Literature DB >> 28900827

Lifetime Radiation Exposure in Patients with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis.

Mohamed A Elkoushy1, Sero Andonian2.   

Abstract

Patients presenting with nephrolithiasis often undergo repeated imaging studies before, during, and after management. Considering the significant risk of stone recurrence in primary stone-formers, repeated imaging studies are not uncommon. Cumulative effects of ionizing radiation exposure from various imaging studies could potentially increase the risk for developing cataracts and solid malignancies in urolithiasis patients. Therefore, practitioners planning or performing imaging studies with ionizing radiation are compelled to keep radiation exposure to humans and the environment as low as possible, thus strictly adhering to the ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) principles. This chapter will review the latest literature on lifetime radiation exposure of nephrolithiasis patients and present the latest recommendations in minimizing radiation exposure to them pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. For patients presenting with acute renal colic, especially those with body mass index of < 30, low-dose noncontrast computed tomography is the current gold standard of imaging. Patients with opaque stones are followed with ultrasonography (US) and plain radiography (kidney, ureter, and bladder or KUB). Intraoperatively, pulsed fluoroscopy could be used to significantly reduce radiation during ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Immediately postoperatively and in the long term, US and KUB could be used to follow up patients with nephrolithiasis. Only symptomatic patients suspected of ureteral stricture should obtain tri-phasic CT urography. Following these latest imaging guidelines from the American Urological Association will dramatically reduce lifetime radiation exposure to patients with nephrolithiasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Imaging technique; Ionizing; Kidney stones; Nephrolithiasis; Radiation exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900827     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0731-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  78 in total

1.  Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.

Authors:  Narendra Narepalem; Chandru P Sundaram; Illya C Boridy; Yan Yan; Jay P Heiken; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; F Desgrandschamps; F Terrier
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Can low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT be used for routine evaluation of suspected renal colic?

Authors:  Douglas S Katz; N Venkataramanan; Sandy Napel; F Graham Sommer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.

Authors:  Orlando Catalano; Antonio Nunziata; Francesco Altei; Alfredo Siani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Fluoro-less ureteral stent placement following uncomplicated ureteroscopic stone removal: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Damien Smith; Amy Schlaifer; Kirk Anderson; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Prospective evaluation of Doppler sonography to detect the twinkling artifact versus unenhanced computed tomography for identifying urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Ania Z Kielar; Wael Shabana; Maryam Vakili; Jonathan Rubin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Radiation doses to patients from extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Panagiotis Sandilos; Ioannis Tsalafoutas; Georgios Koutsokalis; Pantelis Karaiskos; Evangelos Georgiou; Emanouil Yakoumakis; Lampros Vlahos
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Wahib Isac; Emad Rizkala; Xiaobo Liu; Mark Noble; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  As low as reasonably achievable: Methods for reducing radiation exposure during the management of renal and ureteral stones.

Authors:  Fernando Cabrera; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01

10.  Effective radiation exposure evaluation during a one year follow-up of urolithiasis patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaynar; Erdem Tekinarslan; Suat Keskin; İbrahim Buldu; Mehmet Giray Sönmez; Tuna Karatag; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-09-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of Patient Reported Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic Treated in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Andrew C Meltzer; Pamela Katzen Burrows; Ziya Kirkali; Judd E Hollander; Michael Kurz; Patrick Mufarrij; Allan B Wolfson; Cora MacPherson; Scott Hubosky; Nataly Montano; Stephen V Jackman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Techniques - Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: How we do it.

Authors:  Darren Beiko; Hassan Razvi; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; David B Bayne; David T Tzou; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Can operator-controlled imaging reduce fluoroscopy time during flexible ureterorenoscopy?

Authors:  Michaël M E L Henderickx; Tim Brits; Natalia S Zabegalina; Joyce Baard; Mansour Ballout; Harrie P Beerlage; Stefan De Wachter; Guido M Kamphuis
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2022-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.