Hadi Shafiee1, Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy1, Franceline Juillard2, Mert Keser1, Magesh Sadasivam1, Mehmet Yuksekkaya1, Emily Hanhauser3, Timothy J Henrich3, Daniel R Kuritzkes3, Kenneth M Kaye2, Utkan Demirci4. 1. 1] Division of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA. 4. 1] Division of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA [2] Department of Radiology, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Abstract
We report a biosensing platform for viral load measurement through electrical sensing of viruses on a flexible plastic microchip with printed electrodes. Point-of-care (POC) viral load measurement is of paramount importance with significant impact on a broad range of applications, including infectious disease diagnostics and treatment monitoring specifically in resource-constrained settings. Here, we present a broadly applicable and inexpensive biosensing technology for accurate quantification of bioagents, including viruses in biological samples, such as plasma and artificial saliva, at clinically relevant concentrations. Our microchip fabrication is simple and mass-producible as we print microelectrodes on flexible plastic substrates using conductive inks. We evaluated the microchip technology by detecting and quantifying multiple Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) subtypes (A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus (KSHV) in a fingerprick volume (50 µL) of PBS, plasma, and artificial saliva samples for a broad range of virus concentrations between 10(2) copies/mL and 10(7) copies/mL. We have also evaluated the microchip platform with discarded, de-identified HIV-infected patient samples by comparing our microchip viral load measurement results with reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as the gold standard method using Bland-Altman Analysis.
We report a biosensing platform for viral load measurement through electrical sensing of viruses on a flexible plastic microchip with printed electrodes. Point-of-care (POC) viral load measurement is of paramount importance with significant impact on a broad range of applications, including infectious disease diagnostics and treatment monitoring specifically in resource-constrained settings. Here, we present a broadly applicable and inexpensive biosensing technology for accurate quantification of bioagents, including viruses in biological samples, such as plasma and artificial saliva, at clinically relevant concentrations. Our microchip fabrication is simple and mass-producible as we print microelectrodes on flexible plastic substrates using conductive inks. We evaluated the microchip technology by detecting and quantifying multiple HumanImmunodeficiency Virus (HIV) subtypes (A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus (KSHV) in a fingerprick volume (50 µL) of PBS, plasma, and artificial saliva samples for a broad range of virus concentrations between 10(2) copies/mL and 10(7) copies/mL. We have also evaluated the microchip platform with discarded, de-identified HIV-infectedpatient samples by comparing our microchip viral load measurement results with reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as the gold standard method using Bland-Altman Analysis.
The development of sensitive, portable, rapid, and cost-effective virus detection and
quantification in biological samples has broad diagnostic and biosafety applications in
food safety, homeland security, and infectious disease diagnosis123. It has the potential to revolutionize personal healthcare in
resource-constrained settings as well as developed countries. The development of such
point-of-care (POC) assays for viral load measurement is currently a significant
technical and clinical challenge and requires innovative and urgent solutions at the
interface of engineering and medicine45. Commercially available
assays for sensitive viral load measurement, including reverse
transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), require nucleic acid
amplification or signal amplification, which are labor-intensive, expensive,
time-consuming, and complex. Despite the recent advances in micro- and
nano-technologies, which have shown a great promise for the development of POC
diagnostic platforms, there is currently no commercially available biosensor for POC
viral load measurement that is rapid, sensitive, inexpensive, and easy-to-use suitable
for resource-constrained settings6789101112. A major
challenge in developing POC viral load measurement platforms is the sensitive and
specific detection and quantification of viruses using a fingerprick volume
(<100 µL) of biological samples at clinically relevant
concentrations without the need for amplification and sample preprocessing. Here, we
present a printed flexible plastic microchip technology that can capture and quantify
viruses in a variety of biological samples, including plasma and artificial saliva,
through electrical sensing of viral lysate. The integration of electrical sensing with
printed flexible plastic microfluidics can potentially provide a promising opportunity
to develop an innovative viral load measurement platform that addresses the current
clinical challenges associated with viral load testing114151617181920. To demonstrate the broad applications
of this biosensing platform, we evaluated our microchip technology to detect and
quantify multiple virus targets, including HumanImmunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1)
(subtypes A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and
Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus (KSHV) in spiked plasma and
artificial saliva samples as well as HIV-infectedpatient samples.
Results
Viral load measurement – HIV
Figure 1 shows the 3D schematics of the presented
technology for bioagent capture and detection on a printed flexible plastic
microchip through capacitance spectroscopy of bioagent lysate. To evaluate the
ability of the microchip to detect a broad range of targets in biological
samples with clinically relevant concentrations, we first demonstrated HIV viral
load measurement in a fingerprick volume (50 µL) of
spiked-Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and plasma samples for multiple HIV-1
subtypes (A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel) (Fig. 2).
HIV-1 particles were captured by biotinylated polyclonal anti-gp120 antibodies
anchored to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Fig.
1). Captured viruses were washed with a low-electrically
conductive solution (10% glycerol), and lysed using 1% Triton x-100. The virus
lysis step releases the charged molecules into the lysis buffer, i.e.
Triton x-100, which changes the bulk electrical properties of the solution.
Captured viruses were detected through capacitance spectroscopy of viral lysate
samples on a flexible plastic microchip with screen-printed electrodes. Our
preliminary experimental results, using diluted PBS in deionized (DI) water
samples, demonstrated that the impedance magnitude of the samples decreases,
while the capacitance magnitude increases due to an increase in electrical
conductivity of the samples (Supplementary Fig. S1a,
b). These results also demonstrated that capacitance spectroscopy
in our microchips provided a more sensitive detection method as compared to
impedance spectroscopy at 1,000 Hz (Supplementary
Fig. S1c). Moreover, these results show that the maximum
capacitance magnitude change in the samples occurred at frequencies between
100 Hz and 1,000 Hz (). We chose 1,000 Hz as the detection frequency
for viral load measurements as we observed lower noise at this frequency. We
measured the capacitance magnitude response due to virus lysis at 2V and
1,000 Hz in HIV-spiked PBS () and HIV-spiked plasma (Fig.
2) samples with clinically relevant virus dilutions between
102 copies/mL and
107 copies/mL. The lowest diluted virus concentrations
in HIV-spiked PBS samples with statistically significant capacitance change
compared to the control samples were 103 copies/mL (p
= 0.0005, n = 8), 102 copies/mL (p = 0.0104, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.0007, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.0002, n = 8),
102 copies/mL (p = 0.007, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.002, n = 8), and
103 copies/mL (p = 0.010, n = 8) for subtypes A,
B, C, D, E, G, and panel, respectively (Fig. S3).
Figure 1
3D Schematic of pathogen capture and detection on a printed flexible plastic
microchip.
(a) Magnetic beads conjugated with antibodies to capture HIV, EBV,
KSHV or E. coli are mixed with a fingerprick volume of a biological
sample off-chip. (b) Captured pathogens are washed 4 times with a low
conducting media (glycerol) to remove residual high electrically conductive
background. (c) The captured bioagents are then lysed with Triton
x-100 (d) The pathogen lysate is then injected into the chip for
capacitance measurement. The captured and isolated pathogens are detected
through capacitance spectroscopy of the lysate on a printed flexible plastic
microchip.
Figure 2
Microchip evaluation using HIV-1 subtypes spiked in plasma.
Linear correlation between viral load of the samples and on-chip capacitance
measurements at 2 V and 1 KHz for multiple HIV-1 subtypes A
(a), B (b), C (c), D (d), E (e), G
(f), and panel (g) showed coefficient of determinations
between 0.83 and 0.94. The lowest dilutions that showed significant
capacitance change compared to virus-free control plasma samples were
103 (p = 0.001, n = 8), 103 (p = 0.008, n
= 8), 102 (p = 0.049, n = 8), 102 (p = 0.0002,
n = 8), 103 (p = 0.002, n = 8), 103 (p =
0.0007, n = 8) and 104 (p = 0.004, n = 8) for viral load
measurement in plasma samples spiked with HIV-1 subtypes A (a), B
(b), C (c), D (d), E (e), G (f), and
panel (g), respectively. The limits of detection were established as
the lowest concentration from the experimental results with a statistically
significant difference (p<0.05) from virus-free control sample
calculated through Mann-Whitney method of analysis. (h) The general
trend of all subtypes of HIV-spiked plasma samples was obtained by
generating a simple linear regression using all of the experimental results
obtained from HIV-1 subtypes A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel. Error bars
represent standard error of mean. Control samples were pathogen-free plasma
samples. Horizontal black and red dotted lines represent the average
capacitance magnitude of the control samples and control ±
standard error, respectively.
We also observed that the lowest diluted virus concentrations in HIV-spiked
plasma samples with statistically significant capacitance change compared to the
control samples were 103 copies/mL (p = 0.001, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.008, n = 8),
102 copies/mL (p = 0.049, n = 8),
102 copies/mL (p = 0.0002, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.002, n = 8),
103 copies/mL (p = 0.0007, n = 8),
104 copies/mL (p = 0.004, n = 8) for HIV-1
subtypes A, B, C, D, E, G, and panel, respectively (Fig.
2). The different detection limits for HIV subtypes may be due to
the differences between the HIV-1gp120 envelope sequences of the subtypes used
in this study as compared to the sequence of the immobilized anti-gp120 antibody
used for virus capture. To demonstrate this difference, we report the gp120
sequence of the HIV subtypes A, B, D, E, and G aligned with the EU541617
reference strain used to generate the polyclonal anti-gp120 antibody (Supplementary Fig. S4). The inherent cumulative
inaccuracy of serial dilution can affect the coefficients of determination of
our samples making limit of detection determination challenging.
Viral load measurement - EBV and KSHV
To demonstrate the broad applicability of the microchip technology, we also
evaluated the platform to detect and quantify EBV and KSHV spiked in PBS and
artificial saliva samples. EBV and KSHV particles were selectively captured on
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads conjugated with biotinylated MA-gp350/250 and
MAb-K ORF 8.1A/B antibodies, respectively. The linear correlation between the
capacitance magnitude of the viral lysate and viral load of PBS and artificial
saliva samples spiked with EBV and KSHV are reported in Figure
3. The samples were spiked with viruses at concentrations
ranging from 102 copies/mL to
107 copies/mL. The lowest diluted virus concentrations
in EBV-spiked PBS and artificial saliva samples with statistically significant
capacitance change compared to the control samples were
104 copies/mL (p = 0.0070, n = 8) and
102 copies/mL (p = 0.0007, n = 8), respectively
(Fig. 3a, b). We also observed that the lowest
diluted virus concentrations in KSHV-spiked PBS and artificial saliva samples
with statistically significant capacitance change compared to the control
samples were 102 copies/mL (p = 0.0426, n = 8) and
103 copies/mL (p = 0.0047, n = 8), respectively
(Fig. 3c, d). Therefore, the presented
microchip technology satisfies the clinical requirement to detect EBV and
KSHV2122.
Figure 3
Microchip evaluation using EBV and KSHV spiked in PBS and saliva and
E.coli spiked in saliva samples.
Linear correlations between viral load of samples and on-chip capacitance
measurements at 2 V and 1 KHz for EBV-spiked PBS (a) and
saliva (b) samples were calculated. The lowest dilutions with
significant capacitance change as compared to virus-free control samples
were 104 copies/mL in EBV-spiked PBS (a, p
= 0.0070, n = 8) and 102 copies/mL in
EBV-spiked saliva (b, p = 0.0007, n = 8) samples. Linear
correlations between viral load of samples and on-chip capacitance
measurements at 2 V and 1 KHz for KSHV-spiked PBS (c) and
saliva (d) samples were calculated. The lowest dilutions with
significant capacitance change as compared to virus-free control samples
were 102 copies/mL (p = 0.0426, n = 8) and
103 copies/mL (p = 0.0047, n = 8) for
KSHV-spiked PBS and saliva samples, respectively. Error bars represent
standard error of mean. (e)
E. coli was spiked in artificial saliva. 5% Triton was used in
contrast to the 1% Triton used for viral lysis. The lowest statistically
significant dilution of stock is 104 (p = 0.0013, n = 8) and
was calculated utilizing Mann-Whitney analysis. Error bars represent SEM.
Control samples were pathogen-free (a, c) PBS and (b, d, e)
artificial saliva samples. Horizontal black and red dotted lines represent
the average capacitance magnitude of the control samples and control
± standard error, respectively.
Detection of bacterial pathogens
This microchip technology has the potential to selectively detect pathogens other
than viruses, including bacterial pathogens. Here, we present our results on
capture and detection of E. coli in artificial saliva using the printed
flexible plastic microchips. E. coli cells were selectively captured on
magnetic beads conjugated with anti-E. coli LPS antibody in
50 µL of diluted artificial saliva samples. The lowest
diluted cell concentration in E. coli-spiked artificial saliva samples
with statistically significant capacitance change compared to the control
samples was 104 cells/mL (p = 0.0013, n = 8) (Fig. 3e).
Specificity evaluation
To evaluate the specificity of the presented microchip technology, we tested the
platform to detect a target virus such as HIV or KSHV in the presence of other
bioagents such as EBV and E. coli. We have previously shown that HIV can
be specifically detected in the presence of other viruses, including EBV in
samples using electrical sensing of viral lysate on-chip9.
Here, we also studied if the presence of non-target pathogens such as E.
coli, which are much larger in size, may release a significantly higher
amount of ions into the solution. Control samples in our specificity evaluation
experiments were pathogen-free plasma and artificial saliva samples. Figure 4a shows the specificity evaluation results
for HIV detection in plasma samples in the presence of E. coli. In this
experiment, we used magnetic beads conjugated with anti-gp120 antibody to
selectively capture HIV. The capacitance magnitude of E. coli samples
without HIV was not statistically different than control samples
(p>0.05, n = 4) with a statistical power of 0.68. However, the
capacitance magnitude of the mixture of HIV subtype B and E. coli was
significantly different than control and E. coli samples
(p<0.05, n = 4) (Fig. 4a). These results
showed that anti-gp120 antibody specifically captured and isolated HIV and not
E. coli in the samples. Figure 4b shows
the specificity evaluation of the microchip for KSHV detection in the presence
of EBV and E. coli. We used anti-ORF K 8.1 A/B antibody for microchip
specificity evaluation to detect KSHV. The capacitance magnitude of the mixture
of E. coli and EBV did not show a statistically significant difference
(p>0.05, n = 4) compared to the control samples with a statistical
power of 0.73, whereas the capacitance magnitude of the mixture of KSHV, EBV,
and E. coli was significantly different than control samples, as well as
the mixture of EBV and E. coli samples (p<0.05, n = 4) (Fig. 4b). This is due to highly specific capture and
isolation of KSHV in the samples using anti-ORF K 8.1 A/B antibody.
Figure 4
Specificity evaluations of the microchip.
(a) HIV-1 subtype B was specifically captured and detected in the
presence of E. coli spiked in plasma samples. E. coli at
concentrations of 104 cells/mL and
106 cells/mL showed no significant difference
(p>0.05, n = 4) against HIV-free control. HIV-spiked samples
(104 copies/mL and
105 copies/mL) and the mixture of HIV-1 and E.
coli samples showed statistically different (p<0.05, n =
4) capacitance values compared to virus-free control samples. (b)
KSHV was specifically captured and isolated from a mixture of KSHV, EBV and
E. coli in artificial saliva. Mixtures of EBV (103 copies/mL and 105 copies/mL)
and E. coli (103 cells/mL and
105 cells/mL) showed no significant difference
(p>0.05, n = 4) in capacitance magnitude from KSHV-free control
samples. KSHV-spiked samples at concentrations of
103 copies/mL and
105 copies/mL showed a significant difference
(p<0.05, n = 4) from control. The capacitance magnitude of the
mixture of KSHV, EBV, and E. coli samples were also significantly
different than control samples. Brackets indicate statistically significant
capacitance magnitude shift between the linked groups. Control samples were
pathogen-free (a) plasma and (b) artificial saliva samples.
Error bars represent standard error of mean (n = 4).
Patient samples
We also evaluated our viral load measurement using five anonymous, discarded
HIV-infectedpatient plasma samples. We first generated a standard curve by
performing a least-square fit linear regression for HIV viral load measurement
using the experimental results with the HIV-spiked samples reported in (). We used this standard curve to translate the capacitance
magnitude measurement to viral load of the patient samples tested in this study.
The quantitative HIV viral load measurement results for the five patient samples
using our microchip platform and RT-qPCR are presented in . The capacitance magnitude change for
one of the patient samples, which had undetectable viral load by means of
RT-qPCR, was statistically negligible as compared to the control samples in our
microchip. The data point related to the viral load of this patient sample is
shown at the origin of Figure 5a. These results
were analyzed and statistically evaluated using the Bland-Altman method2324 and presented in Figure
5b. These results confirmed that there was no evidence for a
systematic bias for viral load measurement in HIV-infectedpatient samples using
our printed flexible plastic microchip technology.
Figure 5
Device validation with patient samples.
(a) Correlation data of microchip viral load and the viral load
obtained through RT-qPCR. Viral load of zero was considered for patients
with undetectable loads. Error bars represent standard error of mean (n =
8). (b) Bland-Altman comparison of viral loads obtained through
RT-qPCR and our printed flexible plastic microchip. Bland-Altman analysis
did not show any evidence of systematic bias. Quantitative information is
available in supplementary Table S2.
Discussion
We have previously shown that impedance magnitude of viral lysate can be used for
virus detection on microfluidic devices with gold microelectrodes fabricated on
glass substrates using lift-off lithography method9. We
detected HIV-1 spiked in PBS samples with virus concentrations on the order of
108 copies/mL. Here, we demonstrate a new microchip
technology for virus detection and quantification by integrating screen-printing
silver microelectrodes on flexible plastic substrates and capacitance spectroscopy.
Double layer capacitance at low frequencies, such as 1,000 Hz, in
electrically low conductive solutions, such as the viral lysate samples used in this
work, changes more significantly as the ion concentration in the sample increases
compared to impedance magnitude25. We have evaluated our
technology using multiple bioagents, including HIV, EBV, KSHV, and E. coli.
Our results show that this microchip technology can detect viruses in complex
biological samples, such as human plasma and artificial saliva, with clinically
relevant virus concentrations. This microchip technology can be used for acute HIV
detection, when maximum viral replication occurs26, as well as
for treatment failure diagnosis based on POC ART monitoring defined by the World
Health Organziation (WHO)13. Further technology development is
required to enhance the sensitivity comparable with PCR-based assays. This
biosensing platform can be potentially used for detection and quantification of
other viral particles that have well-described biomarkers and antibodies for
capture, including herpes, influenza, malaria, and tuberculosis.The presented microchip technology is a platform technology to detect and quantify
multiple viruses such as HIV, EBV, and KSHV. It can potentially detect multiple
viruses at the same time and on a single chip with parallel microchannels. In such a
device, each microchannel has a separate pair of microelectrodes for electrical
measurement and is functionalized with a specific antibody to capture a target virus
for detection. Such microchip design enables multiplexing, however, the cost per
test increases accordingly. Co-infections with other pathogens such as EBV,
Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Herpes simplex virus (HSV), and
Candida are also common in HIV-infectedpatients, specifically in those not
receiving ART. Therefore, multiplexing on a single chip to detect these pathogens at
the same time can have a significant impact on HIV management in developing
countries. Future studies can evaluate the specificity of the electrical sensing
microchip technology to detect HIV in the presence of CMV, HPV, HSV, and Candida in
plasma.To prepare this microchip technology for field-testing, further technology
development and optimization is required to perform all of the sample handling
steps, including virus capture, washing, and lysis on-chip. It is also important to
evaluate the effect of temperature, humidity, and stability of reactions at
different sites on the performance of this microchip technology with respect to
sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. Device throughput for viral load
testing is also another design parameter that should be addressed during technology
transfer and commercialization.The electrical measurements in this study were performed using an impedance
spectrometer to evaluate the performance of the microchip technology for AC
frequencies between 100 Hz and 1 MHz. These results show that
the electrical measurements can be done at a single frequency for multiple viruses,
i.e. 1,000 Hz. Therefore, it is potentially possible to build
a hand-held impedance/capacitance meter utilizing affordable miniaturized frequency
oscillators, microcontrollers, and impedance/capacitance meter microchips available
in the market.Here, we evaluated our printed flexible plastic microchip with respect to
sensitivity, specificity, and linearity. To validate this technology, other
parameters, including repeatability, robustness, precision, system suitability, and
performance over time should also be evaluated. Furthermore, it is also required to
evaluate the technology with other HIV subtypes, including the less common members
of group M (K, J, F, H, I), N, and O, as well as HIV-2 (groups A and B).Viral load measurement is critical in infectious disease diagnosis and treatment
monitoring, and can facilitate treatment expansion especially in
resource-constrained settings. ART is a successful treatment to suppress HIV,
prolong life in HIV-infectedpatients, and reduce HIV infection transmission rates,
and has become even more affordable and accessible in developing countries27. However, a majority of HIV-infected individuals do not
receive ART due to lack of affordable, rapid, and sensitive HIV diagnostic tools at
the POC28. Virological suppression represents the most accurate
immunological response of the patients to ART29. Thus, the most
accurate and preferred method for ART monitoring to diagnose treatment failure, as
recommended by the 2013 consolidated guidelines on the use of ART, is viral load
measurement30. Viral load testing is important for
identifying treatment failure and enabling medication changes or other interventions
to prevent immunologic compromise and clinical progression of disease. POC viral
load tests could be used to determine the efficacy of second line antiretroviral
therapies in addition to identifying failure of initial regimens. Early detection of
virological failure allows for both targeted adherence interventions and better
preservation of the efficacy of second-line regimens. In addition, POC viral load
testing may also be applied to the diagnosis of acute HIV infection and prompt
initiation of ART. Prompt ART initiation may lead to a greater preservation of
immune function and has the potential to reduce HIV-1 transmission. Currently
available RNA- and PCR-based assays for viral load measurement in developed
countries are expensive, laboratory-based, complex, time-consuming, and
labor-intensive, and cannot be easily used in resource-constrained settings. p24
assays and CD4+ cell counting strategy cannot be used for monitoring
the efficacy of treatment and detecting ART failure in patients3132333435. Therefore, to detect early virological
failure and to expand access to ART, new emerging technologies are urgently needed
to facilitate viral load testing at the POC3637383940.
POC viral load testing may lead to increasing the adherence and minimizing the drug
resistance through timely detection of virological failure414243.Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpes Virus (KSHV) and Epstein-Barr Virus
(EBV) are human gamma herpesviruses44. KSHV and EBV are the
causative agents of a number of malignancies, especially common in immunosuppressed
individuals such as those with HIV/AIDS. KSHV is the etiologic agent of
Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS)454647 and primary effusion
lymphoma (PEL)4849, and is strongly associated with
multicentric Castleman’s disease5051, an
aggressive lymphoproliferative disorder. KS is epidemic in sub Saharan Africa and is
the leading AIDS malignancy525354. EBV has a causative role
in several humanmalignancies, including Burkitt's lymphoma55, Hodgkin's lymphoma56,
nasopharyngeal carcinoma57, lymphoproliferative disease in
immune-suppressed patients58, and lymphomas in HIV-infected
patients59. There are no specific therapies available for
these cancers, and therapy generally relies on cytotoxic chemotherapy or improvement
of immune function. KSHV is frequently found in saliva of infected persons and oral
contact is the most common route of transmission in endemic regions606162. EBV also spreads through saliva and may initially
replicate in the oropharyngeal epithelium59. However, the
details of transmission are poorly understood. Rapid and efficient detection of KSHV
and EBV in saliva would enable studies to better understand viral transmission. Such
an understanding may lead to strategies to interrupt transmission of these viruses
and prevent virus-associated malignancies. Detection of viral load in blood can also
be useful to anticipate the onset of KSHV- and EBV-associated diseases or to monitor
the response to therapies. In fact, elevated KSHV viral load in blood has been shown
to predict the progression of KS6364. In addition, several
studies have shown a strong correlation between EBV burden in blood and presence of
post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in transplantation
recipients656667. Elevated EBV DNA in patients can be
detected prior to PTLD diagnosis68.Electrical sensing in microfluidics is insensitive to light intensity and does not
need the bulky equipment usually required in optical sensing platforms, and is a
powerful modality to create portable and sensitive biosensors2396970. Paper-based microfluidics has shown great
promise in developing affordable, mass-producible, and disposable POC diagnostic
assays for developing countries1471. Paper substrates are
light (~10 mg/cm2), thin, flexible, and disposable, and
paper microchips can be fabricated for a few cents14727374. Here, we fabricated our microchips by screen-printing conductive silver
ink on flexible hydrophobic plastic sheets that are thin, light, flexible, and
inexpensive. These advantages are similar to those of paper-based microfluidics. In
addition, our chip fabrication is less complicated as we do not use commonly used
methods for paper-based microfluidic fabrication, including photolithography19, plotting75, inkjet etching76, plasma etching77, or wax printing7879. We report a microchip technology that integrates
electrical sensing and printed flexible plastic microfluidics for inexpensive and
rapid viral load measurement through viral lysate capacitance spectroscopy. The
material cost of the microchip include less than 1 cent for flexible plastic sheets,
less than 10 cents for electrodes, and less than 1 cent for DSA. The material costs
for magnetic beads and antibody (anti-gp120 antibody) are 80 cents and 87 cents per
test, respectively. These costs do not include labor costs. Therefore, we present a
new viral load testing technology with the material cost per microchip of less than
$2. The current assay time in the laboratory can take up to an hour, including 30
minutes for sample incubation to capture viruses, 4 minutes for washing, 1 minute
for virus lysis, 10 minutes for read-out and analysis, and transfer steps. In this
microchip technology, viruses are captured and isolated from biological samples
off-chip utilizing highly specific antibodies. The virus lysis step in this method
releases charged molecules in viral particles into an electrically low conductive
solution, i.e. Triton x-100. These charged molecules change the electrical
properties of the bulk solution as well as double layer properties on the surface of
the electrodes. Capacitance spectroscopy of the viral lysate solution on-chip
reveals the virus concentration in the sample.There are a variety of inhibitory factors with different concentrations in biological
samples such as plasma, saliva, and semen. These inhibitory factors may have
interference with the infectivity of the virus in body fluids. For instance, HIV can
be reproduced and cultured in tissues and most of the body fluids such as plasma,
breast milk, and genital secretions, except saliva80. Saliva is
able to specifically suppress HIV-180. However, saliva does not
have a significant effect on the infectivity of other viruses such as EBV, Herpes
simplex virus (HSV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV)818283.
Saliva is also the vehicle of person-to-personKSHV spread608485. Inhibitory factors such as highly charged sulfated polysaccharides,
secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI), fibronectin, and thrombospondin 1
(TSP1) in whole saliva may interfere with the infectivity of HIV-1 through altering
the CD4-gp120 interactions8086. Such inhibitory factors may
be also present in plasma, but in very low concentrations8087. KSHV levels in blood can be quite variable, depending on the level of a
patient's immunosuppression, and burden of disease88. Furthermore, inhibitory factors may interfere in enzyme-based assays or
nucleic acid-based amplification methods. In our electrical sensing technology, we
first capture and isolate intact viruses from artificial saliva or plasma using
antibodies. The captured viruses are then washed several times to remove non-target
bioagents, including inhibitory factors, before viral lysis and detection. The
electrical sensing assay does not rely on enzyme-based processing or amplification
of nucleic acids. We have not observed interference from such inhibitory factors in
our studies using HIV-spiked plasma samples as well as HIV-infectedpatient plasma
samples. However, further evaluation is required to investigate the effect of
inhibitory factors on the performance of the electrical sensing microchip
technology. Viral load level in different body fluids such as plasma and saliva is
dynamic and may or may not be correlated with each other89. For
example, HIV load level in plasma and semen are correlated and can be influenced by
multiple factors such as antiretroviral therapy and adherence, HIV treatment
resistance, and the stage of HIV disease89. Also, HIV loads in
plasma and saliva are poorly correlated90.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Ultrapure grade (Type I) water was obtained through purification using
Milli-Q® Academic A-10® (Millipore). Phosphate buffered
saline (PBS) was obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, NY; 10010). Polyclonal
biotinylated goat anti-gp120 (4.0 mg/mL) for HIV-1 capture was
purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA; ab53937). Mouse monoclonal antibodies
reactive to proteins encoded by ORF K 8.1 A/B (0.86 mg/mL) of HHV-8
was purchased from Advanced biotechnologies (Columbia, MD; 13-212-100). Mouse
monoclonal antibodies reactive to 350/220 KDa viral glycoprotein of EBV were
purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA; MAB10219). Mouse monoclonal antibodies
reactive to E. colilipopolysaccharide (0.5 mg/mL) for E.
coli capture were acquired from Abcam (Cambridge, MA; AB35654). Glycerol
(56-81-5) and Triton x-100 (9002-93-1) were both purchased from Sigma (St.
Louis, MO). RPMI-1640 with L-Glutamine (10-040) was purchased from Corning
(Manassas, VA). Fetal bovine serum (100-106) was obtained from Gemini,
penicillin/streptomycin (15070-063) was purchased from Invitrogen, HEPES buffer
(15630-080) was purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY), and
recombinant humaninterleukin-2 (11011456001) was purchased from Roche.
Preparation of R20/IL-2
R20/IL-2 contains RPMI-1640 with L-Glutamine (300 mg/mL),
penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL 50 μg/mL),
fetal bovine serum (heat inactivated) 20%, 10 mM of HEPES buffer, and
100 U/mL of recombinant humaninterleukin-2.
Artificial saliva preparation
Artificial saliva prepared for these experiments has the following composition:
0.1 L each of 25 mM K2HPO4 (Sigma, 7758-11-4),
24 mM Na2HPO4 (Sigma, 7558-79-4),
150 mM KHCO3 (Sigma, 298-14-6), 1.5 mM
MgCl2 (Sigma, 7786-30-3), 0.1 L of 100 mM NaCl (Sigma,
7647-14-5), 0.006 L of 25 mM citric acid (Sigma, 77-92-9), and 0.1 L
of 5 mM CaCl2 (Sigma, 10043-52-4). The pH of the solution
was maintained at 6.7 through the addition of NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, 1310-73-2) or
HCl (Sigma, 7647-01-0). Although this artificial saliva solution does not have
proteins and enzymes, which are present in saliva making it a complex fluid, the
artificial saliva prepared here is a model system that mimics ionic strength and
ionic contents in saliva.
HIV-spiked plasma samples preparation
Human whole blood from HIV-free donors was acquired from Research Blood
Components, LLC, Cambridge, MA. Plasma was separated from whole blood samples
through centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 15 minutes. Plasma samples
were spiked with viruses at stock concentration of
108 copies/mL and serially diluted to prepare samples
with diluted virus concentrations between
102 copies/mL and
107 copies/mL.
HIV-infected patient samples
Discarded, de-identified clinical research plasma specimens from HIV-infectedpatients were used in this study. Informed consent was obtained from all
patients prior to sample collection. Blood was collected by peripheral
venipuncture. After initial centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 15
minutes to separate the cellular and plasma components, the plasma was removed
and centrifuged an additional time to remove possible debris. The resulting
plasma was frozen and stored at −80°C until use. Patient
samples (1 mL) were sent to the Infectious Diseases Clinic at the
Brigham and Women’s Hospital for viral load measurement using
Roche-COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test, v2.0. The study protocol
involving human subjects was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School. All experiments
involving human subjects were performed in accordance with the relevant approved
guidelines and regulations.
Printed flexible plastic microchip fabrication
Transparency sheets (3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, CG5000) were used as the substrates
of the microchip. With the use of a laser cutter (Universal Laser systems Inc.,
VLS 2.3, Scottsdale, AZ), inlet and outlets were cut into transparency sheets
with a radius of 0.65 mm91. The power and scan
rate at a height of 3.175 mm were at 83 W and 6 mm/s,
respectively. The channel (12 mm × 5 mm) was
cut into a double-sided adhesive (DSA; 3M; 8213) of 80 µm
thickness. The power and scan speed were 10 W and 6 mm/s
respectively, with the laser at a height of 3.175 mm. Silicone
adhesive (Loctite, Rocky Hill, CT; 341-882) and silver-vinyl ink
(<0.015 Ω/sq/mil; ECM, Delaware, OH; CI-1001)
pastes were mixed in a ratio of 1:5 (w/w) to make silver paste. The
dimensions of the electrodes (2 cm × 2 mm and
separated by 2 mm) were cut into the masking paper (Mask-ease, Blick
Art Materials; 44908-1003) with the laser cutter. The masking paper was taped
over the transparency sheet and the silver paste mixture was applied and was
smeared using a glass slide to create a uniform layer of the ink on top of the
paper substrate (Supplementary Fig. S5). The masking
tape was removed and the sheet was baked in an oven at 175°C for 3
hours. The transparency sheet with the printed electrodes was used as a base
substrate of the microchip. The DSA layer, with the microchannel designs cut on
it, was then attached to the paper substrate with printed electrodes and another
transparency paper was attached to the other side.
Magnetic bead preparation
200 µL of streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Thermo
Scientific, Rockford, IL; 88817) of 1 µm diameter was
washed three times with PBS in a microcentrifuge tube. A Magna GrIP™
(Millipore) magnetic stand was used to isolate magnetic beads during washing.
10 µL of biotinylated target antibody was added to the
solution. The mixture was incubated over-night on a shaker at
4°C.
Target bio-agent capture with conjugated beads
The antibody conjugated magnetic beads were washed twice with PBS and resuspended
in 2 mL PBS to remove any unconjugated antibody in the solution.
50 µL of magnetic beads was taken in a microcentrifuge
tube. The supernatant was removed with the help of Magna GrIP™ and
was replaced with 50 µL of the pathogen-spiked PBS,
plasma, and plasma sample. This sample-bead mixture was incubated at room
temperature for half an hour on a rotator (15 rpm). Control samples
for the experiments were prepared by mixing 50 µL of
virus-free PBS/saliva/plasma with magnetic beads.
Washing and viral lysis
The sample-bead mixture was washed with 10% (v/v) glycerol 4 times off-chip
following the room temperature incubation. The washing step effectively removes
electrically conductive solution from the sample. This is critical in reducing
sources of noise in the capacitance measurement results. The captured viruses
were then lysed off-chip by replacing the glycerol with
50 µL of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, which helps in breaking
down the lipid bilayer. The sample was incubated at room temperature with 1%
Triton X-100 for 1 minute prior to capacitance measurement on-chip.
Capacitance measurement
20 µL of viral lysate was injected into the printed
flexible plastic microchip and capacitance was measured using an LCR meter
(LCR8110G, GWInstek, CA) for frequencies between 100 Hz and
1 MHz and 2 V.
HIV culture
NIH provided all HIV-1 subtypes (A, B, C, D, E and G) and panel (circulating
recombinant forms, CRF01_AE and CRF02_AG) under the research and reagent
program. All subtypes were isolated from both Uganda and the United States. The
panel of isolates contains six strains of HIV-1 that are globally prevalent.
Standard co-culture methods were used to prepare viral stocks. Peripheral blood
mononuclear cells (PBMC) were extracted from donors (HIV-1 negative) using the
Ficoll Hypaque technique. PBMCs extracted from both HIV negative and HIV
positive donors were co-cultured after stimulation with PHA
(0.25 µg/mL) for 3 days. 100 U/mL of R20/IL-2
was used to maintain cultures incubated at 37°C with 5%
CO2 atmosphere. Culture supernatants were replaced by fresh
medium once every week. p24 levels of the supernatant were tested and when they
reached 20 ng/mL, cultures were terminated. Viral stocks were
serially diluted in PBS and plasma to prepare spiked samples with virus
concentrations ranging from 102 copies/mL to
107 copies/mL. Roche-COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan
HIV-1 test, v2.0 was used for viral load measurement in the stock virus samples
at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
KSHV and EBV production
iSLK.21992 cells (Gift from Don Ganem) were cultured in DMEM
medium supplemented with 10% bovine growth serum (BGS) (HyClone) and
15 μg/ml gentamicin. iSLK.219 cells were cultured in the
presence of 1 μg/mL puromycin and
250 μg/ml G418. B958 cells were cultured in RPMI medium
supplemented with 10% bovine growth serum (BGS) (HyClone) and
15 μg/mL gentamicin.Recombinant KSHV.BAC219 virus stocks were prepared from stable iSLK-219 cells
induced by doxycycline (1 μg/mL) in the absence of
puromycin, and G418. Three days later, supernatant was collected and cleared of
cells and debris by filtration (0.45 μm). Virus particles
were pelleted by centrifugation (13,300 g for 2 h at 4°C) using a
Sorvall SLA-600TC rotor.Infectious virus was assessed by titration of supernatants using infection of
293T cells. Cell-free virus supernatant was diluted in fresh medium
(2 mL final per well) and used to inoculate 293T cells seeded at
approximately 3.5 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates 24
h prior infection. Following inoculation, plates were immediately centrifuged
(600 × g for 1h at 25°C), and supernatant was
removed and replaced with fresh medium. The percentage of GFP-positive cells
(from GFP-KSHV) was analyzed 48h later by fluorescence-activated cell sorting
(FACS). Infectious units (IU) are expressed as the number of GFP-positive cells
per mL of cell-free virus supernatant 48h after infection.EBV virus stocks were prepared from B95893 induced by TPA
(20 ng/mL) and sodium butyrate (32 mM). One day after
induction, cells were centrifuged and media was replaced by fresh RPMI. Six days
later, supernatant was collected and cleared of cells and debris by filtration
(0.45 μm). Virus particles were collected by
centrifugation (13,300 g for 2 h at 4°C) using a Sorvall SLA-600TC
rotor.
E. coli sample preparation and lysis conditions
E. coli was cultivated from the DH5α strain by incubating them
overnight at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium that is composed of
10 g/L of tryptone, 5 g/L of yeast extract and
10 g/L of NaCl. E.coli was separated by centrifugation at
10,000 g for 3 minutes and suspended in freshly prepared artificial
saliva. E.coli lysis was performed with the same viral lysis protocol
(see methods section) but with 5% Triton x-100 replacing 1% Triton x-100 as the
lysing agent. Incubation after the addition of 5% Triton x-100 was at
60°C to improve the lysis of E.coli.
Statistical analysis
The normality of the data collected for capacitance measurement was analyzed
using Anderson-Darling test. Since the data is not normal, we selected
non-parametric test for statistical analysis. Viral load comparisons between
groups were analyzed using nonparametric Mann Whitney t test with threshold set
at 0.05 (p< 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the mean
(SEM). We observed statistically significant difference with the sample sizes
used in this study to evaluate the limit of detection (n = 4) of the microchip
as well as microchip specificity (n = 8). A comparison study was performed as
well with Bland-Altman analysis, between results from the printed flexible
plastic microchips and results from RT-qPCR. Statistical analysis was performed
using Prism (Version 5, Graphpad, La Jolla, CA).
Authors: Chao-Min Cheng; Andres W Martinez; Jinlong Gong; Charles R Mace; Scott T Phillips; Emanuel Carrilho; Katherine A Mirica; George M Whitesides Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Corey Casper; Elizabeth Krantz; Stacy Selke; Steven R Kuntz; Jie Wang; Meei-Li Huang; John S Pauk; Lawrence Corey; Anna Wald Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Hadi Shafiee; Muntasir Jahangir; Fatih Inci; Shuqi Wang; Remington B M Willenbrecht; Francoise F Giguel; Athe M N Tsibris; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Utkan Demirci Journal: Small Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: M Ho; G Miller; R W Atchison; M K Breinig; J S Dummer; W Andiman; T E Starzl; R Eastman; B P Griffith; R L Hardesty Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1985-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: A Scott Laney; Michael J Cannon; Harold W Jaffe; Margaret K Offermann; Chin-Yih Ou; Kay W Radford; Mitesh M Patel; Thomas J Spira; Clifford J Gunthel; Philip E Pellett; Sheila C Dollard Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Sikhulile Moyo; Terence Mohammed; Kathleen E Wirth; Melanie Prague; Kara Bennett; Molly Pretorius Holme; Lucy Mupfumi; Philemon Sebogodi; Natasha O Moraka; Corretah Boleo; Comfort N Maphorisa; Boitumelo Seraise; Simani Gaseitsiwe; Rosemary M Musonda; Erik van Widenfelt; Kathleen M Powis; Tendani Gaolathe; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Joseph M Makhema; Max Essex; Shahin Lockman; Vladimir Novitsky Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hakan Inan; Muhammet Poyraz; Fatih Inci; Mark A Lifson; Murat Baday; Brian T Cunningham; Utkan Demirci Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Mark A Lifson; Mehmet Ozgun Ozen; Fatih Inci; ShuQi Wang; Hakan Inan; Murat Baday; Timothy J Henrich; Utkan Demirci Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 15.470