Literature DB >> 26058469

Bacterial sensing underlies artificial sweetener-induced growth of gut Lactobacillus.

Kristian Daly1, Alistair C Darby1, Neil Hall1, Mark C Wilkinson1, Pisut Pongchaikul1, David Bravo2, Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey1.   

Abstract

Disruption in stable establishment of commensal gut microbiota by early weaning is an important factor in susceptibility of young animals to enteric disorders. The artificial sweetener SUCRAM [consisting of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) and saccharin] included in piglets' feed reduces incidence of enteric disease. Pyrosequencing of pig caecal 16S rRNA gene amplicons identified 25 major families encompassing seven bacterial classes with Bacteroidia, Clostridia and Bacilli dominating the microbiota. There were significant shifts in microbial composition in pigs maintained on a diet containing SUCRAM, establishing SUCRAM as a major influence driving bacterial community dynamics. The most notable change was a significant increase of Lactobacillaceae population abundance, almost entirely due to a single phylotype, designated Lactobacillus 4228. The sweetener-induced increase in Lactobacillaceae was observed in two different breeds of pigs signifying a general effect. We isolated Lactobacillus 4228, sequenced its genome and found it to be related to Lactobacillus amylovorus. In vitro analyses of Lactobacillus 4228 growth characteristics showed that presence of NHDC significantly reduces the lag phase of growth and enhances expression of specific sugar transporters, independently of NHDC metabolism. This study suggests that sensing of NHDC by a bacterial plasma membrane receptor underlies sweetener-induced growth of a health promoting gut bacterium.
© 2015 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26058469     DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  10 in total

Review 1.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory.

Authors:  Jane Shearer; Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  An Overview of Current Knowledge of the Gut Microbiota and Low-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; Cindy D Davis; Alexandra Lobach; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2021 May-Jun

4.  High-dose saccharin supplementation does not induce gut microbiota changes or glucose intolerance in healthy humans and mice.

Authors:  Joan Serrano; Kathleen R Smith; Audra L Crouch; Vandana Sharma; Fanchao Yi; Veronika Vargova; Traci E LaMoia; Lydia M Dupont; Vanida Serna; Fenfen Tang; Laisa Gomes-Dias; Joshua J Blakeslee; Emmanuel Hatzakis; Scott N Peterson; Matthew Anderson; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 14.650

5.  Effects of Sweeteners on the Gut Microbiota: A Review of Experimental Studies and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda; Julio Plaza-Díaz; Maria Jose Sáez-Lara; Angel Gil
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  The Effect of Milk Replacer Composition on the Intestinal Microbiota of Pre-ruminant Dairy Calves.

Authors:  James Badman; Kristian Daly; Jennifer Kelly; Andrew W Moran; John Cameron; Ian Watson; John Newbold; Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Interactions of Non-Nutritive Artificial Sweeteners with the Microbiome in Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Valerie Harrington; Lilian Lau; Alexander Crits-Christoph; Jotham Suez
Journal:  Immunometabolism       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 8.  Food Additives Associated with Gut Microbiota Alterations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Friends or Enemies?

Authors:  Caiguang Liu; Shukai Zhan; Zhenyi Tian; Na Li; Tong Li; Dongxuan Wu; Zhirong Zeng; Xiaojun Zhuang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.706

9.  Bacterial Diversity in Traditional Doogh in Comparison to Industrial Doogh.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Sayevand; Farzaneh Bakhtiary; Angelika Pointner; Marlene Remely; Berit Hippe; Hedayat Hosseini; Alexander Haslberger
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 10.  Studies of xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis: from correlation to mechanisms.

Authors:  Liang Chi; Pengcheng Tu; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.