Literature DB >> 26046924

Empirical gradient threshold technique for automated segmentation across image modalities and cell lines.

J Chalfoun1, M Majurski1, A Peskin1, C Breen2, P Bajcsy1, M Brady1.   

Abstract

New microscopy technologies are enabling image acquisition of terabyte-sized data sets consisting of hundreds of thousands of images. In order to retrieve and analyze the biological information in these large data sets, segmentation is needed to detect the regions containing cells or cell colonies. Our work with hundreds of large images (each 21,000×21,000 pixels) requires a segmentation method that: (1) yields high segmentation accuracy, (2) is applicable to multiple cell lines with various densities of cells and cell colonies, and several imaging modalities, (3) can process large data sets in a timely manner, (4) has a low memory footprint and (5) has a small number of user-set parameters that do not require adjustment during the segmentation of large image sets. None of the currently available segmentation methods meet all these requirements. Segmentation based on image gradient thresholding is fast and has a low memory footprint. However, existing techniques that automate the selection of the gradient image threshold do not work across image modalities, multiple cell lines, and a wide range of foreground/background densities (requirement 2) and all failed the requirement for robust parameters that do not require re-adjustment with time (requirement 5). We present a novel and empirically derived image gradient threshold selection method for separating foreground and background pixels in an image that meets all the requirements listed above. We quantify the difference between our approach and existing ones in terms of accuracy, execution speed, memory usage and number of adjustable parameters on a reference data set. This reference data set consists of 501 validation images with manually determined segmentations and image sizes ranging from 0.36 Megapixels to 850 Megapixels. It includes four different cell lines and two image modalities: phase contrast and fluorescent. Our new technique, called Empirical Gradient Threshold (EGT), is derived from this reference data set with a 10-fold cross-validation method. EGT segments cells or colonies with resulting Dice accuracy index measurements above 0.92 for all cross-validation data sets. EGT results has also been visually verified on a much larger data set that includes bright field and Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) images, 16 cell lines and 61 time-sequence data sets, for a total of 17,479 images. This method is implemented as an open-source plugin to ImageJ as well as a standalone executable that can be downloaded from the following link: https://isg.nist.gov/.
© 2015 The Authors Journal of Microscopy © 2015 Royal Microscopical Society.

Keywords:  EGT; empirical model; open-source; robustness; scalability; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26046924     DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  13 in total

1.  From Image Tiles to Web-Based Interactive Measurements in One Stop.

Authors:  Antoine Vandecreme; Michael Majurski; Joe Chalfoun; Keana Scott; John Henry J Scott; Mary Brady; Peter Bajcsy
Journal:  Micros Today       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  DeepPhagy: a deep learning framework for quantitatively measuring autophagy activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Yubin Xie; Wenzhong Liu; Wankun Deng; Di Peng; Chenwei Wang; Haodong Xu; Chen Ruan; Yongjie Deng; Yaping Guo; Chenjun Lu; Cong Yi; Jian Ren; Yu Xue
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 16.016

3.  Quantifying Intracellular Particle Flows by DIC Object Tracking.

Authors:  Anushree R Chaphalkar; Yash K Jawale; Dhruv Khatri; Chaitanya A Athale
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  FogBank: a single cell segmentation across multiple cell lines and image modalities.

Authors:  Joe Chalfoun; Michael Majurski; Alden Dima; Christina Stuelten; Adele Peskin; Mary Brady
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Survey statistics of automated segmentations applied to optical imaging of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Peter Bajcsy; Antonio Cardone; Joe Chalfoun; Michael Halter; Derek Juba; Marcin Kociolek; Michael Majurski; Adele Peskin; Carl Simon; Mylene Simon; Antoine Vandecreme; Mary Brady
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments.

Authors:  David A Van Valen; Takamasa Kudo; Keara M Lane; Derek N Macklin; Nicolas T Quach; Mialy M DeFelice; Inbal Maayan; Yu Tanouchi; Euan A Ashley; Markus W Covert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Lineage mapper: A versatile cell and particle tracker.

Authors:  Joe Chalfoun; Michael Majurski; Alden Dima; Michael Halter; Kiran Bhadriraju; Mary Brady
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Pluri-IQ: Quantification of Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency through an Image-Based Analysis Software.

Authors:  Tânia Perestrelo; Weitong Chen; Marcelo Correia; Christopher Le; Sandro Pereira; Ana S Rodrigues; Maria I Sousa; João Ramalho-Santos; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 7.765

9.  A Novel Method for Effective Cell Segmentation and Tracking in Phase Contrast Microscopic Images.

Authors:  Hongju Jo; Junghun Han; Yoon Suk Kim; Yongheum Lee; Sejung Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Practical application of microsphere samples for benchmarking a quantitative phase imaging system.

Authors:  Edward Kwee; Alexander Peterson; Michael Halter; John Elliott
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 4.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.