| Literature DB >> 26060804 |
Tae-Jin Song1, Hyun-Ji Cho2, Yoonkyung Chang1, Kyungsun Choi1, A-Reum Jung1, Minjung Youn1, Min-Jeong Shin3, Yong-Jae Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Docosahexaenoic acid; Eicosapentaenoic acid; Fatty acids composition; ω3-polyunsaturated fatty acids, Stroke outcome
Year: 2015 PMID: 26060804 PMCID: PMC4460336 DOI: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.2.168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Stroke ISSN: 2287-6391 Impact factor: 6.967
Demographic data and comparison of clinical data according to functional outcome
Values are reported as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median [interquartile ranges].
NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
The relationship between fatty acids composition and stroke severity on admission (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score)*
*Linear regression analysis with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score as dependent and continuous variable; †Adjusted age, sex, and variables with P value < 0.1 in univariate analysis (stroke subtype, hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, fasting glucose, 16:0 palmitic acid and Σ saturated fatty acids); ‡R2 in multivariate linear regression analysis, when entering EPA: 0.305, DHA: 0.324 and Σ ω3-PUFA: 0.327, respectively.
EPA, 20:5 ω3 eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, 22:6 ω3 docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Figure 1Plots of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score for 20:5 ω3 eicosapentaenoic acid (A), 22:6 ω3 docosahexaenoic acid (B), and ω3-polyunsaturated fatty acids (C).
The relationship between fatty acids composition and poor functional outcome (mRS ≥3)*
*Binary logistic regression analysis with modified Rankin scale [0-2] as reference; †Adjusted age, sex, and variables with P value < 0.1 in univariate analysis (smoking, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, stroke subtype, and 16:0 palmitic acid); ‡R2=0.542 after entering EPA, P value of goodness of fit=0.969; R2=0.560 after entering DHA, P value of goodness of fit=0.999; R2=0.563 after entering Σ ω3-PUFA, P value of goodness of fit=0.999.
mRS, modified Rankin Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; EPA, 20:5 ω3 eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, 22:6 ω3 docosahexaenoic acid; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids.