Literature DB >> 26059232

Impact of the calculation algorithm on biexponential fitting of diffusion-weighted MRI in upper abdominal organs.

Sebastiano Barbieri1, Olivio F Donati2, Johannes M Froehlich1, Harriet C Thoeny1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the variability, precision, and accuracy of six different algorithms (Levenberg-Marquardt, Trust-Region, Fixed-Dp , Segmented-Unconstrained, Segmented-Constrained, and Bayesian-Probability) for computing intravoxel-incoherent-motion-related parameters in upper abdominal organs.
METHODS: Following the acquisition of abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images of 10 healthy men, six distinct algorithms were employed to compute intravoxel-incoherent-motion-related parameters in the left and right liver lobe, pancreas, spleen, renal cortex, and renal medulla. Algorithms were evaluated regarding inter-reader and intersubject variability. Comparability of results was assessed by analyses of variance. The algorithms' precision and accuracy were investigated on simulated data.
RESULTS: A Bayesian-Probability based approach was associated with very low inter-reader variability (average Intraclass Correlation Coefficients: 96.5-99.6%), the lowest inter-subject variability (Coefficients of Variation [CV] for the pure diffusion coefficient Dt : 3.8% in the renal medulla, 6.6% in the renal cortex, 10.4-12.1% in the left and right liver lobe, 15.3% in the spleen, 15.8% in the pancreas; for the perfusion fraction Fp : 15.5% on average; for the pseudodiffusion coefficient Dp : 25.8% on average), and the highest precision and accuracy. Results differed significantly (P < 0.05) across algorithms in all anatomical regions.
CONCLUSION: The Bayesian-Probability algorithm should be preferred when computing intravoxel-incoherent-motion-related parameters in upper abdominal organs.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; abdominal; algorithm; intravoxel-incoherent-motion; least-squares; segmented

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059232     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  26 in total

Review 1.  Liver intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of published data on normal values and applications for fibrosis and tumor evaluation.

Authors:  Yáo T Li; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Jing Yuan; Weitian Chen; Romaric Loffroy; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) incorporation into an intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR model to measure cerebral hypoperfusion induced by hyperventilation challenge in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Aude Pavilla; Giulio Gambarota; Alessandro Arrigo; Mehdi Mejdoubi; Régis Duvauferrier; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Comparison of methods for estimation of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f).

Authors:  Oscar Jalnefjord; Mats Andersson; Mikael Montelius; Göran Starck; Anna-Karin Elf; Viktor Johanson; Johanna Svensson; Maria Ljungberg
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: challenges and some solutions for the quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion.

Authors:  Yi Xiang J Wang; Hua Huang; Cun-Jing Zheng; Ben-Heng Xiao; Olivier Chevallier; Wei Wang
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dailin Rong; Yize Mao; Wanming Hu; Shuhang Xu; Jun Wang; Haoqiang He; Shengping Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of early cervical carcinoma: correlation between imaging parameters and tumor-stroma ratio.

Authors:  Xiangsheng Li; Ping Wang; Dechang Li; Hongxian Zhu; Limin Meng; Yunlong Song; Lizhi Xie; Jianping Zhu; Tao Yu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Bi-exponential fitting excluding b=0 data improves the scan-rescan stability of liver IVIM parameter measures and particularly so for the perfusion fraction.

Authors:  Cun-Jing Zheng; Ben-Heng Xiao; Hua Huang; Nan Zhou; Tai-Yu Yan; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

8.  Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim; Steven H Baete; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Simultaneously spatial and temporal Higher-Order Total Variations for noise suppression and motion reduction in DCE and IVIM.

Authors:  Renjie He; Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Sweet Ping Ng; Rachel B Ger; Hesham Elhalawani; Baher A Elgohari; Kristina H Young; Katherine A Hutcheson; Clifton D Fuller; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-10

10.  Continuous diffusion spectrum computation for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney tubule system.

Authors:  Joāo S Periquito; Thomas Gladytz; Jason M Millward; Paula Ramos Delgado; Kathleen Cantow; Dirk Grosenick; Luis Hummel; Ariane Anger; Kaixuan Zhao; Erdmann Seeliger; Andreas Pohlmann; Sonia Waiczies; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.