Literature DB >> 31768566

[Development and first application testing of a new protocol for preclinical spinal immobilization in children : Assessment of indications based on the E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric].

Philip C Nolte1, Davut D Uzun1, Shiyao Liao1,2, Matthias Kuch3, Paul A Grützner1, Matthias Münzberg1, Michael Kreinest4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To protect the spine from secondary damage, spinal immobilization is a standard procedure in prehospital trauma management. Immobilization protocols aim to support emergency medicine personnel in quick decision making but predominantly focus on the adult spine; however, trauma mechanisms and injury patterns in adults differ from those in children and applying adult prehospital immobilization protocols to pediatric patients may be insufficient. Adequate protocols for children with spinal injuries are currently unavailable.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was (i) to develop a protocol that supports decision making for prehospital spinal immobilization in pediatric trauma patients based on evidence from current scientific literature and (ii) to perform a first analysis of the quality of results if the protocol is used by emergency personnel.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a structured literature search a new immobilization protocol was developed. Analysis of the quality of results was performed by a questionnaire containing four case scenarios in order to assess correct decision making. The decision about spinal immobilization was made without and with the utilization of the protocol.
RESULTS: The E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric was developed based on the literature. The analysis of the quality of results was performed involving 39 emergency medicine providers. It could be shown that if the E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric was used, the correct type of immobilization was chosen more frequently. A total of 38 out of 39 participants evaluated the protocol as helpful.
CONCLUSION: The E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric provides decision-making support whether pediatric spine immobilization is indicated with respect to the cardiopulmonary status of the patient. In a first analysis, the E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric improves decision making by emergency medical care providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency medicine; Immobilization; Pediatric; Prehospital; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31768566     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-019-00744-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  93 in total

1.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 6. Paediatric life support.

Authors:  Ian K Maconochie; Robert Bingham; Christoph Eich; Jesús López-Herce; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Thomas Rajka; Patrick Van de Voorde; David A Zideman; Dominique Biarent
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  Sports-related injury of the pediatric spine.

Authors:  Bradley A Maxfield
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Evaluation of pediatric cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  C Baker; H Kadish; J E Schunk
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  External fixation and surgical fusion for pediatric cervical spine injuries: Short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Taylor E Purvis; Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Nancy Abu-Bonsrah; C Rory Goodwin; Mari L Groves; Michael C Ain; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Cervical spine clearance after trauma in children.

Authors:  Richard C E Anderson; Eric R Scaife; Stephen J Fenton; Peter Kan; Kris W Hansen; Douglas L Brockmeyer
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Pathophysiology and Management of Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children.

Authors:  Kristin Guilliams; Mark S Wainwright
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 1.987

7.  The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment.

Authors:  Glen Bandiera; Ian G Stiell; George A Wells; Catherine Clement; Valerie De Maio; Katherine L Vandemheen; Gary H Greenberg; Howard Lesiuk; Robert Brison; Daniel Cass; Jonathan Dreyer; Mary A Eisenhauer; Iain Macphail; R Douglas McKnight; Laurie Morrison; Mark Reardon; Michael Schull; James Worthington
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Detection of pediatric cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Hugh J L Garton; Matthew R Hammer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Epidemiology and prevention of childhood injuries.

Authors:  M Denise Dowd; Heather T Keenan; Susan L Bratton
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers.

Authors:  Michael Kreinest; Sarah Goller; Geraldine Rauch; Christian Frank; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Christoph G Wölfl; Stefan Matschke; Matthias Münzberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.