has published 18 overviews of reviews in our journal, Evidence-based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. In this article, we highlight some of the logistical and methodological challenges of producing such syntheses. As this is a new and evolving publication type, we hope that our experience will benefit others who engage in this process. Current Methods: We discuss the process we have developed to produce overviews of reviews relevant to our mandate, including identification of the research question, establishment of the author team, selection of outcomes and included SRs, and presentation of findings. Ongoing Development: We discuss the lessons we have learned, outstanding challenges for overview authors, and the limitations of overviews. CONCLUSIONS: Overviews of reviews are only as good as the SRs and primary studies on which they are based; gaps or lack of currency in this evidence will weaken the overview of reviews. Future directions in this work must address questions of bias and loss of information. Methods for overviews of reviews targeted for specific groups, such as children, need more elaboration.
BACKGROUND: To date, the Cochrane Child Health Field has published 18 overviews of reviews in our journal, Evidence-based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. In this article, we highlight some of the logistical and methodological challenges of producing such syntheses. As this is a new and evolving publication type, we hope that our experience will benefit others who engage in this process. Current Methods: We discuss the process we have developed to produce overviews of reviews relevant to our mandate, including identification of the research question, establishment of the author team, selection of outcomes and included SRs, and presentation of findings. Ongoing Development: We discuss the lessons we have learned, outstanding challenges for overview authors, and the limitations of overviews. CONCLUSIONS: Overviews of reviews are only as good as the SRs and primary studies on which they are based; gaps or lack of currency in this evidence will weaken the overview of reviews. Future directions in this work must address questions of bias and loss of information. Methods for overviews of reviews targeted for specific groups, such as children, need more elaboration.
Authors: Kunal N Karmali; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; David C Goff; Darshak M Sanghavi; Nina C Brown; Liliya Korenovska; Mark D Huffman Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jerry Suls; Jazmin N Mogavero; Louise Falzon; Linda S Pescatello; Emily A Hennessy; Karina W Davidson Journal: Health Psychol Rev Date: 2019-11-29
Authors: Jennifer L Matjasko; Alana M Vivolo-Kantor; Greta M Massetti; Kristin M Holland; Melissa K Holt; Jason Dela Cruz Journal: Aggress Violent Behav Date: 2012 Nov-Dec
Authors: Gabriela J Prutsky; Juan Pablo Domecq; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Lisa A Grohskopf; Larry J Prokop; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2012-12-29
Authors: P Lina Santaguida; Homa Keshavarz; Lisa C Carlesso; Margaret Lomotan; Anita Gross; Joy C Macdermid; David M Walton Journal: Open Orthop J Date: 2013-09-20
Authors: Alexander G Mathioudakis; Michael Miligkos; Cristina Boccabella; Gioulinta S Alimani; Adnan Custovic; A Deschildre; Francine Monique Ducharme; Omer Kalayci; Clare Murray; Antonio Nieto Garcia; Wanda Phipatanakul; David Price; Aziz Sheikh; Ioana Octavia Agache; Leonard Bacharier; Apostolos Beloukas; Andrew Bentley; Matteo Bonini; Jose A Castro-Rodriguez; Giuseppe De Carlo; Timothy Craig; Zuzana Diamant; Wojciech Feleszko; Tim Felton; James E Gern; Jonathan Grigg; Gunilla Hedlin; Elham M Hossny; Despo Ierodiakonou; Tuomas Jartti; Alan Kaplan; Robert F Lemanske; Peter N Le Souëf; Mika J Mäkelä; Georgios A Mathioudakis; Paolo Matricardi; Marina Mitrogiorgou; Mario Morais-Almeida; Karthik Nagaraju; Effie Papageorgiou; Helena Pité; Paulo M C Pitrez; Petr Pohunek; Graham Roberts; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Stephen Turner; Susanne Vijverberg; Tonya A Winders; Gary Wk Wong; Paraskevi Xepapadaki; Heather J Zar; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 2.692