Literature DB >> 26060571

Evaluating the Y chromosomal STR dating in deep-rooting pedigrees.

Chuan-Chao Wang1, Hui Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Y chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) has been used in time estimations for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) lineages or eminent persons. But to choose which mutation rate and estimation method in the Y chromosome dating is controversial, since different rates and methods can result in several-fold deviation.
FINDINGS: We used two deep-rooting pedigrees with full records and reliable dates to directly evaluate the Y chromosomal STR mutation rates and dating methods. We found that the Y chromosomal genealogical mutation rates (OMRB and lmMR) in BATWING method can give the best-fit estimation for historical lineage dating.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validated a very efficient and reliable way for genealogy and historical anthropology researches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mutation rate; STR; Time estimation; Y chromosome

Year:  2015        PMID: 26060571      PMCID: PMC4460972          DOI: 10.1186/s13323-015-0025-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Investig Genet        ISSN: 2041-2223


Findings

The paternally inherited Y chromosome has been proved to be a superb tool in inferring human population demographic history, forensic identification, and genetic genealogy [1]. There are two kinds of extremely useful markers in Y chromosome, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and short tandem repeat (STR). With a very low mutation rate on the order of 3.0 × 10−8 mutations/nucleotide/generation [2], SNP markers have been used in constructing a robust phylogeny tree linking all the Y chromosome lineages from world populations [3, 4]. However, the mutation rates of STRs are about 4 to 5 orders of magnitude higher than SNPs [5]. The high mutation rates of STRs make them extremely useful in forensic identification and population diversity estimation. The most important link between genetic diversity and human history is time, for instance, the time when a lineage originated or expanded or when a population split from another and migrated. Y-STR has also been used in time estimations for SNP lineages or eminent persons [1]. The well-known example was the determination of Genghis Khan’s lineage [6]. Although this approach is widely used, there are still many ongoing debates about the best way to use STRs in lineage dating. In particular, there are two popularly used Y chromosomal STR mutation rates, that is, the genealogical rate and the evolutionary rate. The genealogical rates are directly observed rates in father-son pairs [7]. The evolutionary rates are those calibrated against historical events, such as the divergence of the Maoris and Cook Islanders in the Pacific [8]. There are also two widely used methods in Y chromosomal STR dating, average squared distance (ASD) [9-15] and Bayesian analysis of trees with internal node generation (BATWING) method [16]. ASD method is based on the assumption that median or modal STR haplotype in a lineage is the founder haplotype [11-15]. BATWING uses a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method based on coalescent theory to generate approximate random samples from the posterior distributions of parameters [16]. To choose which mutation rate and estimation method in the Y chromosome dating is controversial, since different rates and methods can result in several-fold deviation. Recording the genealogy has been a tradition of Han Chinese, and some genealogical trees even link the contemporary individuals to their ancestors over 2000~3000 years ago, which has provided the best approach to evaluate the Y chromosomal STR dating. Here, we collected two pedigrees with full records claimed to be descendants of Duke Zhao Shi (A.D. 1057–1129) [17] and Miaorong Cào (A.D. 1341–1411) [18]. We collected blood samples from 4 male individuals of Shi clan and 14 male individuals of Cào clan. In the two pedigrees studied here, 28 meiotic events happened between Duke Zhao Shi and his latest descendant and 21 meiotic events happened between Miaorong Cào and his latest descendant. The study was under the approval of the Ethics Committee of Biological Researches at Fudan University, and all the samples were collected with the Informed Consents. For all these samples, we extracted DNA, typed phylogenetic relevant Y chromosomal SNPs as listed in the latest Y-chromosomal tree as we did in previous studies [19, 20], and amplified 17 Y-STRs (DYS19, DYS389I/II, DYS390,DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635, Y-GATA H4, and DYS385a/b) using Y-Filer kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Shi clan has been identified as haplogroup O1a1-P203 and Cào clan has been assigned as haplogroup O3a2c*-P164+, M134- (Additional file 1). Time estimation for each Y chromosomal lineage was made using both ASD and BATWING method based on 15 STRs (excluding DYS385a/b). The ages in ASD were calculated within our contemporary samples by comparing to the modal and median haplotype. It is worthy to mention that the median and modal haplotypes are the same in the two pedigrees at the used 15 loci. Four sets of Y-STR mutation rates [7] were applied in the estimations (Additional file 2). These are a widely used evolutionary mutation rate (EMR) [8], two observed genealogical mutation rates (OMRB and OMRS) [21, 22], and a genealogical mutation rate adjusted for population variation using logistic model (lmMR) [21]. A generally accepted generation time of 25 years was used to produce a time estimate in years. Through cross-cultural estimation, Fenner proposed a male generation length of 31–32 years [23], which were also used for comparison. For BATWING method, we used a model of exponential growth from an initially constant-sized population. We applied weakly informative prior distributions parameters in BATWING estimations to avoid possible biases caused by parameter changing. For the initial effective population size (N), we used a broad prior gamma (1, 0.0001) (mean = 10,000, SD = 10,000). For population growth rate per generation (α), we also used the broad prior distributions gamma (2, 400) (mean = 0.005, SD = 0.0035). The time in coalescent units when exponential growth (β) began was used gamma (2, 1) (mean = 2, SD = 1.41) [24]. A total of one million MCMC samples were collected per run in BATWING, and the first 3000 were discarded as burn-ins. The time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) is calculated using the product of the estimated population size N and the height of the tree T (in coalescent units). The results were given in Table 1. Shi clan in this study can trace their common ancestor to Duke Zhao Shi 885–957 years ago (ya) and Cào clan can trace their ancestor to Miaorong Cào 603–673 ya. The BATWING method applying genealogical mutation rates, OMRB and lmMR, gave the best-fit estimations, 859.7 and 887.0 ya for Duke Zhao Shi and 671.1 and 704.5 ya for Miaorong Cào. The OMRS rate in BATWING has underestimated the time for Shi and Cào at about 200~270 and 70~140 years shorter, respectively. However, the estimates using evolutionary mutation rate are 3~4 times larger than the real time. On the contrary, the ASD method using genealogical mutation rates has given the results 3~4 times smaller than the real time. While applying evolutionary rate, ASD gives 1207.7 and 1035.2 ya for Shi and Cào, respectively, although quite near their real living time but still has 200~300-year deviation. We changed the generation time to 31~32 years as Fenner proposed [19] and also got very similar results.
Table 1

Time estimation in two deep-rooting pedigrees using both BATWING and ASD method (time in years)

ClanOMRBOMRSlmMREMR
TMRCA95 % CITMRCA95 % CITMRCA95 % CITMRCA95 % CI
BATWINGShi (885~957 ya)859.7199.5–3543.6686.2154.7–2895.3887.0241.9–2577.73424.5833.1–14,101.0
Cào (603~673 ya)671.1211.5–1833.5534.0165.1–1480.0704.5222.2–1925.22658.4840.6–7957.9
TMRCASETMRCASETMRCASETMRCASE
ASDShi (885~957 ya)315.9417.3242.7342.2379.7501.01207.71593.595
Cào (885~957 ya)237.1121.9221.9115.1206.2101.11035.2509.61
Time estimation in two deep-rooting pedigrees using both BATWING and ASD method (time in years) In this study, we used two deep-rooting pedigrees with full records and reliable dates to directly evaluate the Y chromosomal STR mutation rates and dating methods. We found that the Y chromosomal genealogical mutation rates (OMRB and lmMR) in BATWING method can give the best-fit estimation for historical lineage dating, which could provide a very efficient and reliable way for genealogy and historical anthropology researches.
  20 in total

1.  Y chromosomes traveling south: the cohen modal haplotype and the origins of the Lemba--the "Black Jews of Southern Africa".

Authors:  M G Thomas; T Parfitt; D A Weiss; K Skorecki; J F Wilson; M le Roux; N Bradman; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Estimating divergence time with the use of microsatellite genetic distances: impacts of population growth and gene flow.

Authors:  L A Zhivotovsky
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The genetic legacy of the Mongols.

Authors:  Tatiana Zerjal; Yali Xue; Giorgio Bertorelle; R Spencer Wells; Weidong Bao; Suling Zhu; Raheel Qamar; Qasim Ayub; Aisha Mohyuddin; Songbin Fu; Pu Li; Nadira Yuldasheva; Ruslan Ruzibakiev; Jiujin Xu; Qunfang Shu; Ruofu Du; Huanming Yang; Matthew E Hurles; Elizabeth Robinson; Tudevdagva Gerelsaikhan; Bumbein Dashnyam; S Qasim Mehdi; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The effective mutation rate at Y chromosome short tandem repeats, with application to human population-divergence time.

Authors:  Lev A Zhivotovsky; Peter A Underhill; Cengiz Cinnioğlu; Manfred Kayser; Bharti Morar; Toomas Kivisild; Rosaria Scozzari; Fulvio Cruciani; Giovanni Destro-Bisol; Gabriella Spedini; Geoffrey K Chambers; Rene J Herrera; Kiau Kiun Yong; David Gresham; Ivailo Tournev; Marcus W Feldman; Luba Kalaydjieva
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Multiple origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y chromosome evidence for both Near Eastern and European ancestries.

Authors:  Doron M Behar; Mark G Thomas; Karl Skorecki; Michael F Hammer; Ekaterina Bulygina; Dror Rosengarten; Abigail L Jones; Karen Held; Vivian Moses; David Goldstein; Neil Bradman; Michael E Weale
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Human Y chromosome base-substitution mutation rate measured by direct sequencing in a deep-rooting pedigree.

Authors:  Yali Xue; Qiuju Wang; Quan Long; Bee Ling Ng; Harold Swerdlow; John Burton; Carl Skuce; Ruth Taylor; Zahra Abdellah; Yali Zhao; Daniel G MacArthur; Michael A Quail; Nigel P Carter; Huanming Yang; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  A worldwide survey of human male demographic history based on Y-SNP and Y-STR data from the HGDP-CEPH populations.

Authors:  Wentao Shi; Qasim Ayub; Mark Vermeulen; Rong-guang Shao; Sofia Zuniga; Kristiaan van der Gaag; Peter de Knijff; Manfred Kayser; Yali Xue; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Inferring human history in East Asia from Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Chuan-Chao Wang; Hui Li
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2013-06-03

10.  A comparison of Y-chromosomal lineage dating using either resequencing or Y-SNP plus Y-STR genotyping.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Qasim Ayub; Yali Xue; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.882

View more
  4 in total

1.  Molecular genealogy of Tusi Lu's family reveals their paternal relationship with Jochi, Genghis Khan's eldest son.

Authors:  Shao-Qing Wen; Hong-Bing Yao; Pan-Xin Du; Lan-Hai Wei; Xin-Zhu Tong; Ling-Xiang Wang; Chuan-Chao Wang; Bo-Yan Zhou; Mei-Sen Shi; Maxat Zhabagin; Jiucun Wang; Dan Xu; Li Jin; Hui Li
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  Toward a consensus on SNP and STR mutation rates on the human Y-chromosome.

Authors:  O Balanovsky
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  A glimpse at the intricate mosaic of ethnicities from Mesopotamia: Paternal lineages of the Northern Iraqi Arabs, Kurds, Syriacs, Turkmens and Yazidis.

Authors:  Serkan Dogan; Cemal Gurkan; Mustafa Dogan; Hasan Emin Balkaya; Ramazan Tunc; Damla Kanliada Demirdov; Nihad Ahmed Ameen; Damir Marjanovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dispersals of the Siberian Y-chromosome haplogroup Q in Eurasia.

Authors:  Yun-Zhi Huang; Horolma Pamjav; Pavel Flegontov; Vlastimil Stenzl; Shao-Qing Wen; Xin-Zhu Tong; Chuan-Chao Wang; Ling-Xiang Wang; Lan-Hai Wei; Jing-Yi Gao; Li Jin; Hui Li
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.291

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.