Literature DB >> 26061358

Harnessing NGS and Big Data Optimally: Comparison of miRNA Prediction from Assembled versus Non-assembled Sequencing Data--The Case of the Grass Aegilops tauschii Complex Genome.

Hikmet Budak1, Melda Kantar1.   

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous, non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. As high-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) and Big Data rapidly accumulate for various species, efforts for in silico identification of miRNAs intensify. Surprisingly, the effect of the input genomics sequence on the robustness of miRNA prediction was not evaluated in detail to date. In the present study, we performed a homology-based miRNA and isomiRNA prediction of the 5D chromosome of bread wheat progenitor, Aegilops tauschii, using two distinct sequence data sets as input: (1) raw sequence reads obtained from 454-GS FLX Titanium sequencing platform and (2) an assembly constructed from these reads. We also compared this method with a number of available plant sequence datasets. We report here the identification of 62 and 22 miRNAs from raw reads and the assembly, respectively, of which 16 were predicted with high confidence from both datasets. While raw reads promoted sensitivity with the high number of miRNAs predicted, 55% (12 out of 22) of the assembly-based predictions were supported by previous observations, bringing specificity forward compared to the read-based predictions, of which only 37% were supported. Importantly, raw reads could identify several repeat-related miRNAs that could not be detected with the assembly. However, raw reads could not capture 6 miRNAs, for which the stem-loops could only be covered by the relatively longer sequences from the assembly. In summary, the comparison of miRNA datasets obtained by these two strategies revealed that utilization of raw reads, as well as assemblies for in silico prediction, have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Consideration of these important nuances can benefit future miRNA identification efforts in the current age of NGS and Big Data driven life sciences innovation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26061358     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2015.0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  12 in total

1.  Root precursors of microRNAs in wild emmer and modern wheats show major differences in response to drought stress.

Authors:  Bala Ani Akpinar; Melda Kantar; Hikmet Budak
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.410

Review 2.  Plant miRNAs: biogenesis, organization and origins.

Authors:  Hikmet Budak; B Ani Akpinar
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.410

3.  MicroRNAs in model and complex organisms.

Authors:  Hikmet Budak; Baohong Zhang
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  A large-scale chromosome-specific SNP discovery guideline.

Authors:  Bala Ani Akpinar; Stuart Lucas; Hikmet Budak
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.410

5.  Wheat miRNA ancestors: evident by transcriptome analysis of A, B, and D genome donors.

Authors:  Burcu Alptekin; Hikmet Budak
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.410

6.  An Integrated Bioinformatics and Functional Approach for miRNA Validation.

Authors:  Sombir Rao; Sonia Balyan; Chandni Bansal; Saloni Mathur
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 7.  Molecular Pathology and Personalized Medicine: The Dawn of a New Era in Companion Diagnostics-Practical Considerations about Companion Diagnostics for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer.

Authors:  Till Plönes; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Erich Stoelben; Christina Limmroth; Oliver Schildgen; Verena Schildgen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2016-01-15

8.  RNA Sequencing and Co-expressed Long Non-coding RNA in Modern and Wild Wheats.

Authors:  Halise Busra Cagirici; Burcu Alptekin; Hikmet Budak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Response of microRNAs to cold treatment in the young spikes of common wheat.

Authors:  Guoqi Song; Rongzhi Zhang; Shujuan Zhang; Yulian Li; Jie Gao; Xiaodong Han; Mingli Chen; Jiao Wang; Wei Li; Genying Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparison of miRNAs and Their Targets in Seed Development between Two Maize Inbred Lines by High-Throughput Sequencing and Degradome Analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Yao Wu; Cheng-Yi Tang; Yu-Min Guo; Min-Kai Yang; Rong-Wu Yang; Gui-Hua Lu; Yong-Hua Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.