Literature DB >> 26046026

Trend of posterior teeth restoration at ibadan, Nigeria.

S O Gbadebo1, O O Anifowose1, T J Ogunrinde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Dental amalgam is the most used restorative material in the posterior region of the mouth and has proven to be remarkably durable; however there has been a global change in recent years to restore posterior teeth with composite resin. AIM &
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the trend of posterior teeth cavity restorations at the University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria.
METHODOLOGY: A-5year retrospective analysis of all the restored posterior cavities at the Dental Conservation Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Class of cavities, the teeth affected, and the type of restoration made, the outcome and the demographics of the patients were part recorded. The data were analyzed using SPSS Version 20, for frequencies, and means were used for continuous variables while chi square was used to compare the categorical variables (P ≤0.05).
RESULTS: A total of 845 teeth were restored during the study period in 368(43.6 %) males and 477(56.4 %) females with mean age of 40.4 ±15.92 years and male to female ratio of 1:1.3. While the first and second molars were the most (62.6%) restored teeth, Class I cavity was the most restored (42.4%) cavity and the majority (80.4%) of the restorations was done with composite. There was a statistical significant reduction in use of amalgam in restoring posterior teeth over the 5 year period. (p=0.000).
CONCLUSION: The use of amalgam as choice material for restoration of posterior teeth is gradually being replaced by composite in our environment which emphasizes the need to ensure the quality and durability of the composites used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite restoration; Ibadan; Nigeria; Posterior teeth restoration; trend

Year:  2013        PMID: 26046026      PMCID: PMC4437233     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg        ISSN: 2276-6944


  20 in total

1.  Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.

Authors:  F J T Burke; S McHugh; A C Hall; R C Randall; E Widstrom; H Forss
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.

Authors:  Cláudia Regina Buainain de Freitas; Maria Isabel Serra Miranda; Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade; Victor Humberto Orbegoso Flores; Luís Geraldo Vaz; Catanzaro Guimarães
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Bernardo; Henrique Luis; Michael D Martin; Brian G Leroux; Tessa Rue; Jorge Leitão; Timothy A DeRouen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 4.  Posterior amalgam restorations--usage, regulation, and longevity.

Authors:  Richard J Mitchell; Mari Koike; Toru Okabe
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2007-07

5.  Teaching of posterior composites in dental schools in Japan.

Authors:  M Hayashi; L L Seow; C D Lynch; N H F Wilson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.

Authors:  F P Nothdurft; E Seidel; F Gebhart; M Naumann; P J Motter; P R Pospiech
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998.

Authors:  G J Christensen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Amalgam or composite fillings--which material lasts longer?

Authors:  Dominic Hurst
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2014-06

9.  Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Carlos Jose Soares; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins; Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Lourenco Correr-Sobrinho; Alfredo Julio Fernandes Neto
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review.

Authors:  Arvind Shenoy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.