Jennifer L Reed1, Mohsin A Zaidi2, Tiffany D Woods3, Justin R Bates4, Maria T Britto4, Jill S Huppert5. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. Electronic address: jennifer.reed@cchmc.org. 2. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. 3. Universidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE) School of Medicine, Santo Domingo, Republica Dominicana. 4. Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 5. Division of Gynecology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To understand Emergency Department (ED) utilization patterns for women who received sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and explore the impact of post-visit telephone contact on future ED visits. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We performed a secondary analysis on a prospectively collected dataset of ED patients ages 14-21 years at a children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dataset documented initial and return visits, STI results, race, age and post-visit contact success (telephone contact ≤7 days of visit). Logistic regression was performed identifying variables that predicted a return visit to the ED, a return visit with STI testing, and subsequent positive STI results. RESULTS: Of 922 women with STI testing at their initial ED visit, 216 (23%) were STI positive. One-third (315/922) returned to the ED, 15% (141/922) returned and had STI testing, and 4% (38/922) had a subsequent STI. Of 216 STI-positive women, 59% were successfully contacted. Of those who returned to the ED, age ≥ 18 and Black race were associated with increased STI testing at a subsequent visit. Successful contact reduced the likelihood of STI testing at a subsequent ED visit (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.01-0.8), and ED empiric antibiotic treatment had no effect on subsequent STI testing. CONCLUSION: Contacting women with STI results and counseling them regarding safe sex behaviors may reduce the number of ED patients who return with symptoms or a new exposure necessitating STI testing. The high STI prevalence and frequent return rate suggest that ED interventions are needed.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To understand Emergency Department (ED) utilization patterns for women who received sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and explore the impact of post-visit telephone contact on future ED visits. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We performed a secondary analysis on a prospectively collected dataset of ED patients ages 14-21 years at a children's hospital. INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dataset documented initial and return visits, STI results, race, age and post-visit contact success (telephone contact ≤7 days of visit). Logistic regression was performed identifying variables that predicted a return visit to the ED, a return visit with STI testing, and subsequent positive STI results. RESULTS: Of 922 women with STI testing at their initial ED visit, 216 (23%) were STI positive. One-third (315/922) returned to the ED, 15% (141/922) returned and had STI testing, and 4% (38/922) had a subsequent STI. Of 216 STI-positive women, 59% were successfully contacted. Of those who returned to the ED, age ≥ 18 and Black race were associated with increased STI testing at a subsequent visit. Successful contact reduced the likelihood of STI testing at a subsequent ED visit (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.01-0.8), and ED empiric antibiotic treatment had no effect on subsequent STI testing. CONCLUSION: Contacting women with STI results and counseling them regarding safe sex behaviors may reduce the number of ED patients who return with symptoms or a new exposure necessitating STI testing. The high STI prevalence and frequent return rate suggest that ED interventions are needed.
Authors: Laura H Bachmann; David Pigott; Renee Desmond; Marga Jones; Jaqueline Lumpkins; Prerna Gala; Thomas Terndrup; Edward W Hook Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Lauren Simendinger; Sarah Griffeth; Hye Grace Kim; Jill S Huppert Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Jennifer L Reed; Jennifer Knopf Munafo; Rachel Ekstrand; Gordon Gillespie; Carolyn Holland; Maria T Britto Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Frank Biro; Dongmei Lan; Joel E Mortensen; Jennifer Reed; Gail B Slap Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Gordon Lee Gillespie; Jennifer Reed; Carolyn K Holland; Jennifer Knopf Munafo; Rachael Ekstrand; Maria T Britto; Jill Huppert Journal: Adv Emerg Nurs J Date: 2013 Jan-Mar