Literature DB >> 13677494

Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale.

Jin-shei Lai1, David Cella, Chih-Hung Chang, Rita K Bode, Allen W Heinemann.   

Abstract

Fatigue is a common symptom among cancer patients and the general population. Due to its subjective nature, fatigue has been difficult to effectively and efficiently assess. Modern computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can enable precise assessment of fatigue using a small number of items from a fatigue item bank. CAT enables brief assessment by selecting questions from an item bank that provide the maximum amount of information given a person's previous responses. This article illustrates steps to prepare such an item bank, using 13 items from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Subscale (FACIT-F) as the basis. Samples included 1022 cancer patients and 1010 people from the general population. An Item Response Theory (IRT)-based rating scale model, a polytomous extension of the Rasch dichotomous model was utilized. Nine items demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties were selected and positioned on the fatigue continuum. The fatigue levels measured by these nine items along with their response categories covered 66.8% of the general population and 82.6% of the cancer patients. Although the operational CAT algorithms to handle polytomously scored items are still in progress, we illustrated how CAT may work by using nine core items to measure level of fatigue. Using this illustration, a fatigue measure comparable to its full-length 13-item scale administration was obtained using four items. The resulting item bank can serve as a core to which will be added a psychometrically sound and operational item bank covering the entire fatigue continuum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13677494     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025014509626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  22 in total

1.  A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment.

Authors:  D Cella; C H Chang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales.

Authors:  J E Ware; J B Bjorner; M Kosinski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  1991 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.

Authors:  K H Mooney; B R Ferrell; L M Nail; S C Benedict; M R Haberman
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  1994 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.

Authors:  K M Stetz; M R Haberman; J Holcombe; L S Jones
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  Functional and metabolic consequences of sarcopenia.

Authors:  W Evans
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors.

Authors:  D Cella; K Davis; W Breitbart; G Curt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system.

Authors:  S B Yellen; D F Cella; K Webster; C Blendowski; E Kaplan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Fiatarone; E C Marks; N D Ryan; C N Meredith; L A Lipsitz; W J Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.

Authors:  E M Smets; B Garssen; B Bonke; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  49 in total

1.  Occurrences and sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in patient-reported outcome measures: Description of DIF methods, and review of measures of depression, quality of life and general health.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Jin-Shei Lai; Stephanie Silver
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2008

2.  How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: a PROMIS fatigue item bank example.

Authors:  Jin-Shei Lai; David Cella; Seung Choi; Doerte U Junghaenel; Christopher Christodoulou; Richard Gershon; Arthur Stone
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Relative precision, efficiency and construct validity of different starting and stopping rules for a computerized adaptive test: the GAIN substance problem scale.

Authors:  Barth B Riley; Kendon J Conrad; Nikolaus Bezruczko; Michael L Dennis
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2007

4.  Lifting symptom burden--how far off the ground are we?

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Jordanka Kirkova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of aerobic training in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica M Scott; Neil M Iyengar; Tormod S Nilsen; Meghan Michalski; Samantha M Thomas; James Herndon; John Sasso; Anthony Yu; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Chau T Dang; Elizabeth A Comen; Maura N Dickler; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Assessment of community functioning in people with schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses: a white paper based on an NIMH-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  Alan S Bellack; Michael F Green; Judith A Cook; Wayne Fenton; Philip D Harvey; Robert K Heaton; Thomas Laughren; Andrew C Leon; Donna J Mayo; Donald L Patrick; Thomas L Patterson; Andrew Rose; Ellen Stover; Til Wykes
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Effects of Exercise Therapy Dosing Schedule on Impaired Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jessica M Scott; Samantha M Thomas; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; James E Herndon; Pamela S Douglas; Michel G Khouri; Chau T Dang; Anthony F Yu; Diane Catalina; Cristi Ciolino; Catherine Capaci; Meghan G Michalski; Neil D Eves; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the general health questionnaire (GHQ)--12.

Authors:  Adam B Smith; Lesley J Fallowfield; Dan P Stark; Galina Velikova; Valerie Jenkins
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Linking pain items from two studies onto a common scale using item response theory.

Authors:  Wen-Hung Chen; Dennis A Revicki; Jin-Shei Lai; Karon F Cook; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Is cancer-related fatigue more strongly correlated to haematological or to psychological factors in cancer patients?

Authors:  F Romito; R Montanaro; C Corvasce; M Di Bisceglie; V Mattioli
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.