| Literature DB >> 26052225 |
Ivan Batalov1, Adam W Feinberg2.
Abstract
Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are a promising cell source for cardiac tissue engineering and cell-based therapies for heart repair because they can be expanded in vitro and differentiated into most cardiovascular cell types, including cardiomyocytes. During embryonic heart development, this differentiation occurs under the influence of internal and external stimuli that guide cells to go down the cardiac lineage. In order to differentiate PSCs in vitro, these or similar stimuli need to be provided in a controlled manner. However, because it is not possible to completely recapitulate the embryonic environment, the factors essential for cardiac differentiation of PSCs in vitro need to be experimentally determined and validated. Since PSCs were first developed, significant progress has been made in optimizing techniques for their differentiation toward cardiomyocytes. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in these techniques, with particular focus on monolayer-based methods that have improved the efficiency and scalability of cardiomyocyte differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: cardiomyocytes; differentiation; embryonic stem cells; induced pluripotent stem cells; review
Year: 2015 PMID: 26052225 PMCID: PMC4447149 DOI: 10.4137/BMI.S20050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Insights ISSN: 1177-2719
Figure 1Timelines of PSC monolayer-based differentiation methods. Culture conditions are shown in the left column and differentiation efficiency in the right column. Timelines show information about media used for differentiation (below time axis) and the additional components added to it (above time axis). Information about inhibitors used in each method can be found in Table 1. The last time mark indicates the beginning of spontaneous contractions of the derived cardiomyocytes.
Comparison of PSC monolayer-based methods used for cardiomyocyte differentiation.
| DIFFERENTIATION METHOD | PSC EXPANSION MEDIUM | SUBSTRATE MATRIX | DIFFERENTIATION MEDIUM | ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS | HUMAN ESC LINES TESTED | HUMAN iPSC LINES TESTED | CHEMICALLY DEFINED | XENO-FREE | ALL COMPONENTS OPTIMIZED |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laflamme et al (2007) | MEF-conditioned medium | Matrigel | RPMI 1640 + B27 | Activin A, BMP4 | 1 | 0 | − | − | − |
| Lian et al (2012) #1 | mTeSR1 | Matrigel | RPMI 1640 + B27 (w/o insulin for the first 7 days) | CHIR99021 (GSK-inhibitor), Activin A, BMP4 | 3 | 3 | + | − | − |
| Lian et al (2012) #2 | mTeSR1 | Matrigel | RPMI 1640 + B27 (w/o insulin for the first 7 days) | CHIR99021 (GSK-inhibitor), IWP-2 or IWP-4 (Wnt-inhibitors) | 3 | 3 | + | − | − |
| Cao et al (2013) | mTeSR1 | Matrigel | CVPC induction medium (CIM), Cardiomyocyte differentiation medium 1 and 2 (CDM1 and CDM2) | Ascorbic acid, BMP4, CHIR99021 (GSK-inhibitor), dorsomorphin (BMP-inhibitor), A83–01 (activin/nodal inhibitor), IWR1 (Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibitor) | 2 | 1 | + | − | − |
| Burridge et al (2014) | E8 | Matrigel, laminin, or vitronectin | CDM3: RPMI 1640 + albumin + L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate | CHIR99021 (GSK3-inhibitor), Wnt-C59 (Wnt-inhibitor) | 2 | 11 | + | + | + |