Literature DB >> 26059810

Understanding replication fork progression, stability, and chromosome fragility by exploiting the Suppressor of Underreplication protein.

Jared T Nordman1, Terry L Orr-Weaver1.   

Abstract

There are many layers of regulation governing DNA replication to ensure that genetic information is accurately transmitted from mother cell to daughter cell. While much of the control occurs at the level of origin selection and firing, less is known about how replication fork progression is controlled throughout the genome. In Drosophila polytene cells, specific regions of the genome become repressed for DNA replication, resulting in underreplication and decreased copy number. Importantly, underreplicated domains share properties with common fragile sites. The Suppressor of Underreplication protein SUUR is essential for this repression. Recent work established that SUUR functions by directly inhibiting replication fork progression, raising several interesting questions as to how replication fork progression and stability can be modulated within targeted regions of the genome. Here we discuss potential mechanisms by which replication fork inhibition can be achieved and the consequences this has on genome stability and copy number control.
© 2015 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; Drosophila; common fragile sites; endocycle; genome stability; polyploidy; underreplication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059810      PMCID: PMC4556369          DOI: 10.1002/bies.201500021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  44 in total

Review 1.  Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect.

Authors:  David M Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture.

Authors:  D M Gilbert; S-I Takebayashi; T Ryba; J Lu; B D Pope; K A Wilson; I Hiratani
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2010-12-07

3.  Asynchronous replication of imprinted genes is established in the gametes and maintained during development.

Authors:  I Simon; T Tenzen; B E Reubinoff; D Hillman; J R McCarrey; H Cedar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Non replicating DNA in Drosophila.

Authors:  G T Rudkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Developmental control of the DNA replication and transcription programs.

Authors:  Jared Nordman; Sharon Li; Thomas Eng; David Macalpine; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair.

Authors:  Irene Chiolo; Aki Minoda; Serafin U Colmenares; Aris Polyzos; Sylvain V Costes; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site.

Authors:  Anne Letessier; Gaël A Millot; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Anne-Marie Lachagès; Nicolas Vogt; R Scott Hansen; Bernard Malfoy; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells.

Authors:  Guillaume J Filion; Joke G van Bemmel; Ulrich Braunschweig; Wendy Talhout; Jop Kind; Lucas D Ward; Wim Brugman; Inês J de Castro; Ron M Kerkhoven; Harmen J Bussemaker; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  BRG1 co-localizes with DNA replication factors and is required for efficient replication fork progression.

Authors:  Stephanie M Cohen; Paul D Chastain; Gary B Rosson; Beezly S Groh; Bernard E Weissman; David G Kaufman; Scott J Bultman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  DNA Replication Control During Drosophila Development: Insights into the Onset of S Phase, Replication Initiation, and Fork Progression.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  DNA Remodeling by Strict Partial Endoreplication in Orchids, an Original Process in the Plant Kingdom.

Authors:  Spencer C Brown; Mickaël Bourge; Nicolas Maunoury; Maurice Wong; Michele Wolfe Bianchi; Sandra Lepers-Andrzejewski; Pascale Besse; Sonja Siljak-Yakovlev; Michel Dron; Béatrice Satiat-Jeunemaître
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; George W Bell; Helena Kashevsky; Jessica R Von Stetina; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Replication timing analysis in polyploid cells reveals Rif1 uses multiple mechanisms to promote underreplication in Drosophila.

Authors:  Souradip Das; Madison Caballero; Tatyana Kolesnikova; Igor Zhimulev; Amnon Koren; Jared Nordman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Functional dissection of Drosophila melanogaster SUUR protein influence on H3K27me3 profile.

Authors:  Olga V Posukh; Daniil A Maksimov; Petr P Laktionov; Dmitry E Koryakov; Stepan N Belyakin
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.954

6.  Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alexander Munden; Zhan Rong; Amanda Sun; Rama Gangula; Simon Mallal; Jared T Nordman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 8.713

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.