Literature DB >> 26054297

Interpreting physicochemical experimental data sets.

Nicola Colclough1, Mark C Wenlock2.   

Abstract

With the wealth of experimental physicochemical data available to chemoinformaticians from the literature, commercial, and company databases an increasing challenge is the interpretation of such datasets. Subtle differences in experimental methodology used to generate these datasets can give rise to variations in physicochemical property values. Such methodology nuances will be apparent to an expert experimentalist but not necessarily to the data analyst and modeller. This paper describes the differences between common methodologies for measuring the four most important physicochemical properties namely aqueous solubility, octan-1-ol/water distribution coefficient, pK(a) and plasma protein binding highlighting key factors that can lead to systematic differences. Insight is given into how to identify datasets suitable for combining.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aqueous solubility; Data curation; Experimental differences; Lipophilicity; Physicochemical properties; Plasma protein binding; QSA(P)R modelling; pK a

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26054297     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9850-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  70 in total

Review 1.  High-performance affinity chromatography and immobilized serum albumin as probes for drug- and hormone-protein binding.

Authors:  D S Hage; J Austin
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  2000-02-28

Review 2.  In silico ADME/Tox: why models fail.

Authors:  Terry R Stouch; James R Kenyon; Stephen R Johnson; Xue-Qing Chen; Arthur Doweyko; Yi Li
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Validation and long-term assessment of an approach for the high throughput determination of lipophilicity (log POW) values using multiplexed, absorbance-based capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Kit-Sum Wong; Jeremy Kenseth; Roy Strasburg
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 4.  Bridging solubility between drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Li Di; Paul V Fish; Takashi Mano
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 7.851

5.  A system for LogD screening of 96-well plates using a water-plug aspiration/injection method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yukifumi Dohta; Taro Yamashita; Satomi Horiike; Tatsuji Nakamura; Takehiro Fukami
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Multiwavelength spectrophotometric determination of acid dissociation constants of ionizable drugs.

Authors:  R I Allen; K J Box; J E Comer; C Peake; K Y Tam
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  A method for measuring the lipophilicity of compounds in mixtures of 10.

Authors:  Mark C Wenlock; Tim Potter; Patrick Barton; Rupert P Austin
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2011-02-22

8.  Microscale determination of dissociation constants of multivalent pharmaceuticals by capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Y Ishihama; Y Oda; N Asakawa
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Errors in estimating the unbound fraction of drugs due to the volume shift in equilibrium dialysis.

Authors:  J D Huang
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Investigations of the effects of ethanol on warfarin binding to human serum albumin.

Authors:  C E Ha; C E Petersen; D S Park; K Harohalli; N V Bhagavan
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.