Radana Gurecká1, Ivana Koborová1, Jozef Šebek2, Katarína Šebeková1. 1. Institute of Molecular BioMedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia. 2. Institute of Technology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In adults, microalbuminuria indicates generalized endothelial dysfunction, and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and all cause mortality. Slovak adults present one of the highest cardiovascular mortality rates in Europe. Thus Slovak adolescents are on a high-risk to develop cardiovascular afflictions early, and screening for microalbuminuria might be useful in early assessment of their cardiovascular risk. We aimed to study the prevalence of microalbuminuria in Slovak adolescents, and the association of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) to cardiovascular risk factors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Anthropometric data, blood pressure, blood count, glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, renal function, inflammatory status, concentrations of homocysteine and uric acid were determined and associated with ACR in 2 666 adolescents (49.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged 14-to-20 years. Microalbuminuria was classified as ACR 2.5-25.0 mg/mmol in boys and 3.5-35.0 mg/mmol in girls. RESULTS: Prevalence of microalbuminuria in both genders reached 3.3%, and did not differ significantly between lean and centrally obese subjects. Girls presented higher ACR than boys (normoalbuminuric: 0.6 ± 0.5 mg/mmol vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 mg/mmol, p > 0.001; microalbuminuric: 9.3 ± 7.3 mg/mmol vs. 5.0 ± 3.8 mg/mmol; p > 0.001). Microalbuminuric adolescents and those presenting normoalbuminuria within the upper ACR quartile were slimmer than their normoalbuminuric counterparts or adolescents with normoalbuminuria within the lower quartile, respectively. No association between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk markers was revealed. CONCLUSION: Results obtained in this study do not support our assumption that ACR associates with cardiometabolic risk factors in apparently healthy adolescents. Follow-up studies until adulthood are needed to estimate the potential cardiometabolic risk of apparently healthy microalbuminuric adolescents.
INTRODUCTION: In adults, microalbuminuria indicates generalized endothelial dysfunction, and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and all cause mortality. Slovak adults present one of the highest cardiovascular mortality rates in Europe. Thus Slovak adolescents are on a high-risk to develop cardiovascular afflictions early, and screening for microalbuminuria might be useful in early assessment of their cardiovascular risk. We aimed to study the prevalence of microalbuminuria in Slovak adolescents, and the association of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) to cardiovascular risk factors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Anthropometric data, blood pressure, blood count, glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, renal function, inflammatory status, concentrations of homocysteine and uric acid were determined and associated with ACR in 2 666 adolescents (49.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged 14-to-20 years. Microalbuminuria was classified as ACR 2.5-25.0 mg/mmol in boys and 3.5-35.0 mg/mmol in girls. RESULTS: Prevalence of microalbuminuria in both genders reached 3.3%, and did not differ significantly between lean and centrally obese subjects. Girls presented higher ACR than boys (normoalbuminuric: 0.6 ± 0.5 mg/mmol vs. 0.5 ± 0.4 mg/mmol, p > 0.001; microalbuminuric: 9.3 ± 7.3 mg/mmol vs. 5.0 ± 3.8 mg/mmol; p > 0.001). Microalbuminuric adolescents and those presenting normoalbuminuria within the upper ACR quartile were slimmer than their normoalbuminuric counterparts or adolescents with normoalbuminuria within the lower quartile, respectively. No association between microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk markers was revealed. CONCLUSION: Results obtained in this study do not support our assumption that ACR associates with cardiometabolic risk factors in apparently healthy adolescents. Follow-up studies until adulthood are needed to estimate the potential cardiometabolic risk of apparently healthy microalbuminuric adolescents.
Glomerular capillaries generally conserve 99.9% of proteins, thus increased urinary
albumin excretion (UAE) rate reflects injury to both renal and systemic vascular beds
and indicates generalized endothelial dysfunction [1, 2].
The term microalbuminuria (MA) indicates the presence of a small amount of albumin (a
concentration below the detection threshold of a standard urine dipstick test) in the
urine.In adults MA indicates either presence of renal or cardiovascular (CV) disease or an
enhanced risk for their development [3-7]; and is
considered the first clinical sign of obesity-associated nephropathy, particularly in
the presence of hypertension [8].Prevalence of MA in general population of adolescents reaches 4%-to-16% [9-15], thus is higher than in
normotensive non-diabetic adults, ranging between 3%-to-8% [7, 16, 17]. However, healthy lean adolescents present, paradoxically, significantly
higher prevalence of MA than their overweight and obese counterparts [10, 12, 14,
15, 18–21]. Unlike in adults, in
adolescents correlation between MA and cardiovascular risk factors has not been clearly
proved yet. Only two studies reported a significant association between MA and CV risk
factors in apparently healthy adolescents: Rademacher et al. [22] revealed a positive relationship
between UAE rate and fasting insulin; while in black males (but white males and black or
white females) UAE rate correlated directly with systolic blood pressure [23]. In a large study of Nguyen et
al. [10], MA was associated with
impaired fasting glucose, insulin resistance, and hypertension only in overweight
adolescents.Prevalence of overweight and obesity is alarmingly increasing among Slovak youth [24]. The onset of obesity in
childhood and adolescence may manifest in consequences such as hypertension, insulin
resistance, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other diseases already in
youth, and increases the likelihood of premature cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality
in adulthood [25-27]. Among EU-27 countries Slovakia
holds the 5th top position in standardized death rate from CV and the
2nd highest position in that from ischemic heart disease [28, 29]. Thus, Slovak adolescents are on high risk to develop CV
disease.We hypothesize that if MA is an indicator of early vascular damage in the adolescents,
ACR should associate with cardiometabolic risk factors. Considering the obesechildren
at particularly high risk of CV outcomes, we aim to study whether central obesity
modifies the association between ACR and cardiometabolic risk factors. The prevalence of
MA (determined as ACR in the first voided morning sample), and the associations of ACR
to cardiometabolic risk factors (anthropometric characteristics, blood pressure values,
biomarkers reflecting glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, renal function, low grade
inflammation; uric acid and homocysteine) was assessed in 2 666 apparently healthy
adolescents. We used principal component analysis for statistical evaluation, assuming
that multivariate analysis dealing with dummy variables representing an eigenvector in
multidimensional space for each individual studied could reveal associations not
discovered in standard multivariate approaches handling series of variables per
se in parallel.
Subjects and methods
The “Respect for Health” study has been launched in 2011 in cooperation of
two local health authorities—Department of Health of Bratislava Self-governing
Region and the Regional Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic in Bratislava.
This cross-sectional study aims to characterize cardiometabolic health status of
students attending state-governed secondary schools in Bratislava region and to
establish an effective preventive program for early cardio- and nephro-protective
regimens. Data were collected from November 2011 to December 2012: anthropometric and
blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed directly at high schools by educated,
trained staff; blood and urine analyses in a central laboratory.Decision to participate was on a voluntary basis. A signed informed consent was obtained
from the adult participants. The minors provided verbal assent, and an informed consent
signed by their parents/guardians. Study was conducted according to the Declaration of
Helsinki, after the approval of the protocol by the Ethics Committee of Bratislava
Self-Governing Region.
Subjects
In school-year 2011/2012, 19 172 students were enrolled in high schools in Bratislava
region. Four thousand four hundred (22.9%) adolescents aged 12-to-23 years underwent
anthropometric measurements. From among them 2 960 (67.3%) provided blood and urine
samples. After exclusion of students aged <14 years (in whom Tanner stage
significantly and independently affects UAE rate [12]); those aged >20 years (due to small number, and
considerable prevalence of boys) (n = 30); subjects of non-Middle European descent (n
= 28), and those in whom complete blood and urine analyses data were not available (n
= 224), subjects presenting fasting serum glucose ≥6.9 mmol/l (n = 7,
albuminuria in them might have reflected diabetic nephropathy), and those with ACR in
proteinuric range (n = 5, albuminuria might have reflected primary renal disease);
data from 2 666 adolescents (49.4% boys, 51.6% girls) aged 14-to-20-years were
available for final evaluation. This accounts for 90.1% of students who underwent
anthropometric measurements and provided biological material. A representative sample
for 14-to-20-year-old enrolled students, with 95% confidence interval and 80% power,
was calculated as 1250 boys and 1260 girls.
Measurements
Anthropometric measurements were performed directly at high schools by trained
working groups comprising students from Slovak Medical University, supervised by PhD
students from Slovak Medical University and Comenius University, or employees of the
Regional Public Health Authority. Waist circumference was taken with the subjects
standing upright, with relaxed shoulders and facing the investigator, with
non-elastic tape at midway between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. Height was
measured by portable stadiometer. Body weight was assessed using digital scales
(Omron BF510, Kyoto, Japan) equipped for determination of total body fat percentage
employing bioimpedance method. Blood pressure was measured by digital BP monitor
(Omron M-6 COMFORT, Kyoto, Japan) on the right arm, after comfortably seated subject
relaxed for at least 10 minutes. An average of the last 2 measurements out of 3 was
taken as the resultant value. Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio were
calculated. Subjects displaying waist/height >0.50 were classified as
centrally obese [30]. A new
body shape index (ABSI) [31]
was calculated using scaling coefficients derived from our cohort, separately for
girls and boys. For this calculation waist circumference measured according to the
NHANES protocol was used [32].
Coefficients of regressing log waist circumference upon log weight and log height
were calculated for both genders separately and rounded to ratio of small integers
[31].
Blood and urine analyses
Blood and urine samples were collected at 5 health centers located in Bratislava
region, and thereafter transferred by blood curriers to the central laboratory for
analyses. Blood was withdrawn in the morning hours (7.00–9.00 a.m.) after
overnight fasting. Blood count and concentrations of glucose, insulin, albumin,
creatinine, urea, uric acid, total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol,
triacylglycerols (TAG), and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured
using standard laboratory methods (Advia 2400 analyzer, Siemens). Spot urine samples
from the first morning void at home were collected, and analyzed for creatinine
(kinetic Jaffe’s reaction), albumin concentration (immunoturbidimetrically)
and specific gravity. Calculations: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) via
the Friedewald equation; insulin sensitivity using Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity
Check Index (QUICKI) [33];
atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) as log(TAG/HDL-C) [34]; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGRF) via
Schwartz (in subjects aged ≤18 years) and MDRD (in 19–20 year-olds)
formulas [35, 36]. ACR of 2.5–25.0
mg/mmol in boys and 3.5–35.0 mg/mmol in girls were classified as MA, lower
values as normoalbuminuria (NA), and higher as overt proteinuria [37]. Although derived from
population studies in adults, these cut-offs are used also in the pediatric
populations.
Statistical analyses
The primary outcomes for the analysis were MA as categorical, and ACR as continuous
variable. Due to different ACR cut-off values males and females were evaluated
separately. Data not fitting to normal distribution were logarithmically transformed
prior to statistical evaluation, but for better understanding means±SD are
presented, if not indicated differently. Multivariate analyses—Principal
component analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant
analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed to identify variables contributing to between group
separation (e.g. NA vs. MA), using Simca v.13 software (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden).
Variables with Variable of importance for the projection (VIP) values >1 were
considered important contributors to between group separation, those with VIP
<0.5 unimportant. VIP ranging between 0.5-to-1 is referred to as a
“grey interval”, importance of the variable depends on the sample size.
Two-sided Student's T-test was used to compare 2 groups—NA vs. MA, lower vs.
upper quartile within NA range, lean vs. centrally obese. Categorical data were
compared using chi-square test (with Yates’s correction, if appropriate). SPSS
statistical software (v.16 for Windows, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) was used, with a
significance set at p<0.05.
Results
Cohort characteristics are given in Table
1. Girls and boys differed significantly in all variables except for age,
insulin sensitivity and TAG levels.
Table 1
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics of the subjects.
Boys
Girls
N
1 316
1 350
Age (years)
16.8 ± 1.3
16.8 ± 1.2
Height (cm)
179.0 ± 6.8
165.7 ± 6.2***
Weight (kg)
74.3 ± 13.8
60.3 ± 10.3***
Waist cf. (cm)
79.5 ± 9.1
71.6 ± 7.7***
Waist/height
0.44 ± 0.05
0.43 ± 0.05***
BMI (kg/m2)
23.1 ± 3.8
21.9 ± 3.4***
ABSI
0.0673 ± 0.0038
0.0979 ± 0.0064***
Total body fat (%)
17.5±
7.3
30.3±
6.9***
SBP (mm Hg)
123 ± 12
107 ± 9***
DBP (mm Hg)
73 ± 8
70 ± 8***
PP (mm Hg)
50 ± 10
37 ± 7***
MAP (mm Hg)
89 ± 8
83 ± 8***
Albumin (g/l)
48.5 ± 2.2
47.2 ± 2.4***
FPG (mmol/l)
4.9 ± 0.4
4.7 ± 0.4***
FPI (mIU/l)
11.0 ±
7.6
11.1 ±
6.1*
QUICKI
0.344 ± 0.027
0.343 ± 0.024
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
3.83 ± 0.70
4.24 ± 0.75***
HDL-C (mmol/l)
1.25 ± 0.23
1.51 ± 0.30***
LDL-C (mmol/l)
2.18 ± 0.59
2.33 ± 0.60***
TAG (mmol/l)
0.88 ±
0.46
0.89 ±
0.39
AIP
-0.44 ± 0.52
-0.60 ± 0.46***
Uric acid (μmol/l)
355 ± 60
259 ± 50***
hsCRP (mg/l)
1.07 ±
2.08
1.41 ±
3.12*
Hcy (μmol/l)
12.1 ±
6.1
9.8 ±
3.2***
Urea (mmol/l)
4.47 ± 1.06
3.73 ± 0.89***
Creatinine (μmol/l)
76 ± 13
61 ± 8***
eGFR (ml/s/1.73m2)
1.70 ± 0.25
1.54 ± 0.22***
ACR (mg/mmol)
0.61 ±
1.12
0.90 ±
2.11***
Urine density (kg/m3)
1021 ± 6
1020 ± 7***
WBC (x.109/l)
6.4 ± 1.4
6.9 ± 1.8***
RBC (x.1012/l)
5.1 ± 0.3
4.5 ± 0.3***
Platelets (x.109/l)
248 ± 49
275 ± 58***
cf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate;
WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not significant;
italics: not normally distributed data evaluated
statistically after logarithmic transformation; data presented as
mean ± SD;
* p<0.05,
** p<0.01,
***p<0.001 vs. boys
cf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate;
WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not significant;
italics: not normally distributed data evaluated
statistically after logarithmic transformation; data presented as
mean ± SD;* p<0.05,** p<0.01,***p<0.001 vs. boys
MA prevalence and level—between gender comparisons
Boys, regardless whether normoalbuminuric or microalbuminuric (Tables 1 and 2), presented lower ACR
(p>0.001, all) if compared with girls (Tables 1 and 3). Prevalence of MA reached 3.3% in both genders (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2
Characteristics of boys presenting normo- and microalbuminuria, and
albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in the upper and lower quartiles of
normoalbuminuric range.
Normoalbuminuria
Microalbuminuria
Lower quartile of NA
Upper quartile of NA
ACR < 2.5 mg/mmol
ACR = 2.5–25.0 mg/mmol
ACR ≤ 0.23 mg/mmol
ACR ≥ 0.58 mg/mmol
N
1 273 (96.7%)
43 (3.3%)
296
327
Age (years)
16.8 ± 1.3
16.7 ± 1.4
17.0 ± 1.2
16.7 ± 1.3††
Height (cm)
179.0 ± 6.8
179.4 ± 6.2
180.1 ± 6.5
179.0 ± 6.9†
Weight (kg)
74.4 ± 13.9
70.2 ± 10.9*
76.5 ± 13.4
72.3 ± 13.3†††
Waist cf. (cm)
79.6 ± 9.1
75.8 ± 6.4**
80.3 ± 8.8
75.2 ± 8.8††
Waist/height
0.45 ± 0.05
0.42 ± 0.04**
0.45 ± 0.05
0.44 ± 0.05†
BMI (kg/m2)
23.2 ± 3.8
21.8 ± 3.0*
23.5 ± 3.8
22.5 ± 3.7††
ABSI
0.0673 ± 0.0042
0.0678 ± 0.0040
0.0669 ± 0.0035
0.0676 ± 0.0036†
Total body fat (%)
17.5 ±
7.3
15.1 ±
5.7*
18.1 ±
7.1
16.3 ±
7.3††
SBP (mm Hg)
123 ± 12
121 ± 12
124 ± 12
121 ± 11
DBP (mm Hg)
73 ± 8
73 ± 9
73 ± 8
72 ± 8
PP (mm Hg)
50 ± 10
47 ± 8
51 ± 10
49 ± 9††
MAP (mm Hg)
89 ± 8
89 ± 9
89 ± 9
89 ± 8
Albumin (g/l)
48.5 ± 2.2
48.6 ± 2.6
48.2 ± 2.1
48.6 ± 2.3
FPG (mmol/l)
4.9 ± 0.4
4.9 ± 0.4
4.9 ± 0.4
4.9 ± 0.4
FPI (mIU/l)
11.1 ±
7.5
10.9 ±
9.9
11.1 ±
6.8
11.1 ±
7.8
QUICKI
0.344±0.027
0.349.032
0.342±0.027
0.344.027
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
3.82 ± 0.70
3.87 ± 0.86
3.88 ± 0.69
3.76 ± 0.74†
HDL-C (mmol/l)
1.25 ± 0.23
1.28 ± 0.22
1.26 ± 0.22
1.26 ± 0.23
LDL-C (mmol/l)
2.18 ± 0.58
2.21± 0.71
2.20 ± 0.57
2.12± 0.60
TAG (mmol/l)
0.88 ±
0.47
0.84 ±
0.27
0.92 ±
0.49
0.84 ±
0.44††
AIP
-0.44 ± 0.53
-0.46 ± 0.36
-0.40 ± 0.51
-0.49 ± 0.51†
Uric acid (μmol/l)
355 ± 59
351 ± 69
363 ± 61
346 ± 60††
hsCRP (mg/l)
1.07 ±
2.07
1.02 ±
2.37
1.05 ±
1.68
0.94 ±
2.08†
Hcy (μmol/l)
12.2 ±
6.2
11.0 ±
3.5
12.0 ±
5.8
12.0 ±
6.5
Urea (mmol/l)
4.45 ± 1.05
4.90 ± 1.24**
4.57 ± 1.02
4.52 ± 1.20
Creatinine (μmol/l)
77 ± 13
75 ± 9
79 ± 13
74 ± 12†††
eGFR (ml/s/1.73m2)
1.70 ± 0.25
1.76± 0.21
1.65 ± 0.25
1.76± 0.25†††
ACR
0.46 ±
0.38
4.98±
3.82***
0.16 ±
0.05
1.54±
1.96†††
Urine density (kg/m3)
1021 ± 7
1023 ± 6*
1019 ± 7
1022 ± 7†††
WBC (x.109/l)
6.4 ± 1.4
6.3 ± 1.4
6.4 ± 1.4
6.3 ± 1.4
RBC (x.1012/l)
5.1 ± 0.3
5.1 ± 0.2
5.2 ± 0.3
5.1 ± 0.3
Platelets (x.109/l)
248 ± 49
250 ± 50
248 ± 50
248 ± 49
cf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration
rate; WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not
significant; italics: not normally distributed data
evaluated statistically after logarithmic transformation; data
presented as mean ± SD;
* p<0.05,
** p<0.01,
***p<0.001 vs. normoalbumiuria;
† p<0.05,
†† p<0.01,
†††p<0.001 vs. lower quartile
Table 3
Characteristics of girls presenting normo- and microalbuminuria, and
albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in the upper and lower quartiles of
normoalbuminuric range.
Normoalbuminuria
Microalbuminuria
Lower quartile of NA
Upper quartile of NA
ACR < 3.5 mg/mmol
ACR = 3.5–35.0 mg/mmol
ACR ≤ 0.29 mg/mmol
ACR ≥ 0.76 mg/mmol
N
1 305 (96.7%)
45 (3.3%)
314
333
Age (years)
16.9 ± 1.2
16.5 ± 1.1
16.9 ± 1.1
16.9 ± 1.3
Height (cm)
165.7 ± 6.2
166.4 ± 6.7
166.5 ± 6.1
166.2 ± 6.4
Weight (kg)
60.3 ± 10.2
58.1 ± 10.5
61.9 ± 10.5
58.9 ± 10.6†††
Waist cf. (cm)
71.7 ± 7.7
70.8 ± 8.8
72.7 ± 8.0
70.7 ± 7.7††
Waist/height
0.43 ± 0.05
0.43 ± 0.05
0.44 ± 0.05
0.43 ± 0.05††
BMI (kg/m2)
22.0 ± 3.4
21.0 ± 3.5
22.3 ± 3.5
21.3 ± 3.5†††
ABSI
0.0979 ± 0.0064
0.0978 ± 0.0071
0.0980 ± 0.0062
0.0989 ± 0.0067
Total body fat (%)
30.4±
6.9
27.6±
8.3*
31.1±
7.0
29.2±
6.9†††
SBP (mm Hg)
107 ± 9
109 ± 9
107 ± 10
108 ± 10
DBP (mm Hg)
70 ± 8
71 ± 7
71 ± 7
71 ± 8
PP (mm Hg)
37 ± 7
387± 7
37 ± 7
37± 7
MAP (mm Hg)
83 ± 8
84 ± 7
83 ± 8
83 ± 8
Albumin (g/l)
47.2 ± 2.3
47.9 ± 3.1
46.8 ± 2.3
47.3 ± 2.4††
FPG (mmol/l)
4.7 ± 0.4
4.7 ± 0.4
4.6 ± 0.4
4.7 ± 0.4†
FPI (mIU/l)
11.1 ±
6.1
10.6 ±
5.5
11.3 ±
7.1
11.1 ±
6.0
QUICKI
0.343 ± 0.024
0.347 ± 0.029
0.344 ± 0.025
0.343 ± 0.025
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
4.25 ± 0.75
4.16 ± 0.72
4.30 ± 0.74
4.16 ± 0.75†
HDL-C (mmol/l)
1.51 ± 0.30
1.50 ± 0.25
1.51 ± 0.30
1.52 ± 0.29
LDL-C (mmol/l)
2.33 ± 0.60
2.28 ± 0.61
2.37 ± 0.59
2.25 ± 0.61†
TAG (mmol/l)
0.89 ±
0.40
0.83 ±
0.31
0.92 ±
0.40
0.85 ±
0.37††
AIP
-0.60 ± 0.46
-0.64 ± 0.45
-0.55 ± 0.45
-0.65 ± 0.45
Uric acid (μmol/l)
259 ± 51
263 ± 42
267 ± 49
252 ± 50†††
hsCRP (mg/l)
1.39 ±
2.96
1.99 ±
6.13
1.42 ±
2.74
1.39 ±
3.22
Hcy (μmol/l)
9.8 ±
3.1
10.5 ±
5.1
9.8 ±
3.2
9.8 ±
3.2
Urea (mmol/l)
3.73 ± 0.90
3.72 ± 0.76
3.78 ± 0.92
3.72 ± 0.89
Creatinine (μmol/l)
61 ± 8
62 ± 7
63 ± 8
60 ± 8†††
eGFR (ml/s/1.73m2)
1.55 ± 0.22
1.51 ± 0.20
1.50 ± 0.21
1.57 ± 0.24†††
ACR
0.61 ±
0.54
9.28 ±
7.30***
0.20 ±
0.06
2.46 ±
3.84†††
Urine density (kg/m3)
1020 ± 7
1018 ± 7
1018 ± 7
1021 ± 7††
WBC (x.109/l)
6.9 ± 1.8
7.0 ± 1.9
6.9 ± 1.6
6.8 ± 1.7
RBC (x.1012/l)
4.5 ± 0.3
4.6 ± 0.3
4.6 ± 0.3
4.5 ± 0.3
Platelets (x.109/l)
275 ± 58
271 ± 44
278 ± 57
273 ± 56
cf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration
rate; WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not
significant; italics: not normally distributed data
evaluated statistically after logarithmic transformation; data
presented as mean ± SD;
* p<0.05,
** p<0.01,
***p<0.001 vs. normoalbumiuria;
† p<0.05,
†† p<0.01,
†††p<0.001 vs. lower quartile
cf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration
rate; WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not
significant; italics: not normally distributed data
evaluated statistically after logarithmic transformation; data
presented as mean ± SD;* p<0.05,** p<0.01,***p<0.001 vs. normoalbumiuria;† p<0.05,†† p<0.01,†††p<0.001 vs. lower quartilecf.: circumference; BMI: body mass index; ABSI: a new body shape index; SBP:
systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure;
MAP: mean arterial pressure; FPG: fasting serum glucose; FPI: fasting serum
insulin; IU: international units; QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity
check index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; C: cholesterol; LDL: low density
lipoprotein; TAG: triacylglycerols; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; hsCRP:
high sensitive C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration
rate; WBC: white blood cells count; PBC: red blood cells count; NS: not
significant; italics: not normally distributed data
evaluated statistically after logarithmic transformation; data
presented as mean ± SD;* p<0.05,** p<0.01,***p<0.001 vs. normoalbumiuria;† p<0.05,†† p<0.01,†††p<0.001 vs. lower quartileMean ACR among microalbuminuric subjects was low (Tables 2 and 3), in both genders within the
1st quartile of the respective microalbuminuric range. Among
microalbuminuric boys 91% presented ACR values within the lower, and none of them
within the upper quartile. 71% of microalbuminuric girls presented ACR values within
the 1st and 7% within the 4th quartile.
Association between microalbuminuria and cardiometabolic risk factors
Boys
PCA: The scores scatter plot showed that >95% of scores were situated
within the Hotelling’s T2 tolerance ellipse, without major outliers,
apparent groupings or similarities. Five component model was calculated,
explaining 55% of variation, but with poor predictability (21%). The loadings
scatter plot suggested that the model does not explain ACR well. OPLS-DA model
revealed apparent separation between the NA and MA groups (Fig 1) but variation explained by
the model (R2 = 30%) and its ability to predict new data (Q2
= 28%) were poor. ACR appeared as the major variable contributing to the
separation between the groups (Fig
2), with variable of importance for the projection (VIP) value = 5.3,
while serum urea levels and urine density higher in the MA subjects, and
waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, BMI, percentage of total body fat,
body weight, and pulse pressure lower in MA adolescents appeared as variables
potentially significantly contributing to between group separation, with VIP
values ranging between 0.79-to-0.51 (Fig 3).
Fig 1
Score scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA, green
circles) and microalbuminuric (MA, red circles) boys.
Scores are orthogonal (= completely independent from each other),
representing new variables summarizing the input of all determined variables
(herein the morphometric and biochemical variables) so that one score vector
corresponds to one subject, having its own score vector. Observations
situated far outside Hotelling’s T2 tolerance ellipse are outliers.
Model reveals partial overlapping of NA and MA subjects (separation in
direction of x-axis). Separation in direction of y-axis represents within
group variability.
Fig 2
Loading scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA) and
microalbuminuric (MA) boys.
Dummy variables (blue circles) characterize the respective 2 groups
categorized according to absence (DANA) and presence (DAMA) of
microalbuminuria. Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) adjacent to dummy
variable DAMA represents the most significant component with discriminatory
power determining the separation between the groups. Microalbuminuric boys
also tend to present higher urine density and serum urea levels, and low
total body fat percentage, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, waist
circumference and body weight (far right to dummy DAMA variable). Variables
positioned near to intersect are similar in NA and MA cohorts thus do not
contribute to between groups separation.
Fig 3
Plot of variables of importance contributing to between group separation
among normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric boys.
Plot of variables importance for the projection (VIP) summarizes the
importance of the variables both to explain X and to correlate to dummy
variables (Figs 1 and
2). VIP values
>1 indicate „important”X variables, <0.5
“unimportant” X variables, in the “grey
interval” (0.5-to-1) the importance depends on the sample size. This
plot confirms the OPLS-DA loadings scatter plot (Fig 2), showing that the
variables adjacent to the origin in the former plot do not contribute to
between group separation significantly. Abbreviations used in Figs 2 and 3: ACR: urinary
albumin-to-creatinine ratio; WHR: waist-to-height ratio; waist: waist
circumference; BMI: body mass index; uRo: urine density; weight: body
weight; PP: pulse pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate;
QUICKI: quantitative insulin check index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; Hcy:
homocysteine; Crea: serum creatinine; Ins: fasting serum insulin; HDL: high
density lipoprotein cholesterol; ABSI: a new body shape index; hsCRP: high
sensitivity C-reactive protein; Glu: fasting serum glucose; DBP: diastolic
blood pressure; Alb: serum albumin; Chol: cholesterol; UA: serum uric acid;
WBC: white blood cells count; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; AIP:
atherogenic index of plasma; RBC: red blood cells count; Plt: platelet
count; MAP: mean arterial pressure; TAG: triacylglycerols.
Score scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA, green
circles) and microalbuminuric (MA, red circles) boys.
Scores are orthogonal (= completely independent from each other),
representing new variables summarizing the input of all determined variables
(herein the morphometric and biochemical variables) so that one score vector
corresponds to one subject, having its own score vector. Observations
situated far outside Hotelling’s T2 tolerance ellipse are outliers.
Model reveals partial overlapping of NA and MA subjects (separation in
direction of x-axis). Separation in direction of y-axis represents within
group variability.
Loading scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA) and
microalbuminuric (MA) boys.
Dummy variables (blue circles) characterize the respective 2 groups
categorized according to absence (DANA) and presence (DAMA) of
microalbuminuria. Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) adjacent to dummy
variable DAMA represents the most significant component with discriminatory
power determining the separation between the groups. Microalbuminuric boys
also tend to present higher urine density and serum urea levels, and low
total body fat percentage, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, waist
circumference and body weight (far right to dummy DAMA variable). Variables
positioned near to intersect are similar in NA and MA cohorts thus do not
contribute to between groups separation.
Plot of variables of importance contributing to between group separation
among normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric boys.
Plot of variables importance for the projection (VIP) summarizes the
importance of the variables both to explain X and to correlate to dummy
variables (Figs 1 and
2). VIP values
>1 indicate „important”X variables, <0.5
“unimportant” X variables, in the “grey
interval” (0.5-to-1) the importance depends on the sample size. This
plot confirms the OPLS-DA loadings scatter plot (Fig 2), showing that the
variables adjacent to the origin in the former plot do not contribute to
between group separation significantly. Abbreviations used in Figs 2 and 3: ACR: urinary
albumin-to-creatinine ratio; WHR: waist-to-height ratio; waist: waist
circumference; BMI: body mass index; uRo: urine density; weight: body
weight; PP: pulse pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate;
QUICKI: quantitative insulin check index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; Hcy:
homocysteine; Crea: serum creatinine; Ins: fasting serum insulin; HDL: high
density lipoprotein cholesterol; ABSI: a new body shape index; hsCRP: high
sensitivity C-reactive protein; Glu: fasting serum glucose; DBP: diastolic
blood pressure; Alb: serum albumin; Chol: cholesterol; UA: serum uric acid;
WBC: white blood cells count; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; AIP:
atherogenic index of plasma; RBC: red blood cells count; Plt: platelet
count; MAP: mean arterial pressure; TAG: triacylglycerols.T-test comparing the variables between NA vs. MA groups confirmed the results from
multivariate analyses, except for significance in pulse pressure (Table 2). Thus,
microalbuminuric boys had significantly lower mean body weight, waist
circumference, waist-to-height ratio, BMI, and total body fat; and higher serum
urea levels and urine density (both significant within the reference range) in
comparison with their normoalbuminuric counterparts.Low prevalence of MA and a lacking relationship between ACR and CV risk factors
led us to speculate whether in apparently healthy adolescents ACR in
microalbuminuric range reflects cardiovascular risk factors-associated endothelial
damage. It might have been an evidence of e.g. orthostatic, post-exercise, or
post-infectious MA, incorrect collection (not midstream urine, lack of hygiene),
recent manipulation or sexual activity. Since in apparently healthy adults
albuminuria well below the threshold may be a marker for subclinical vascular
damage that predisposes to future CV disease and death (reviewed in [38]), we compared the subjects
presenting ACR within the upper vs. lower quartile of normoalbuminuria. In this
setting high normal ACR associated with slender stature, without any significant
relationship with increased cardiometabolic risk markers (Table 2). Interestingly, these
slimmer boys presented more central concentration of body volume (as follows from
higher ABSI) and slightly higher eGFR (within the normal range).
Microalbuminuria in lean vs. centrally obese boys
Eleven point four percent of boys presented central obesity (waist-to-height
ratio: 0.55±0.04 vs. 0.42±0.03, respectively; p<0.001). ACR
did not differ significantly in lean versus centrally obeseboys in the whole
(Fig 4a), and
normoalbuminuric cohorts (Fig
4b; waist-to-height ratio: 0.43±0.03 vs. 0.55±0.04,
respectively; p<0.001), while centrally obese microalbuminuric boys
presented significantly lower ACR if compared with their lean counterparts (Fig 4c; waist-to-height ratio
0.52±0.01 vs. 0.42±0.03, respectively; p<0.001).
Fig 4
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio in lean and centrally obese boys.
a/ whole cohort; b/ normoalbuminuric boys; c/ microalbuminuric boys. ACR:
urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CO: centrally obese subjects; box plot
indicates quartiles and whiskers the 5th and the 95th
percentiles.
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio in lean and centrally obese boys.
a/ whole cohort; b/ normoalbuminuric boys; c/ microalbuminuric boys. ACR:
urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CO: centrally obese subjects; box plot
indicates quartiles and whiskers the 5th and the 95th
percentiles.Prevalence of MA in lean (3.4%) vs. centrally obeseboys (1.8%) did not differ
significantly (Yates’ chi-square p = 0.32).In lean boys comparison of NA and MA groups employing OPLS-DA or t-test revealed
similar results as obtained in the whole cohort. Number of centrally obese
microalbuminuric boys was unfortunately too low (n = 3) to allow valid testing of
associations among these subjects.
Girls
Similarly to the boys, OPLS-DA model showed apparent separation between NA and MA
groups but explanation of variability and predictability of the model was poor
(R = 36%, Q = 33%) (S1 Fig).
Separation between the groups was particularly on the account of ACR (VIP = 5.4).
Additional potentially significantly contributing variables to between groups
separation were total body fat percentage (VIP = 0.50) lower in microalbuminuric
girls, and serum albumin levels (VIP = 0.51) higher in MA girls (S2 and S3 Figs).T-test indicated that microalbuminuric girls differ significantly from their
normoalbuminuric counterparts only by lower total body fat percentage (Table 3).Comparison between girls with NA in the upper and lower quartile confirmed that
those presenting NA within the 4th quartile were more slender, and
presented slightly and within the reference range, but significantly, elevated
fasting serum glucose, albumin, and eGRF (Table 3).
Microalbuminuria in lean vs. centrally obese girls
Central obesity was diagnosed in 8.2% of girls. Centrally obesegirls presented
lower ACR if compared with the lean ones (Fig 5a; waist-to-height ratio: 0.54±0.04 vs.
0.42±0.03, respectively, p<0.001). This was on the account of lower
ACR in normoalbuminuric centrally obese vs. lean girls (Fig 5b; waist-to-height ratio:
0.54±0.04 vs. 0.42±0.03, respectively; p<0.001), since ACR
did not differ significantly between lean and centrally obese microalbuminuric
girls (Fig 5c; waist-to-height
ratio: 0.42±0.03 vs. 0.56±0.08, respectively; p<0.001).
Fig 5
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio in lean and centrally obese girls.
a/ whole cohort; b/ normoalbuminuric girls; c/ microalbuminuric girls. ACR:
urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CO: centrally obese subjects; box plot
indicates quartiles and whiskers the 5th and the 95th
percentiles.
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio in lean and centrally obese girls.
a/ whole cohort; b/ normoalbuminuric girls; c/ microalbuminuric girls. ACR:
urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CO: centrally obese subjects; box plot
indicates quartiles and whiskers the 5th and the 95th
percentiles.Prevalence of MA did not differ significantly between lean (3.4%) and centrally
obese (2.7%) girls (Yates’ chi-square p = 0.91).OPLS-DA analysis as well as between group comparison using t-test yielded similar
results to those obtained in the whole cohort. Since the subset of
microalbuminuric centrally obesegirls was too small (n = 3), further statistical
analysis was not performed.
Comparison of microalbuminuria prevalence between the genders
Prevalence of MA was similar among lean (chi-square p = 0.94) as well as among
centrally obese (chi-square p = 1.0) girls and boys.
Discussion
Herein we present the first data on prevalence of MA in apparently healthy adolescents
from Slovakia—post-communist central European country with one of the highest CV
mortality rates in adults within EU-27 countries. Our study outmatches the previously
published ones by number of included adolescents and particularly the number of
investigated cardiometabolic markers. In contrast to our hypothesis, from the point of
MA renal and thus cardiovascular health of secondary school students in Bratislava
region is satisfactory: prevalence of MA is low, similar among girls and boys,
regardless of presence/absence of central obesity. Mean ACR was low, although higher in
girls in comparison with boys. Multivariate analysis did not reveal clear association
between MA and cardiometabolic risk markers; on the contrary, MA associated with lean
stature. Thus, in general population of adolescents MA is not associated with
cardiometabolic risk factors.
Prevalence of microalbuminuria
The prevalence of MA in our study (3.3%), was similar to that reported by Bangstedt
et al.−3.7% [15], and
lower than in the other studies on MA in general population of adolescents employing
ACR determination, indicating prevalence between 8.7%-to-16.3% [9-12]. The inconsistencies might be
caused due to differences in methodological approaches (timing of urine collection,
analytical methods of urinary albumin assessment, different cut-off values), age,
gender and racial disparities, life style related or other not completely understood
factors. Our ACR analyses in the first morning spot urine sample could eliminate the
falsely positive contribution of postural MA. Analysis of a single urine sample
could—due to high natural intraindividual variability of UAE
rate—equally bias the results of MA prevalence and levels in both directions.
Our probands were not instructed to skip their usual physical activity on the day
prior to biological material sampling. However, in recent study ACR did not differ
significantly between students with higher and standard sport activity program [14]. Slovakia is a country with
long tradition of unhealthy diet, with low intake of fruits, vegetables, fish and
fiber and high intake of fats, red meat and alcohol [29]. Thus, low prevalence and low levels of MA can hardly
be attributed to healthy dietary regimen, such as the consumption of Mediterranean
diet [18]. Since the
participation in our study was on voluntary basis we cannot exclude that we
investigated an “overhealthy” cohort. Rather low prevalence of central
obesity in our cohort supports this assumption.Sanchez et al. [9] reported
slightly higher prevalence of MA among adolescent boys in comparison with girls
(13.5% vs. 12.9%). In other three large studies prevalence of MA was higher among
girls (10.4%-to-16.3%) than boys (5.9%-to-11.0%) [7, 11, 14], while our
adolescents of both genders presented similar MA prevalence (3.3%). Reason behind
this disparity remains unclear. However, in accordance with several other reports our
girls presented higher ACR in comparison with boys [7, 12, 14, 23, 39]. This logically stems from
the lower muscle mass, and thus lower urinary creatinine excretion in females.
Opposite finding in 3L study regarding that male gender was an independent
significant determinant of higher ACR [18] may reflect higher incidence of benign orthostatic
proteinuria among boys [40,
41].
Association between ACR and cardiovascular risk markers
Only two studies in adolescents associated MA with standard biochemical
cardiovascular risk markers, e.g. glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, or hsCRP [10, 22]. While in the large study no
association between MA and biochemical variables was revealed in non-overweight
subjects [10], in the smaller
study a weakly significant direct relationship between UAE rate and fasting
insulinemia, and surprisingly an inverse relationship to hsCRP was revealed in
non-diabetic adolescents [22].
In our study only girls presenting NA within the upper quartile displayed also
slightly higher fasting serum glucose concentration, not associated with increased
insulinemia and insulin resistance. Thus it remains unclear whether early disturbance
in glucose homeostasis associates with incipient rise in ACR. Glucose clamp
techniques or at least glucose load studies, and particularly long follow-up studies
are needed to elucidate this question.Hannevold et al. reported significant direct relationship between UAE rate and
systolic BP in healthy black adolescent boys, but not in black girls or white
subjects of either gender [23]. Our findings correspond with those from other three studies not
revealing significant association between BP and MA in apparently healthy adolescents
[10, 12, 14].Studies focusing on renal function revealed no significant association between eGRF
and MA in adolescents [14,
19]. In our study subjects
presenting normoalbuminuria in the upper quartile exhibited slightly elevated eGFR.
This finding, together with higher serum urea levels in microalbuminuric boys and
higher urine density in microalbuminuric subjects and those presenting
normoalbuminuria in the upper quartile might point to higher protein intake as an
additional factor contributing to increased ACR in slender adolescents. In healthy
adults high chronic oral protein intake associates with high endogenous creatinine
clearance correlating directly and significantly with albumin excretion rate [42]. In general population of
middle-aged and elderly adults an increment of 0.1g/kg/day in protein intake
increased the adjusted risk for MA significantly: OR = 1.20, 95%, CI:
1.08–1.32 [43]. Spot
urine samples available in our study are not suitable for estimation of protein
intake: high intake of proteins of animal origin would result in simultaneous
increase in urinary excretion of urea and creatinine. To confirm our assumption on
the role of higher protein intake prospective studies estimating protein intake via
ureanitrogen appearance determination (requiring 24 h urine collection), and using
dietary recalls are required.
Effects of central obesity
Despite including a wide panel of potential cardiovascular risk markers and employing
two different statistical approaches, we only confirmed the well known and not
completely clear and understood paradox that apparently healthy adolescents
presenting MA tend to be leaner than their normoalbuminuric counterparts [10, 12, 14, 15, 18–20]. This finding is generally
explained as orthostatic proteinuria, a benign condition not associated with
long-term risk of renal disease if isolated [13, 41]. It is attributed to a “nutcracker
phenomenon“—entrapment of the left renal vein in the fork between the
aorta and proximal superior mesenteric artery, which may in an upright position
partially obstruct the left renal vein, leading to rise in glomerular trans-capillary
hydraulic pressure difference and via the actions of angiotensin II to efferent
arteriolar resistance, resulting in increased UAE [44, 45]. Thus in contrast with the adults in whom MA represents a first
clinical sign of obesity-associated nephropathy [8], in otherwise healthy adolescents MA appears not to be a
marker of central obesity, contrary, it associates with lean stature.
Limitations
The strength of our study is the large number of apparently healthy adolescents
investigated, analysis of numerous cardiometabolic risk markers, and a multivariate
statistical approach. Particularly in specialized secondary schools of the capital
and surroundings adolescents from whole Slovakia are enrolled. Thus we might
speculate that our results might acceptably mirror the situation in population of
white Caucasian students across the country. Our study also has several limitations.
Being cross-sectional in nature it allows us to comment only on associations. Our
data might be partially elusive, since based on a single urine analysis, obtained
from voluntarily participating subjects. With high probability our subjects were not
completely unrelated; siblings or close relatives could have participated. Low number
of centrally obese microalbuminuric subjects did not allow investigating the
associations in this specific cohort. Additional limitations are discussed above in
relation to pertinent subject.Taken together, our data suggest that in apparently healthy adolescents ACR is not
associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. Longitudinal follow-up studies until
adulthood are definitely needed to estimate the potential cardiometabolic risk of
apparently healthy adolescents presenting MA, as well as to elucidate whether
potential clustering of certain cardiometabolic markers predisposes apparently
healthy adolescents to early development of endothelial damage reflected by MA.
Score scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA, green circles)
and microalbuminuric (MA, red circles) girls.
(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Loading scatter plot from OPLS-DA model of normoalbuminuric (NA) and
microalbuminuric (MA) girls.
(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Plot of variables of importance contributing to between group separation among
normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric girls.
Abbreviations used in S2 and S3 Figs: ACR: urinary
albumin-to-creatinine ratio; WHR: waist-to-height ratio; waist: waist
circumference; BMI: body mass index; uRo: urine density; weight: body weight; PP:
pulse pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; QUICKI: quantitative
insulin check index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; Hcy: homocysteine; Crea: serum
creatinine; Ins: fasting serum insulin; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol;
ABSI: a new body shape index; hsCRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein; Glu:
fasting serum glucose; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; Alb: serum albumin; Chol:
cholesterol; UA: serum uric acid; WBC: white blood cells count; LDL: low density
lipoprotein cholesterol; AIP: atherogenic index of plasma; RBC: red blood cells
count; Plt: platelet count; MAP: mean arterial pressure; TAG:
triacylglycerols.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Marta B M Mazzoni; Lisa Kottanatu; Giacomo D Simonetti; Monica Ragazzi; Mario G Bianchetti; Emilio F Fossali; Gregorio P Milani Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: A Mazaraki; C Tsioufis; K Dimitriadis; D Tsiachris; E Stefanadi; A Zampelas; D Richter; A Mariolis; D Panagiotakos; D Tousoulis; C Stefanadis Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: John Robert Brandt; Aaron Jacobs; Hengameh H Raissy; Franceska Marie Kelly; Amy Otten Staples; Ellen Kaufman; Craig Stephen Wong Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Joachim Schrader; Walter Zidek; Ulrich Tebbe; W Dieter Paar; Peter Bramlage; D Pittrow; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Erin Rademacher; Michael Mauer; David R Jacobs; Blanche Chavers; Julia Steinke; Alan Sinaiko Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Katarína Šebeková; Radana Gurecká; Melinda Csongová; Ivana Koborová; Jozef Šebek Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.390