Literature DB >> 2605302

Calculations of scattered light from rigid polymers by Shifrin and Rayleigh-Debye approximations.

M F Bishop1.   

Abstract

We show that the commonly used Rayleigh-Debye method for calculating light scattering can lead to significant errors when used for describing scattering from dilute solutions of long rigid polymers, errors that can be overcome by use of the easily applied Shifrin approximation. In order to show the extent of the discrepancies between the two methods, we have performed calculations at normal incidence both for polarized and unpolarized incident light with the scattering intensity determined as a function of polarization angle and of scattering angle, assuming that the incident light is in a spectral region where the absorption of hemoglobin is small. When the Shifrin method is used, the calculated intensities using either polarized or unpolarized scattered light give information about the alignment of polymers, a feature that is lost in the Rayleigh-Debye approximation because the effect of the asymmetric shape of the scatterer on the incoming polarized electric field is ignored. Using sickle hemoglobin polymers as an example, we have calculated the intensity of light scattering using both approaches and found that, for totally aligned polymers within parallel planes, the difference can be as large as 25%, when the incident electric field is perpendicular to the polymers, for near forward or near backward scattering (0 degrees or 180 degrees scattering angle), but becomes zero as the scattering angle approaches 90 degrees. For randomly oriented polymers within a plane, or for incident unpolarized light for either totally oriented or randomly oriented polymers, the difference between the two results for near forward or near backward scattering is approximately 15%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2605302      PMCID: PMC1280590          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82737-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization. III. Nucleation rates determined from stochastic fluctuations in polymerization progress curves.

Authors:  J Hofrichter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Exponential progress curves and shear in the gelation of hemoglobin S.

Authors:  R W Briehl; G W Christoph
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1987

3.  Polymer domains, gelation models and sickle cell crises.

Authors:  F A Ferrone; S Basak; A J Martino; H X Zhou
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1987

4.  The transparency of the mammalian cornea.

Authors:  J L Cox; R A Farrell; R W Hart; M E Langham
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Hemoglobin S gelation and sickle cell disease.

Authors:  W A Eaton; J Hofrichter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth.

Authors:  T Mitchison; M Kirschner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Nov 15-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization. I. Studies using temperature-jump and laser photolysis techniques.

Authors:  F A Ferrone; J Hofrichter; W A Eaton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The relationship between morphology and transparency in the nonswelling corneal stroma of the shark.

Authors:  J N Goldman; G B Benedek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-12

9.  Quasi-elastic laser light scattering from solutions and gels of hemoglobin S.

Authors:  Z Kam; J Hofrichter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization. II. A double nucleation mechanism.

Authors:  F A Ferrone; J Hofrichter; W A Eaton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nanostructure of the fibrin clot.

Authors:  C Yeromonahos; B Polack; F Caton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Measurement of amyloid formation by turbidity assay-seeing through the cloud.

Authors:  Ran Zhao; Masatomo So; Hendrik Maat; Nicholas J Ray; Fumio Arisaka; Yuji Goto; John A Carver; Damien Hall
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-11-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.