Literature DB >> 2605968

Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methodologic issues.

N K Aaronson1.   

Abstract

Historically, health-related quality of life research has been carried out at a descriptive level, providing rich data regarding the impact of disease and treatment on the physical, functional, psychologic, and social health of varying patient populations. More recently, there has been growing interest in incorporating psychosocial or "quality of life" outcome measures into clinical trials of medical interventions, particularly in the chronic diseases. This article reviews a number of the central methodologic issues surrounding the development or selection of quality of life measures appropriate for use in clinical trials. Topics discussed include the following: 1. Who should assess quality of life? 2. What should be assessed? 3. What means of data collection should be used, e.g., interviews, questionnaires or diaries? 4. Should the focus of the quality of life measures be generic or disease specific? 5. What are some of the considerations for response scales and for the time frame of questions addressing the quality of life? 6. What psychometric properties should be considered in evaluation of a questionnaire assessing quality of life? Additional attention is directed toward research design and implementation issues in clinical trial-based quality of life studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2605968     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  35 in total

1.  A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice.

Authors:  D Moher; K Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

Review 3.  Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life.

Authors:  B L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-08

Review 4.  Statistical versus quantitative significance in the socioeconomic evaluation of medicines.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; M F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Quality of life in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients prior to and after pancreas and kidney transplantation in relation to organ function.

Authors:  W Piehlmeier; M Bullinger; J Nusser; A König; W D Illner; D Abendroth; W Land; R Landgraf
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  The potential of biotechnology to improve the quality of life of patients with renal failure.

Authors:  W E Bloembergen; A Laupacis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  A simple quality of life questionnaire for patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jo Krysa; Monica Lyons; Andrew B Williams
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  On the generalizability of statistical expressions of health related quality of life instrument responsiveness: a data synthesis.

Authors:  M M Murawski; P A Miederhoff
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Factors associated with PISQ-12 completion in an academic urogynecology population.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; David M O'Sullivan; Christine A LaSala
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.