Literature DB >> 22386399

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal masses: critical assessment of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of stage T2a and T2b tumors.

Phillip M Pierorazio1, Elias S Hyams, Brian M Lin, Jeffrey K Mullins, Mohamad E Allaf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of >7 cm renal tumors treated with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) at a high-volume academic center. The indications for LRN have expanded to include larger (>7 cm) lesions.
METHODS: The Institutional Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery Database (1994 to the present) was reviewed for patients undergoing LRN for >7-cm masses (American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical Stage T2N0M0).
RESULTS: Of 200 patients, 138 (69.0%) had tumors >7.0-10 cm and 62 (31.0%) had tumors >10 cm. The patients with tumors >10 cm presented more often with symptoms, most often hematuria, and more often had high-grade tumors (68% vs 44%, P = .005). Also, a greater proportion were papillary renal cell carcinoma (23% vs 14%, P = .09) and were more often upstaged (21% vs 9%, P = .02). Of the 200 tumors, 74 (37%) were upstaged, 58 (29%) with perinephric extension and 26 (13%) with renal vein invasion. Larger tumors had greater blood loss on average (406 vs 288 mL, respectively, P = .1) and were converted to open surgery more often (13.8% vs 2.1%, P = .001). A total of 47 patients (22.3%) experienced a postoperative complication. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival rate was 62.4% and 92.9%, respectively. The significant predictors of recurrence-free survival in the multivariate model were clear cell histologic type, high Fuhrman grade, renal vein invasion, and perinephric extension. Of note, pT2b was not a predictor of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: LRN can have favorable perioperative and oncologic outcomes for large (>7 cm) renal masses, with an open conversion rate and complication rate of 5% and 20%, respectively. Clear cell histologic features, high-grade tumors, renal vein invasion, and perinephric extension, but not tumor size, were poor prognostic indicators in this cohort. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386399     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  The Effect of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes After Major Surgery: Results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2005-2011.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Kaustav Majumder; Marianne Schmid; James O Peabody; Mark A Preston; Adam S Kibel; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Victor Kapoor; Craig G Rogers; Wooju Jeong; Dane E Klett; Julian Hanske; Christian P Meyer; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparisons of oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies in patients with clinical T2 renal cell carcinoma (≥7cm).

Authors:  Hakmin Lee; Chung Un Lee; Jae Ho Yoo; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han-Yong Choi; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Seong Il Seo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Robot-assisted renal surgery: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Manuela Hiess; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-24

5.  Propensity-matched pair analysis of safety and efficacy between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of large renal masses (>10 cm): a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xinwen Nian; Huamao Ye; Wei Zhang; Kaixuan Zhang; Xu Gao; Bo Yang; Jianguo Hou; Chuanliang Xu; Linhui Wang; Yan Wang; Wenhui Zhang; Xiaolei Shi
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.