| Literature DB >> 26052332 |
Shallu Thakur1, Pankaj K Singh2, Alok Das2, R Rathour3, M Variar4, S K Prashanthi5, A K Singh6, U D Singh6, Duni Chand7, N K Singh2, Tilak R Sharma2.
Abstract
Rice blast resistant gene, Pi54 cloned from rice line, Tetep, is effective against diverse isolates of Magnaporthe oryzae. In this study, we prospected the allelic variants of the dominant blast resistance gene from a set of 92 rice lines to determine the nucleotide diversity, pattern of its molecular evolution, phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary dynamics, and to develop allele specific markers. High quality sequences were generated for homologs of Pi54 gene. Using comparative sequence analysis, InDels of variable sizes in all the alleles were observed. Profiling of the selected sites of SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) and amino acids (N sites ≥ 10) exhibited constant frequency distribution of mutational and substitutional sites between the resistance and susceptible rice lines, respectively. A total of 50 new haplotypes based on the nucleotide polymorphism was also identified. A unique haplotype (H_3) was found to be linked to all the resistant alleles isolated from indica rice lines. Unique leucine zipper and tyrosine sulfation sites were identified in the predicted Pi54 proteins. Selection signals were observed in entire coding sequence of resistance alleles, as compared to LRR domains for susceptible alleles. This is a maiden report of extensive variability of Pi54 alleles in different landraces and cultivated varieties, possibly, attributing broad-spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae. The sequence variation in two consensus region: 163 and 144 bp were used for the development of allele specific DNA markers. Validated markers can be used for the selection and identification of better allele(s) and their introgression in commercial rice cultivars employing marker assisted selection.Entities:
Keywords: Pi54; allele mining; allele specific markers; blast resistance genes; polymorphism; rice landraces
Year: 2015 PMID: 26052332 PMCID: PMC4440361 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1PCR amplification of different fragments of . bp- Base pairs, M- Molecular weight marker and lanes 1–3, PCR fragments obtained from overlapping fragments of Pi-54 allele.
Different groups and rice accessions used in mining for blast resistance gene .
| Cultivar | 48 | |
| 3 | ||
| Landrace | 32 | |
| 3 | ||
| 2 | ||
| Breeding line | 2 | |
| Hybrid | 1 | |
| Unknown | 1 |
Figure 2The number of amino acid substitutions in the predicted 64 Pi54 protein. (A) Distribution of amino acid substitutions across 64 predicted proteins. (B) Substitutional profile of amino acids of disease resistant and susceptible phenotype.
Nucleotide polymorphism of the .
| All | Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 198 | 0.0226 | 0.00146 | 0.02972 | 0.00801 | −1.07559 | <1 |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 163 | 0.02541 | 0.0018 | 0.03289 | 0.00893 | −1.03898 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 15 | 0.01073 | 0.00218 | 0.0235 | 0.00847 | >1 | ||
| Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 179 | 0.02245 | 0.00131 | 0.02717 | 0.00753 | −0.87382 | <1 | |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 140 | 0.02431 | 0.00149 | 0.029 | 0.00811 | −0.86041 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 9 | 0.00839 | 0.00123 | 0.01451 | 0.00607 | −1.34456 | >1 | |
| Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 77 | 0.0238 | 0.00487 | 0.02285 | 0.01094 | −0.06202 | <1 | |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 68 | 0.02899 | 0.00632 | 0.02815 | 0.01352 | −0.08869 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 9 | 0.02815 | 0.01044 | 0.0292 | 0.01615 | −0.21398 | >1 | |
| Cultivar | Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 123 | 0.02254 | 0.00144 | 0.02102 | 0.00646 | −0.08589 | <1 |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 106 | 0.02576 | 0.00176 | 0.02431 | 0.00752 | −0.14919 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 7 | 0.00883 | 0.00153 | 0.01259 | 0.00587 | −1.13434 | >1 | |
| Landrace | Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 225 | 0.03417 | 0.00467 | 0.03877 | 0.01246 | −0.94232 | <1 |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 141 | 0.02451 | 0.00371 | 0.03502 | 0.01139 | −1.36704 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 13 | 0.01247 | 0.00461 | 0.02524 | 0.01036 | >1 | ||
| Disease resistance phenotypes | Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 192 | 0.0237 | 0.00171 | 0.03004 | 0.00848 | −0.9818 | <1 |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 158 | 0.0267 | 0.00215 | 0.03366 | 0.00957 | −0.96141 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 15 | 0.01213 | 0.00267 | 0.02481 | 0.00917 | >1 | ||
| Disease susceptible phenotypes | Whole sequence | [1–4194] | 87 | 0.0208 | 0.00286 | 0.01916 | 0.00728 | 0.27313 | <1 |
| CDS | [1338–3585] | 71 | 0.02208 | 0.00327 | 0.02104 | 0.00806 | 0.15424 | <1 | |
| LRR | [3324–3462] | 3 | 0.0057 | 0.00174 | 0.00699 | 0.00454 | −0.56505 | >1 |
S, Number of Polymorphic or Segregating sites; π, Nucleotide diversity; Θ, Watterson's nucleotide diversity estimator based on silent sites. Tajima's D calculation based on the difference between the number of segregating sites and the average number of nucleotide differences. Jukes–Cantor (JC) corrected synonymous differences per synonymous site (Ks) and non-synonymous differences per non-synonymous site (Ka). For Tajima's D, no value is significant at 0.10 level (P > 0.10) and 0.10 > P > 0.05 (for bold).
Figure 3Sliding window analysis of nucleotide diversity (π) in the LRR domains of 92 . The different groups from where the alleles were mined are given above in the Figure. The nucleotide diversity (π) was plotted on Y-axis and the X-axis represents the positions of nucleotides.
Figure 4Phylogenetic analysis of . (A) Phylogenetic tree of Pi54 alleles based on the nucleotide sequences of 92 rice accessions. (B) Phylogenetic tree of Pi54 alleles based on the nucleotide sequences of 20 blast susceptible rice accession. (C) Phylogenetic tree of Pi54 alleles based on the nucleotide sequences of 72 blast resistant accessions. N-J method was used for the construction of tree. No definite clustering was obtained in all the trees.
Figure 5A haplotype network based on potential SNPs of the 92 . Each group of haplotypes is shown as a solid circle, and five major haplotypes are marked in larger circles. Each branch represents a single mutational step. Branches with small solid circles indicate that there is more than a single mutational step between haplotypes. Different sizes of circles represent the different numbers of each haplotype.
Summary statistics of haplotype diversity in .
| All | 50 | 0.935 | 0.00027/0.016 |
| Disease resistance phenotypes | 41 | 0.935 | 0.00036/0.019 |
| Disease susceptible phenotypes | 14 | 0.958 | 0.00079/0.028 |
Hn, Number of Haplotypes; Hd, Haplotype diversity; V(Hd), Variance of Haplotype diversity; SD, Standard deviation of Haplotype diversity.
Figure 6The number of amino acid substitutions in the predicted 64 Pi54 protein. (A) Distribution of amino acid substitutions across 64 predicted proteins. (B) Substitutional profile of amino acids of disease resistant and susceptible phenotype.
Figure 7PCR amplification of rice lines with the dominant and co-dominant PCR marker. (A) PCR amplification with the dominant marker (D163_F and D163_R) in 18 rice lines. Lanes 1–9: presence of band in rice lines (Acharmati, Aditya, Ananda, Beesginsali, Bidarlocal-2, Dhanaprasad, Gautam, Himdhan, and Pusa sugandh 5); lanes 10–18: absence of band in rice lines.(HR-12, TP-309, Co-39, Nipponbare, Shiva, Satti, Pusa basmati-1, Ram Jawain-100, and Sathia-2) (B) PCR amplification with the co-dominant marker (C144_F and C144_R) in 26 rice lines. bp- base pair; M- 100 bp molecular marker. Lanes 1–10: presence of susceptible band (CO-39, HR-12, CT-10006-7-2M-5-1P3M, Jyoti, Kavali kannu, Mesebatta, Nipponbare, Samba mahsuri, Shiva, Taipei-309); lanes 11–18: presence of resistant band (Tetep, Budda, Chiti zhini, CSR 10, Gonrra bhog, Himalya 799, Pusa Sugandh 3, Ranbir basmati, Sadabahar); lanes 19–25: presence of both the bands (Belgaum basmati, CSR-60, HLR-142, Indrayani, IRAT-144, Kariya).
List of rice accessions distinguishable based on dominant marker.
| Acharmati | Pusa sugandh 5 | Mesebatta |
| Aditya | Salumpikit | HR-12 |
| Ananda | Samleshwari | TP-309 |
| Beesginsali | Siddasala | Co-39 |
| Bidarlocal-2 | V L Dhan 21 | Nipponbare |
| Dhanaprasad | Vasanesanna batta | Shiva |
| Gautam | Vikash | Satti |
| Himdhan | Virendra | Pusa basmati-1 |
| IRBB-4 | Ram Jawain-100 | |
| IRBLB-BIRBLB-5-M | Sathia-2 | |
| Kala Dhan | Lalan kanda | |
| Kulanji pille | Superbasmati | |
| Mingola | Parijat | |
| Mysore mallige | Malviya dhan | |
| T23 | ||
List of rice accessions distinguishable based on co-dominant marker.
| Budda | Mahamaya | CO-39 | Belgaum basmati |
| Chiti zhini | MTU-1061 | CT-10006-7-2M-5-1P3M | CSR-60 |
| CSR 10 | Pant sankar dhan 1 | HR-12 | HLR-142 |
| Gonrra bhog | Pant sugandh dhan 17 | Jyoti | Indrayani |
| Himalya 799 | Tetep | Kavali kannu | IRAT-144 |
| HLR-108 | Pusa Sugandh 3 | Mesebatta | Kariya |
| HLR-144 | Ranbir basmati | Nipponbare | Orugallu |
| HPR 2083 | Sadabahar | Samba mahsuri | Parimala kalvi |
| HPR-2178 | Suphala | Shiva | |
| Indira sona | Thule atte | Taipei-309 | |
| IRBB 55 | Tilak chandan | ||
| IRBB-13 | Tiyun | ||
| IRBB-4 | Varalu | ||
| Kari kantiga | Varun dhan | ||