Literature DB >> 26057261

Effect-based trigger values for in vitro bioassays: Reading across from existing water quality guideline values.

Beate I Escher1, Peta A Neale2, Frederic D L Leusch3.   

Abstract

Cell-based bioassays are becoming increasingly popular in water quality assessment. The new generations of reporter-gene assays are very sensitive and effects are often detected in very clean water types such as drinking water and recycled water. For monitoring applications it is therefore imperative to derive trigger values that differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable effect levels. In this proof-of-concept paper, we propose a statistical method to read directly across from chemical guideline values to trigger values without the need to perform in vitro to in vivo extrapolations. The derivation is based on matching effect concentrations with existing chemical guideline values and filtering out appropriate chemicals that are responsive in the given bioassays at concentrations in the range of the guideline values. To account for the mixture effects of many chemicals acting together in a complex water sample, we propose bioanalytical equivalents that integrate the effects of groups of chemicals with the same mode of action that act in a concentration-additive manner. Statistical distribution methods are proposed to derive a specific effect-based trigger bioanalytical equivalent concentration (EBT-BEQ) for each bioassay of environmental interest that targets receptor-mediated toxicity. Even bioassays that are indicative of the same mode of action have slightly different numeric trigger values due to differences in their inherent sensitivity. The algorithm was applied to 18 cell-based bioassays and 11 provisional effect-based trigger bioanalytical equivalents were derived as an illustrative example using the 349 chemical guideline values protective for human health of the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling. We illustrate the applicability using the example of a diverse set of water samples including recycled water. Most recycled water samples were compliant with the proposed triggers while wastewater effluent would not have been compliant with a few. The approach is readily adaptable to any water type and guideline or regulatory framework and can be expanded from the protection goal of human health to environmental protection targets. While this work constitutes a proof of principle, the applicability remains limited at present due to insufficient experimental bioassay data on individual regulated chemicals and the derived effect-based trigger values are of course only provisional. Once the experimental database is expanded and made more robust, the proposed effect-based trigger values may provide guidance in a regulatory context.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical equivalent concentration; Bioassay; Human health; In vitro; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26057261     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  11 in total

1.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Risk Characterization of Environmental Samples Using In Vitro Bioactivity and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations Data.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Dillon Lloyd; Yi-Hui Zhou; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessing the role of different dissolved organic carbon and bromide concentrations for disinfection by-product formation using chemical analysis and bioanalysis.

Authors:  Peta A Neale; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  In vitro effects-based method and water quality screening model for use in pre- and post-distribution treated waters.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; Nicola Evans; Luke R Iwanowicz; Joshua M Allen; Elizabeth Wagner; Katherine Bokenkamp; Susan D Richardson; Michael J Plewa; Paul M Bradley; Kristin M Romanok; Dana W Kolpin; Justin M Conley; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Towards Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for the Australasian Region of Oceania.

Authors:  Sally Gaw; Andrew Harford; Vincent Pettigrove; Graham Sevicke-Jones; Therese Manning; James Ataria; Tom Cresswell; Katherine A Dafforn; Frederic Dl Leusch; Bradley Moggridge; Marcus Cameron; John Chapman; Gary Coates; Anne Colville; Claire Death; Kimberly Hageman; Kathryn Hassell; Molly Hoak; Jennifer Gadd; Dianne F Jolley; Ali Karami; Konstantinos Kotzakoulakis; Richard Lim; Nicole McRae; Leon Metzeling; Thomas Mooney; Jackie Myers; Andrew Pearson; Minna Saaristo; Dave Sharley; Julia Stuthe; Oliver Sutherland; Oliver Thomas; Louis Tremblay; Waitangi Wood; Alistair Ba Boxall; Murray A Rudd; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Effects of treated wastewater on the ecotoxicity of small streams - Unravelling the contribution of chemicals causing effects.

Authors:  Cornelia Kienle; Etiënne L M Vermeirssen; Andrea Schifferli; Heinz Singer; Christian Stamm; Inge Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Environmental Footprint of Wastewater Treatment: A Step Forward in the Use of Toxicological Tools.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertanza; Jennifer Boniotti; Elisabetta Ceretti; Donatella Feretti; Giovanna Mazzoleni; Michele Menghini; Roberta Pedrazzani; Nathalie Steimberg; Chiara Urani; Gaia Claudia Viviana Viola; Ilaria Zerbini; Emanuele Ziliani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Towards a holistic and solution-oriented monitoring of chemical status of European water bodies: how to support the EU strategy for a non-toxic environment?

Authors:  Werner Brack; Beate I Escher; Erik Müller; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Tobias Schulze; Jaroslav Slobodnik; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.