Joseph Birundu Mogendi1, Hans De Steur2, Xavier Gellynck2, Hibbah Araba Saeed3, Anselimo Makokha4. 1. Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. ; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Mount Kenya University 342-01000, Thika, Kenya. 2. Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. 3. School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, (ScHARR); Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. 4. Department of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Although it is crucial to identify those children likely to be treated in an appropriate nutrition rehabilitation programme and discharge them at the appropriate time, there is no golden standard for such identification. The current study examined the appropriateness of using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference for the identification, follow-up and discharge of malnourished children. We also assessed its discrepancy with the Weight-for-Height based diagnosis, the rate of recovery, and the discharge criteria of the children during nutrition rehabilitation. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: The study present findings from 156 children (aged 6-59 months) attending a supplementary feeding programme at Makadara and Jericho Health Centres, Eastern District of Nairobi, Kenya. Records of age, weight, height and mid-upper arm circumference were selected at three stages of nutrition rehabilitation: admission, follow-up and discharge. The values obtained were then used to calculate z-scores as defined by WHO Anthro while estimating different diagnostic indices. RESULTS: Mid-upper arm circumference single cut-off (< 12.5 cm) was found to exhibit high values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio at both admission and discharge. Besides, children recorded higher rate of recovery at 86 days, an average increment of 0.98 cm at the rate of 0.14mm/day, and a weight gain of 13.49gm/day, albeit higher in female than their male counterparts. Nevertheless, children admitted on basis of low MUAC had a significantly higher MUAC gain than WH at 0.19mm/day and 0.13mm/day respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-upper arm circumference can be an appropriate tool for identifying malnourished children for admission to nutrition rehabilitation programs. Our results confirm the appropriateness of this tool for monitoring recovery trends and discharging the children thereafter. In principle the tool has potential to minimize nutrition rehabilitation costs, particularly in community therapeutic centres in developing countries.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Although it is crucial to identify those children likely to be treated in an appropriate nutrition rehabilitation programme and discharge them at the appropriate time, there is no golden standard for such identification. The current study examined the appropriateness of using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference for the identification, follow-up and discharge of malnourished children. We also assessed its discrepancy with the Weight-for-Height based diagnosis, the rate of recovery, and the discharge criteria of the children during nutrition rehabilitation. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: The study present findings from 156 children (aged 6-59 months) attending a supplementary feeding programme at Makadara and Jericho Health Centres, Eastern District of Nairobi, Kenya. Records of age, weight, height and mid-upper arm circumference were selected at three stages of nutrition rehabilitation: admission, follow-up and discharge. The values obtained were then used to calculate z-scores as defined by WHO Anthro while estimating different diagnostic indices. RESULTS: Mid-upper arm circumference single cut-off (< 12.5 cm) was found to exhibit high values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio at both admission and discharge. Besides, children recorded higher rate of recovery at 86 days, an average increment of 0.98 cm at the rate of 0.14mm/day, and a weight gain of 13.49gm/day, albeit higher in female than their male counterparts. Nevertheless, children admitted on basis of low MUAC had a significantly higher MUAC gain than WH at 0.19mm/day and 0.13mm/day respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-upper arm circumference can be an appropriate tool for identifying malnourished children for admission to nutrition rehabilitation programs. Our results confirm the appropriateness of this tool for monitoring recovery trends and discharging the children thereafter. In principle the tool has potential to minimize nutrition rehabilitation costs, particularly in community therapeutic centres in developing countries.
Authors: Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Tahmeed Ahmed; Robert E Black; Simon Cousens; Kathryn Dewey; Elsa Giugliani; Batool A Haider; Betty Kirkwood; Saul S Morris; H P S Sachdev; Meera Shekar Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-02-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nael Lapidus; Andrea Minetti; Ali Djibo; Philippe J Guerin; Sarah Hustache; Valérie Gaboulaud; Rebecca F Grais Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mueni Mutunga; Alexandra Rutishauser-Perera; Arnaud Laillou; Sophonneary Prak; Jacques Berger; Frank T Wieringa; Paluku Bahwere Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Franck G B Alé; Kevin P Q Phelan; Hassan Issa; Isabelle Defourny; Guillaume Le Duc; Geza Harczi; Kader Issaley; Sani Sayadi; Nassirou Ousmane; Issoufou Yahaya; Mark Myatt; André Briend; Thierry Allafort-Duverger; Susan Shepherd; Nikki Blackwell Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2016-09-06
Authors: Angeline Grant; James Njiru; Edgar Okoth; Imelda Awino; André Briend; Samuel Murage; Saida Abdirahman; Mark Myatt Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2018-02-22