OBJECTIVE: Although testing for Chlamydia trachomatis is encouraged and increasingly practiced at sexually transmitted disease (STD) and family planning clinics, patterns of testing and follow-up in other settings are not well described. To begin to address these issues, we performed a chart review of patients with a positive laboratory test for C. trachomatis at a major university medical center. METHODS: Chart review of medical records for all patients with positive laboratory tests for C. trachomatis during calendar year 1996. RESULTS: Of 326 patients with positive tests, 95% were female and 5% were male. Median age was 22 for females and 25 for males. Most positive C. trachomatis test results were from the emergency room (ER)/walk-in clinic (55%) or patients receiving obstetric/gynecologic (OB/GYN) care (31%). While most C. trachomatis tests performed were on patients who had symptoms, patterns of treatment varied between sites. Fifty-seven percent of ER/walk-in patients received empiric antibiotics at the initial visit versus 36% of patients under OB/GYN care. Among patients with positive screening tests seen in the ER/walk-in clinic, 32% of patients had no treatment documented versus 14% of OB/GYN patients. Four percent of women with positive tests who did not receive therapy at the time of their initial evaluation developed pelvic inflammatory disease in the interval between testing and return to the medical center. CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients with positive chlamydial screening tests, the proportion not treated was similar to that found in studies performed in STD clinics.
OBJECTIVE: Although testing for Chlamydia trachomatis is encouraged and increasingly practiced at sexually transmitted disease (STD) and family planning clinics, patterns of testing and follow-up in other settings are not well described. To begin to address these issues, we performed a chart review of patients with a positive laboratory test for C. trachomatis at a major university medical center. METHODS: Chart review of medical records for all patients with positive laboratory tests for C. trachomatis during calendar year 1996. RESULTS: Of 326 patients with positive tests, 95% were female and 5% were male. Median age was 22 for females and 25 for males. Most positive C. trachomatis test results were from the emergency room (ER)/walk-in clinic (55%) or patients receiving obstetric/gynecologic (OB/GYN) care (31%). While most C. trachomatis tests performed were on patients who had symptoms, patterns of treatment varied between sites. Fifty-seven percent of ER/walk-in patients received empiric antibiotics at the initial visit versus 36% of patients under OB/GYN care. Among patients with positive screening tests seen in the ER/walk-in clinic, 32% of patients had no treatment documented versus 14% of OB/GYN patients. Four percent of women with positive tests who did not receive therapy at the time of their initial evaluation developed pelvic inflammatory disease in the interval between testing and return to the medical center. CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients with positive chlamydial screening tests, the proportion not treated was similar to that found in studies performed in STD clinics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alabama; Americas; Chlamydia; Clinical Research; Developed Countries; Diseases; Examinations And Diagnoses; Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Measurement; North America; Northern America; Reproductive Tract Infections; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Testing; United States
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Mohsin A Zaidi; Tiffany D Woods; Justin R Bates; Maria T Britto; Jill S Huppert Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Johan H Melendez; Jill S Huppert; Mary Jett-Goheen; Elizabeth A Hesse; Nicole Quinn; Charlotte A Gaydos; Chris D Geddes Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: David Wong; Stuart M Berman; Bruce W Furness; Robert A Gunn; Melanie Taylor; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jill S Huppert; Jennifer L Reed; Jennifer Knopf Munafo; Rachel Ekstrand; Gordon Gillespie; Carolyn Holland; Maria T Britto Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Stephanie N Taylor; Shelly Lensing; Jane Schwebke; Rebecca Lillis; Leandro A Mena; Anita L Nelson; Anne Rinaldi; Lisa Saylor; Linda McNeil; Jeannette Y Lee Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Wei Huang; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mathilda R Barnes; Mary Jett-Goheen; Diane R Blake Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Charlotte A Gaydos; Barbara Van Der Pol; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Carey Clark; Grace E Daniel; Paula B Dixon; Edward W Hook Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 5.948