Mary J Mulcahey1, Stephen M Haley, Mary D Slavin, Pamela A Kisala, Pengsheng Ni, David S Tulsky, Alan M Jette. 1. *Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA †Boston University School of Public Health, Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston, MA ‡Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE §Kessler Foundation Research Center, West Orange, NJ.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide patient-reported outcome measures that are designed as being universally relevant across health conditions, low burden, and precise. A major problem for research and clinical practice in cerebral palsy (CP) is the void of outcomes instruments that are capable of evaluating the wide range of abilities and broad age spectrum inherent in this clinical population. Given the tremendous potential of PROMIS, the research questions for this study were "How do PROMIS pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms detect change in children with CP following elective musculoskeletal surgery?" and "How do PROMIS instruments compare to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cerebral Palsy Module Version 3.0 (PedsQL CP), Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), the Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Gross Motor Functional Measure (GMFM)." METHODS: PROMIS Pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms and the PedsQL, PODCI, TUG, and GMFM were administered before and after surgery. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated and, exposure rates for the PROMIS item banks were examined. RESULTS: ES and SRM for all PROMIS Pediatric Measures were nonsignificant. PedsQL CP detected significant, positive change in mobility at 6 (ES=0.26; SRM=0.31) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.36) months; pain at 12 months (ES=0.29; SRM=0.34); and fatigue at 6 (ES=0.24; SRM=0.22) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.41) months. Significant negative changes were detected by the PODCI (ES=-0.20; SRM=-0.26), GMFM (ES=-0.13; SRM=-0.24), and TUG (ES=-0.29; SRM=-0.25). Ceiling effects were high. Exposure to an appropriate range of the PROMIS Mobility item bank was limited. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS measures were less able to detect change than other measures. PROMIS measures may be improved by tailoring start/stop rules or by adding items to include content appropriate for children with mobility impairments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.
BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide patient-reported outcome measures that are designed as being universally relevant across health conditions, low burden, and precise. A major problem for research and clinical practice in cerebral palsy (CP) is the void of outcomes instruments that are capable of evaluating the wide range of abilities and broad age spectrum inherent in this clinical population. Given the tremendous potential of PROMIS, the research questions for this study were "How do PROMIS pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms detect change in children with CP following elective musculoskeletal surgery?" and "How do PROMIS instruments compare to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Cerebral Palsy Module Version 3.0 (PedsQL CP), Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), the Timed Up and Go (TUG), and the Gross Motor Functional Measure (GMFM)." METHODS: PROMIS Pediatric computer adaptive tests and short forms and the PedsQL, PODCI, TUG, and GMFM were administered before and after surgery. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated and, exposure rates for the PROMIS item banks were examined. RESULTS: ES and SRM for all PROMIS Pediatric Measures were nonsignificant. PedsQL CP detected significant, positive change in mobility at 6 (ES=0.26; SRM=0.31) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.36) months; pain at 12 months (ES=0.29; SRM=0.34); and fatigue at 6 (ES=0.24; SRM=0.22) and 12 (ES=0.36; SRM=0.41) months. Significant negative changes were detected by the PODCI (ES=-0.20; SRM=-0.26), GMFM (ES=-0.13; SRM=-0.24), and TUG (ES=-0.29; SRM=-0.25). Ceiling effects were high. Exposure to an appropriate range of the PROMIS Mobility item bank was limited. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS measures were less able to detect change than other measures. PROMIS measures may be improved by tailoring start/stop rules or by adding items to include content appropriate for children with mobility impairments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Jin-Shei Lai; Feng Tian; Wendy J Coster; Alan M Jette; Donald Straub; David Cella Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jin-Shei Lai; Brian D Stucky; David Thissen; James W Varni; Esi Morgan DeWitt; Debra E Irwin; Karin B Yeatts; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-02-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Sandra A Sherman; Kanela Hanna; Susan J Berrin; Vanessa L Malcarne; Henry G Chambers Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Debra E Irwin; Brian D Stucky; David Thissen; Esi Morgan Dewitt; Jin Shei Lai; Karin Yeatts; James W Varni; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christine Bower Baca; Barbara G Vickrey; Ron D Hays; Stefanie D Vassar; Anne T Berg Journal: Value Health Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Esi Morgan DeWitt; Brian D Stucky; David Thissen; Debra E Irwin; Michelle Langer; James W Varni; Jin-Shei Lai; Karin B Yeatts; Darren A Dewalt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Gregory B Firth; Elyse Passmore; Morgan Sangeux; Pam Thomason; Jill Rodda; Susan Donath; Paulo Selber; H Kerr Graham Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Ross S Chafetz; Feng Tian; Kathleen Montpetit; Kyle Watson; George Gorton; M J Mulcahey Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Hilary Bertisch; Frederick P Rivara; Pamela A Kisala; Jin Wang; Keith Owen Yeates; Dennis Durbin; Mark R Zonfrillo; Michael J Bell; Nancy Temkin; David S Tulsky Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ted Kheng Siang Ng; Patricia C Heyn; Alex Tagawa; Christina Coughlan; James J Carollo Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Pamela L Wolters; Staci Martin; Vanessa L Merker; James H Tonsgard; Sondra E Solomon; Andrea Baldwin; Amanda L Bergner; Karin Walsh; Heather L Thompson; Kathy L Gardner; Cynthia M Hingtgen; Elizabeth Schorry; William N Dudley; Barbara Franklin Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wendy J Coster; Pengsheng Ni; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Ratna Nandakumar; Mary Jane Mulcahey; David S Tulsky; Alan M Jette Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Kristen S Higgins; Perri R Tutelman; Christine T Chambers; Holly O Witteman; Melanie Barwick; Penny Corkum; Doris Grant; Jennifer N Stinson; Chitra Lalloo; Sue Robins; Rita Orji; Isabel Jordan Journal: Pain Rep Date: 2018-09-11
Authors: Janan Chandrananth; Richard Hannan; Daniel Bouton; Ellen Raney; Susan Sienko; Patrick Do; Jeremy P Bauer Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 2.537