Natalie Hood1, Julie Considine2. 1. Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health Surf Life Saving Australia Representative, Australian Resuscitation Council, Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3125, Australia. Electronic address: natalie.hood@monashhealth.org. 2. Eastern Health - Deakin University Nursing Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University College of Emergency Nursing Australasia Representative, Australian Resuscitation Council, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Electronic address: julie.considine@deakin.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilisation has been a mainstay of trauma care for decades and is based on the premise that immobilisation will prevent further neurological compromise in patients with a spinal column injury. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence related to spinal immobilisation in pre-hospital and emergency care settings. METHODS: In February 2015, we performed a systematic literature review of English language publications from 1966 to January 2015 indexed in MEDLINE and Cochrane library using the following search terms: 'spinal injuries' OR 'spinal cord injuries' AND 'emergency treatment' OR 'emergency care' OR 'first aid' AND immobilisation. EMBASE was searched for keywords 'spinal injury OR 'spinal cord injury' OR 'spine fracture AND 'emergency care' OR 'prehospital care'. RESULTS: There were 47 studies meeting inclusion criteria for further review. Ten studies were case series (level of evidence IV) and there were 37 studies from which data were extrapolated from healthy volunteers, cadavers or multiple trauma patients. There were 15 studies that were supportive, 13 studies that were neutral, and 19 studies opposing spinal immobilisation. CONCLUSION: There are no published high-level studies that assess the efficacy of spinal immobilisation in pre-hospital and emergency care settings. Almost all of the current evidence is related to spinal immobilisation is extrapolated data, mostly from healthy volunteers.
BACKGROUND: Spinal immobilisation has been a mainstay of trauma care for decades and is based on the premise that immobilisation will prevent further neurological compromise in patients with a spinal column injury. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence related to spinal immobilisation in pre-hospital and emergency care settings. METHODS: In February 2015, we performed a systematic literature review of English language publications from 1966 to January 2015 indexed in MEDLINE and Cochrane library using the following search terms: 'spinal injuries' OR 'spinal cord injuries' AND 'emergency treatment' OR 'emergency care' OR 'first aid' AND immobilisation. EMBASE was searched for keywords 'spinal injury OR 'spinal cord injury' OR 'spine fracture AND 'emergency care' OR 'prehospital care'. RESULTS: There were 47 studies meeting inclusion criteria for further review. Ten studies were case series (level of evidence IV) and there were 37 studies from which data were extrapolated from healthy volunteers, cadavers or multiple traumapatients. There were 15 studies that were supportive, 13 studies that were neutral, and 19 studies opposing spinal immobilisation. CONCLUSION: There are no published high-level studies that assess the efficacy of spinal immobilisation in pre-hospital and emergency care settings. Almost all of the current evidence is related to spinal immobilisation is extrapolated data, mostly from healthy volunteers.
Authors: Philip C Nolte; Davut D Uzun; Shiyao Liao; Matthias Kuch; Paul A Grützner; Matthias Münzberg; Michael Kreinest Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: J G Ten Brinke; W K Gebbink; L Pallada; T P Saltzherr; M Hogervorst; J C Goslings Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2017-08-05 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Roessler Ms; M Riffelmann; N Kunze-Szikszay; M Lier; O Schmid; H Haus; S Schneider; Heuer Jf Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Matthias K Jung; Gregor V R von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt; Holger Keil; Paul A Grützner; Niko R E Schneider; Michael Kreinest Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michael Kreinest; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Svenja Schüler; Paul A Grützner; Matthias Münzberg Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 2.953